IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i7p811-823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power in the U.S. political economy: A network analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nishant Malik
  • David Spencer
  • Quang Neo Bui

Abstract

Many features of the U.S. political economy arise from the interactions between large political and economic institutions, and yet we know little about the nature of their interactions and the power distribution between these institutions. In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of networks of U.S.‐based organizations, where edges represent three different kinds of relationships, namely owner–owned (ownerships), donor–donee (donations), and service provider–payee (transactions). Our findings suggest that in the ownerships network, the financial organizations form the core, and banking organizations hold strategic locations in the network. In the transactions network, the government organizations and agencies form the core, and defense‐related organizations form the backbone. In contrast, with the donations network, no specific domain of organizations forms either the core or the backbone.

Suggested Citation

  • Nishant Malik & David Spencer & Quang Neo Bui, 2021. "Power in the U.S. political economy: A network analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(7), pages 811-823, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:811-823
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24453
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winecoff William Kindred, 2015. "Structural power and the global financial crisis: a network analytical approach," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 495-525, October.
    2. Koger, Gregory & Masket, Seth & Noel, Hans, 2009. "Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 633-653, July.
    3. Yang-Yu Liu & Jean-Jacques Slotine & Albert-László Barabási, 2011. "Controllability of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7346), pages 167-173, May.
    4. John Kenneth Galbraith, 1983. "The Anatomy of Power," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 26-33, July.
    5. David Liben‐Nowell & Jon Kleinberg, 2007. "The link‐prediction problem for social networks," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(7), pages 1019-1031, May.
    6. Weingast, Barry R. & Wittman, Donald, 2008. "The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199548477, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Rui & Ujang, Norsidah & Hamid, Hussain bin & Manan, Mohd Shahrudin Abd & He, Yuou & Li, Rong & Wu, Jianjun, 2018. "Detecting the urban traffic network structure dynamics through the growth and analysis of multi-layer networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 800-817.
    2. Arndt Wonka & Sebastian Haunss, 2020. "Cooperation in networks: Political parties and interest groups in EU policy-making in Germany," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 130-151, March.
    3. Nicolò, Antonio & Yu, Yan, 2008. "Strategic divide and choose," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 268-289, September.
    4. Sadiraj, Vjollca & Tuinstra, Jan & van Winden, Frans, 2010. "Identification of voters with interest groups improves the electoral chances of the challenger," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 210-216, November.
    5. Guilherme T Valente & Marcio L Acencio & Cesar Martins & Ney Lemke, 2013. "The Development of a Universal In Silico Predictor of Protein-Protein Interactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Hiroyasu INOUE, 2016. "Analyses of Aggregate Fluctuations of Firm Networks Based on the Self-Organized Criticality Model and Control Theory," Discussion papers 16044, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Tong Huang & Lihua Zhou & Kevin Lü & Lizhen Wang & Hongmei Chen & Guowang Du, 2025. "An Empirical Evaluation of Algorithms for Link Prediction," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 347-365, February.
    8. Daniel Grigat & Fabio Caccioli, 2017. "Reverse stress testing interbank networks," Papers 1702.08744, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    9. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Jiang, Meihui & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2024. "Supply shock propagation in the multi-layer network of global steel product chain: Additive effect of trade and production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Jeong, Yujin & Park, Inchae & Yoon, Byungun, 2019. "Identifying emerging Research and Business Development (R&BD) areas based on topic modeling and visualization with intellectual property right data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 655-672.
    11. Enrico Spolaore, 2009. "National Borders, Conflict and Peace," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0744, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    12. Zhen Liu & Jia-Lin He & Komal Kapoor & Jaideep Srivastava, 2013. "Correlations between Community Structure and Link Formation in Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    13. Campos, Nauro F., 2019. "B for Brexit: A Survey of the Economics Academic Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 12134, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Arthur Grimes & Chris Young, 2010. "Anticipatory Effects of Rail Upgrades: Auckland’s Western Line," Working Papers 10_11, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    15. Wang, Jiqiang, 2019. "Disturbance attenuation of complex dynamical systems through interaction topology design," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 576-584.
    16. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Chen, Lu & Li, Xin, 2023. "Supply risk propagation of global copper industry chain based on multi-layer complex network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    17. Kalandrakis, Tasos, 2009. "A Reputational Theory of Two-Party Competition," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 4(4), pages 343-378, December.
    18. Xizhe Zhang & Huaizhen Wang & Tianyang Lv, 2017. "Efficient target control of complex networks based on preferential matching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, April.
    19. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Wandelt, Sebastian & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2015. "Evolution of the international air transportation country network from 2002 to 2013," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 55-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:811-823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.