IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v37y2000i6p833-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power, Mastery And Organizational Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Blackler
  • Seonaidh McDonald

Abstract

The topic of power has not featured strongly in debates about organizational learning, a point that is illustrated in a discussion of influential studies of teamworking. Despite the insights that such studies have provided into the nature of expertise and collaboration they have tended not to explore the relevance of issues of hierarchy, politics and institutionalized power relations. The paper addresses the problem by exploring the links between power, expertise and organizational learning. Power is analysed both as the medium for, and the product of, collective activity. The approach emphasizes how skills and imaginations are intertwined with social, technical and institutional structures. While studies of teamworking have concentrated on situations where imaginations and structures are tightly linked, unexpected developments may occur when these relations are loosened. Such situations occur when the needs of the moment overshadow normal routines and relationships and there is no single overview or centre of control. It is suggested that organizational learning can be conceptualized as the movement between familiar and emergent activities and between established and emergent social relations. Events in a two‐year action research project are used to illustrate the approach and explore episodes of decentred collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Blackler & Seonaidh McDonald, 2000. "Power, Mastery And Organizational Learning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 833-852, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:37:y:2000:i:6:p:833-852
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frédéric CREPLET & Olivier DUPOUET & Francis KERN & Francis MUNIER, 2002. "Organizational and Cognitive Duality of the firm with community concept," Working Papers of BETA 2002-10, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. A. Willem & H. Scarbrough, 2005. "Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/355, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Frédéric CREPLET & Olivier DUPOUET & Francis KERN & Francis MUNIER, 2004. "Organizational and Cognitive Duality of the firm with community concept," Working Papers of BETA 2004-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Francis MUNIER, 2008. "Guanxi and business environment in china: an innovative network as a process of knowledge-based economy," Working Papers 2, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    5. Kimble, Chris & Grenier, Corinne & Goglio-Primard, Karine, 2010. "Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 437-444.
    6. Böhling, Kathrin & Busch, Tanja & Berthoin Antal, Ariane & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2006. "Lernprozesse im Kontext von UN-Weltgipfeln: Die Vergesellschaftung internationalen Regierens," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Innovation and Organization SP III 2006-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Greig, Gail & Entwistle, Vikki A. & Beech, Nic, 2012. "Addressing complex healthcare problems in diverse settings: Insights from activity theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 305-312.
    8. María del Carmen Triana & Toyah L. Miller & Tiffany M. Trzebiatowski, 2014. "The Double-Edged Nature of Board Gender Diversity: Diversity, Firm Performance, and the Power of Women Directors as Predictors of Strategic Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 609-632, April.
    9. Ekanem, Ignatius, 2005. "‘Bootstrapping’: the investment decision-making process in small firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 299-318.
    10. Ribeiro, Richard & Kimble, Chris & Cairns, Paul, 2010. "Quantum phenomena in Communities of Practice," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 21-27.
    11. Mikael Holmqvist, 2004. "Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organizations: An Empirical Study of Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 70-81, February.
    12. Guido Maes & Geert Van Hootegem, 2022. "Power and Politics in Different Change Discourses," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Olsen, Per Ingvar & Prenkert, Frans & Hoholm, Thomas & Harrison, Debbie, 2014. "The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2579-2589.
    14. Olivera Andjelkovic & Mehraz Boolaky, 2015. "Organizational Learning: A Case Study of an International Non-profit Organization," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 124-137, March.
    15. Frédéric CREPLET & Olivier DUPOUET & Francis KERN & Francis MUNIER, 2000. "Tie Organizational and Cognitive Duality of the firm with community concept," Working Papers of BETA 2000-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    16. Creplet, F. & Dupouet, O. & Kern, F. & Mehmanpazir, B. & Munier, F., 2001. "Consultants and experts in management consulting firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1517-1535, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:37:y:2000:i:6:p:833-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.