IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i1p248-267.html

Between Geopolitics and Political Economy: The European Union–Mercosur Negotiation to Form a Trade Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolás Pose‐Ferraro

Abstract

This article explores the reasons for the latest push to conclude the European Union (EU)–Mercosur agreement and what threatens its completion. I focus on three factors: the EU's geopolitical incentives, the EU's civil society organization (CSO) politicization and domestic political economy constraints. A longitudinal case study based on three pre‐specified stages reveals that the reduction of the opposition from Mercosur's expected distributional losers during the run‐up to the 2019 agreement, combined with higher geopolitical incentives in the EU from late 2022, paved the way for a successful renegotiation in 2023–2024 that reduced the EU's environmental CSO opposition. Furthermore, the combination of high geopolitical incentives and political economy constraints in the EU explains why the agreement's completion remains uncertain. This study informs debates on the ‘geopoliticization’ and ‘geoeconomic turn’ of the EU's trade policy by highlighting the tension between a geopolitically‐driven trade initiative and domestic political economy constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolás Pose‐Ferraro, 2026. "Between Geopolitics and Political Economy: The European Union–Mercosur Negotiation to Form a Trade Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 248-267, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:248-267
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13743
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Reddie, Andrew W., 2021. "Economic Statecraft in the 21st Century: Implications for the Future of the Global Trade Regime," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 137-151, May.
    2. Cornelia Woll, 2008. "Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade," Post-Print hal-02183956, HAL.
    3. Andrea Christou & Chad Damro, 2024. "Frames and Issue Linkage: EU Trade Policy in the Geoeconomic Turn," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1080-1096, July.
    4. Dirk De Bièvre & Arlo Poletti, 2020. "Towards Explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 243-253.
    5. Thomas Oatley, 2017. "Open economy politics and trade policy," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 699-717, July.
    6. Sandra Eckert, 2024. "Business Power and the Geoeconomic Turn in the Single European Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 973-992, July.
    7. David Lake, 2009. "Open economy politics: A critical review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 219-244, September.
    8. Alasdair R. Young, 2016. "Not your parents' trade politics: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 345-378, May.
    9. Cornelia Woll, 2008. "Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-02183956, HAL.
    10. Sophie Meunier & Kalypso Nicolaidis, 2019. "The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 103-113, September.
    11. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    12. Dirk De Bièvre & Arlo Poletti, 2020. "Towards Explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 243-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    2. Schmitz, Luuk, 2026. "Hierarchies of Adaptation: Corporate Power in Economic Statecraft," SocArXiv gwuce_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Simon Otjes & Harmen van der Veer & Wolfgang Wagner, 2026. "Party‐Political Contestation of European Trade Policy. An Analysis of Roll Call Votes in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 559-581, March.
    4. Anke Moerland & Clara Weinhardt, 2020. "Politicisation ‘Reversed’: EU Free Trade Negotiations with West Africa and the Caribbean," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 266-276.
    5. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "The EU's Geoeconomic Turn: From Policy Laggard to Institutional Innovator," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1097-1115, July.
    6. Thomas Jacobs & Niels Gheyle & Ferdi De Ville & Jan Orbie, 2023. "The Hegemonic Politics of ‘Strategic Autonomy’ and ‘Resilience’: COVID‐19 and the Dislocation of EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-19, January.
    7. Bart-Jaap Verbeek, 2022. "Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 110-120.
    8. Camille Nessel & Elke Verhaeghe, 2021. "‘A Force for Good’: The Narrative Construction of Ethical EU–Vietnam Trade Relations," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/336753, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Mari Carlson, 2026. "European Green Deal and Geopoliticisation of Trade: A Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis of EU Agricultural Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1113-1134, May.
    10. Christian Freudlsperger & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "When Foreign Policy Becomes Trade Policy: The EU's Anti‐Coercion Instrument," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1063-1079, July.
    11. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    12. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    13. Sangeeta Khorana & William A. Kerr, 2023. "The Stillborn United Kingdom‒United States Trade Agreement," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 186(2), pages 252-283, June.
    14. Aukje van Loon, 2020. "The Selective Politicization of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 325-335.
    15. Thomas Conzelmann & Sophie Vanhoonacker, 2026. "The European Union in a Geo‐Economic World: Towards a New Inter‐Institutional Balance?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 511-532, March.
    16. Jan Ruck, 2026. "A Geoeconomic Fix? European Industrial Policy on Semiconductors Amidst Global Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 742-761, March.
    17. Postigo, Antonio, 2016. "Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements: Government-business relations in the policymaking of bilateral free trade agreements," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 379-417.
    18. Andrea C. Bianculli, 2020. "Politicization and Regional Integration in Latin America: Implications for EU–MERCOSUR Negotiations?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 254-265.
    19. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
    20. Camille Nessel & Elke Verhaeghe, 2022. "‘A Force for Good’: The Narrative Construction of Ethical EU–Vietnam Trade Relations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 741-758, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:248-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.