IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i3p956-979.html

The EU's China Strategies: A Hedging Framework for Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Øystein Tunsjø

Abstract

By drawing on the concept of hedging, this article develops an analytical framework that conceptualises and explains adjustments in the EU's China strategies since the end of the Cold War. It argues that the EU's China strategy shifted from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era and shifted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. Divided into four parts, the article first notes that despite a contemporary US–China bipolar system, the EU has maintained a general strategy of hedging towards China. The second part of the article defines and conceptualises hedging and provides a hedging framework for analysis based on three different types of hedging strategies. The third part explains the shift in the EU's China strategy from co‐operative to extensive hedging in the post‐Cold War era. The fourth part contends that the EU has adjusted from extensive to conflictive hedging in a new US–China bipolar system. The conclusion notes that the Soviet Union posed an overwhelming threat to Western Europe during the previous bipolar system, which compelled the European Economic Community towards containment and balancing. China represents much more of a risk than a threat to the EU in the new bipolar system, which allows the EU to sustain a hedging strategy and prioritise de‐risking.

Suggested Citation

  • Øystein Tunsjø, 2026. "The EU's China Strategies: A Hedging Framework for Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 956-979, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:956-979
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:3:p:956-979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.