IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v62y2024i4p973-992.html

Business Power and the Geoeconomic Turn in the Single European Market

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Eckert

Abstract

Building on the existing literature on business power that has evolved against the background of a liberal economic world order, this article develops a novel analytical framework to capture business strategies in an altered, geoeconomic context. It addresses the research question whether and how business power has been affected by the more recent turn of European policy‐makers to adopt geoeconomic measures in response to external geopoliticising pressures. The relevance of these categories for analysis is illustrated by discussing recent cases of business lobbying on the EU's geoeconomic agenda, as well as business responses to the sanctions imposed on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. These illustrative examples show that whilst most business actors have adapted their strategies, there are also cases where business actors adhere to and defend the status quo. The article prepares the ground for further research on the understudied consequences of the geoeconomic turn for business power.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Eckert, 2024. "Business Power and the Geoeconomic Turn in the Single European Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 973-992, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:4:p:973-992
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Christou & Chad Damro, 2024. "Frames and Issue Linkage: EU Trade Policy in the Geoeconomic Turn," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1080-1096, July.
    2. Lucia Quaglia & Amy Verdun, 2024. "The Geoeconomics of the Single Market for Financial Services," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1046-1062, July.
    3. Tomasz Jerzyniak & Anna Herranz‐Surrallés, 2024. "EU Geoeconomic Power in the Clean Energy Transition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1028-1045, July.
    4. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    5. Cadot, Olivier & Webber, Douglas, 2002. "Banana Splits: Policy Process, Particularistic Interests, Political Capture, and Money in Transatlantic Trade Politics," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 5-39, April.
    6. Abdelal, Rawi, 2015. "The multinational firm and geopolitics: Europe, Russian energy, and power," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 553-576, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    2. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    3. Floor Doppen & Theo Notteboom & Dirk Bièvre, 2025. "In the eye of a geopolitical storm: responses of port management bodies to investment screening in the EU," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Simon Otjes & Harmen van der Veer & Wolfgang Wagner, 2026. "Party‐Political Contestation of European Trade Policy. An Analysis of Roll Call Votes in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 559-581, March.
    5. Jan Ruck, 2026. "A Geoeconomic Fix? European Industrial Policy on Semiconductors Amidst Global Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 742-761, March.
    6. Matti Ylönen, 2026. "Reconceptualising the Brussels Effect," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 100-124, January.
    7. Øystein Tunsjø, 2026. "The EU's China Strategies: A Hedging Framework for Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 956-979, May.
    8. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    9. Schmitz, Luuk, 2026. "Hierarchies of Adaptation: Corporate Power in Economic Statecraft," SocArXiv gwuce_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Tomasz Jerzyniak & Anna Herranz‐Surrallés, 2024. "EU Geoeconomic Power in the Clean Energy Transition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1028-1045, July.
    11. Christian Freudlsperger & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "When Foreign Policy Becomes Trade Policy: The EU's Anti‐Coercion Instrument," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1063-1079, July.
    12. Nicolás Pose‐Ferraro, 2026. "Between Geopolitics and Political Economy: The European Union–Mercosur Negotiation to Form a Trade Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 248-267, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    2. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    3. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "The EU's Geoeconomic Turn: From Policy Laggard to Institutional Innovator," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1097-1115, July.
    4. Mari Carlson, 2026. "European Green Deal and Geopoliticisation of Trade: A Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis of EU Agricultural Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1113-1134, May.
    5. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    6. Rebecca Adler‐Nissen & Kristin Anabel Eggeling, 2024. "The Discursive Struggle for Digital Sovereignty: Security, Economy, Rights and the Cloud Project Gaia‐X," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 993-1011, July.
    7. Thomas Conzelmann & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2026. "The European Union in a Geo‐Economic World: Towards a New Inter‐Institutional Balance?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 511-532, March.
    8. Hansen, Olle, 2026. "EU integration after the Liberal International Order," IPE Working Papers 265/2026, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    9. Floor Doppen, 2026. "From Competition to Co‐Operation? FDI Screening in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 1496-1514, July.
    10. Nicolás Pose‐Ferraro, 2026. "Between Geopolitics and Political Economy: The European Union–Mercosur Negotiation to Form a Trade Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 248-267, January.
    11. Tomasz Jerzyniak, 2024. "The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies: Towards a New Clean Energy Geopolitical Order?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    12. Tingting Zheng & Chenchen Song & Liu Cao, 2025. "The Role of Policy Narrative Intensity in Accelerating Renewable Energy Innovation: Evidence from China’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-28, May.
    13. Tomasz Jerzyniak & Anna Herranz‐Surrallés, 2024. "EU Geoeconomic Power in the Clean Energy Transition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1028-1045, July.
    14. Agnieszka Gehringer, 2025. "China's Outward FDI in the European Union: How Much Geopolitics is in There?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 222-234, May.
    15. Sihong Wu & Di Fan & Yiyi Su, 2021. "The Co-Evolution of Global Legitimation and Technology Upgrading: The Case of Huawei," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 147-172.
    16. Oumayma El Rhrib & Laila Bennis, 2025. "Geofinance: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Post-Print hal-05212199, HAL.
    17. Culpepper Pepper D., 2015. "Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 391-409, October.
    18. Ana E. Juncos & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2024. "The Ideational Power of Strategic Autonomy in EU Security and External Economic Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 955-972, July.
    19. Heider, Florian & Lindner, Vincent & Pelizzon, Loriana & Tröger, Tobias, 2025. "Europäische Finanzintegration: Deutschlands Verantwortung und die Notwendigkeit zu handeln," SAFE Policy Letters 108, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    20. Doris Fuchs, 2017. "Windows of Opportunity for Whom? Commissioners, Access, and the Balance of Interest in European Environmental Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:4:p:973-992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.