IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i2p559-581.html

Party‐Political Contestation of European Trade Policy. An Analysis of Roll Call Votes in the European Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Otjes
  • Harmen van der Veer
  • Wolfgang Wagner

Abstract

We examine the dimensionality of the EU external relations space by analysing trade policy votes in the European Parliament (1999–2019). As it contains the EU's full geographical and ideological diversity, the European Parliament is an important laboratory for testing expectations about what predicts divisions over trade policy. We find that Members of the European Parliament's (MEP's)s voting behaviour is most strongly structured along the left/right dimension. In addition, the degree of environmentalism of MEPs' parties structures voting patterns on trade. Even though there has been a lot of attention on the relationship between trade and the rise of the populist radical right, we find no evidence that trade votes divide nationalist from cosmopolitan parties. Moreover, though the political groups in the European Parliament (EP) include members from a wide range of constituencies that differ on macroeconomic indicators, differences between constituencies in terms of employment or education level do not meaningfully structure MEPs' voting.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Otjes & Harmen van der Veer & Wolfgang Wagner, 2026. "Party‐Political Contestation of European Trade Policy. An Analysis of Roll Call Votes in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 559-581, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:559-581
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13764
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13764?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:2:p:559-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.