IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ipewps/336779.html

EU integration after the Liberal International Order

Author

Listed:
  • Hansen, Olle

Abstract

The European Union (EU) emerged as a product and beneficiary of the Liberal International Order (LIO). Yet, as this order disintegrates, marked by multipolarity, thin multilateralism, and the return of power politics, the EU has taken unprecedented integrative steps, including joint debt issuance and development of industrial policy. Therefore, this paper asks how the shifting world order changes the logic of EU integration. Using a comparative discourse analysis of the EU's 2003 European Security Strategy, 2016 Global Strategy, and 2022 Strategic Compass, it traces how the logic of integration has shifted from being market-driven to being sovereignty-centred. The findings show that the order structure present during the EU's market-driven integration is no longer stable, prompting it to turn towards sovereignty-centred integration to respond to the disintegrating LIO. In doing so, this paper bridges mainstream integration theory with order theory, showing that not just internal dynamics but also order structure need to be accounted for to understand the logic of integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansen, Olle, 2026. "EU integration after the Liberal International Order," IPE Working Papers 265/2026, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:336779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/336779/1/1951176073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    2. Majone, Giandomenico, 1997. "From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 139-167, May.
    3. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    4. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    5. Mark A. Pollack, 2001. "International Relations Theory and European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 221-244, June.
    6. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    7. Daniel Fiott, 2024. "From Liberalisation to Industrial Policy: Towards a Geoeconomic Turn in the European Defence Market?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1012-1027, July.
    8. Mark Rhinard, 2019. "The Crisisification of Policy‐making in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 616-633, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Herranz‐Surrallés & Chad Damro & Sandra Eckert, 2024. "The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 919-937, July.
    2. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    3. Salih Işık Bora, 2026. "Isomorphic Spillover and Its Limits: The Institutionally Constrained Defence Industrial Policy of the European Union," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    4. Jan Ruck, 2026. "A Geoeconomic Fix? European Industrial Policy on Semiconductors Amidst Global Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 742-761, March.
    5. Rauh, Christian, 2025. "International recognition of European Union “actorness”: Language-based evidence from United Nations general debate speeches 1970–2020," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(5), pages 792-821.
    6. Benjamin Daßler & Moritz Weiss, 2026. "Beyond the European Army Illusion: A Prudent Strategy for the Real European Zeitenwende," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1272-1284, May.
    7. Tomasz Jerzyniak, 2024. "The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies: Towards a New Clean Energy Geopolitical Order?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    8. Tomasz Jerzyniak & Anna Herranz‐Surrallés, 2024. "EU Geoeconomic Power in the Clean Energy Transition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1028-1045, July.
    9. Erickson, Jennifer L., 2008. "Normative power and EU arms transfer policy: A theoretical critique and empirical test [Normative Macht und die EU-Waffenlieferungspolitik: Eine theoretische Kritik und ein empirischer Test]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Mari Carlson, 2026. "European Green Deal and Geopoliticisation of Trade: A Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis of EU Agricultural Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1113-1134, May.
    11. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.
    12. Grimmel, Andreas & Li, Yuan, 2018. "The belt and road initiative: A hybrid model of regionalism," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 122/2018, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    13. Pierre Haroche, 2024. "Geoeconomic Power Europe: When Global Power Competition Drives EU Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 938-954, July.
    14. Patrick Müller and Nicole Alecu de Flers, 2009. "Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    15. Matti Ylönen, 2026. "Reconceptualising the Brussels Effect," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 100-124, January.
    16. Milan Babic & Lukas Linsi, 2025. "Mapping Corporate Investments Between China and Europe in an Era of Geoeconomic Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 932-963, May.
    17. Laia Comerma, 2026. "China as a Catalyst of the European Union's Trade Defence Instruments," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 693-719, March.
    18. Paula Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & Sandra Lavenex & Philipp Lutz, 2023. "Expanding, Complementing, or Substituting Multilateralism? EU Preferential Trade Agreements in the Migration Regime Complex," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 49-61.
    19. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    20. Emil Kirchner, 2024. "Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 333-349, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:336779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iphwrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.