IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v62y2024i3p744-759.html

Subsidiarity Ex Ante and Ex Post: From the Early Warning System to the Court of Justice of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn Huysmans
  • Ton van den Brink
  • Philippe van Gruisen

Abstract

The subsidiarity principle divides competences between the European Union and its Member States. The Lisbon Treaty suggests a connection between ex ante and ex post subsidiarity review. Ex ante, national parliaments were given a role via the early warning system (EWS). Ex post, legislation is subject to review by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). More than 10 years after Lisbon, this article is the first to theorize and evaluate whether there is indeed a connection. Our theory predicts a conditional connection. Quantitatively, we provide a two‐way classification of Member States based on their use of the EWS and CJEU subsidiarity cases. Qualitatively, we look back from court cases to the Council stage and analyse the Advocate General's opinions in subsidiarity cases. We find a weak conditional connection. A key explanation appears to be the Court's limited willingness to enforce subsidiarity and hence the limited incentives to go to court.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn Huysmans & Ton van den Brink & Philippe van Gruisen, 2024. "Subsidiarity Ex Ante and Ex Post: From the Early Warning System to the Court of Justice of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 744-759, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:3:p:744-759
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13531
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Tacea, 2021. "From Legal to Political Reasoning: National Parliaments' Use of Reasoned Opinions in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1573-1589, November.
    2. Paul Craig, 2012. "Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(S1), pages 72-87, March.
    3. Malang, Thomas & Brandenberger, Laurence & Leifeld, Philip, 2019. "Networks and Social Influence in European Legislative Politics," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 1475-1498, October.
    4. Martijn Huysmans, 2019. "Euroscepticism and the Early Warning System," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 431-447, May.
    5. Mette Buskjær Rasmussen & Maja Kluger Dionigi, 2018. "National Parliaments’ Use of the Political Dialogue: Institutional Lobbyists, Traditionalists or Communicators?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(5), pages 1108-1126, July.
    6. Thomas Horsley, 2012. "Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 267-282, March.
    7. Jouvenel Bertrand de, 1998. "De La Justice," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 127-144, March.
    8. repec:bpj:jeehcn:v:8:y:1998:i:1:p:127-144:n:6 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Philippe van Gruisen & Martijn Huysmans, 2020. "The Early Warning System and policymaking in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 451-473, September.
    10. Ian Cooper, 2006. "The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 281-304, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Tacea, 2021. "From Legal to Political Reasoning: National Parliaments' Use of Reasoned Opinions in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1573-1589, November.
    2. Martijn Huysmans, 2021. "Tanja Börzel. 2021. Why Noncompliance: The Politics of Law in the European Union (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 943-946, October.
    3. Maarten Hillebrandt, 2017. "Transparency as a Platform for Institutional Politics: The Case of the Council of the European Union," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 62-74.
    4. Pascale Amans & Sylvie Rascol-Boutard, 2006. "Controlling Complex Organizations on the Basis of an Operational Performance Measure," Post-Print hal-01659071, HAL.
    5. repec:pmu:cjurid:v:44:y:2011:p:24-47 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. John M. de Figueiredo & Brian Kelleher Richter, 2013. "Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying," NBER Working Papers 19698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Elias Mossialos, 2002. "The European Union and Health Policy, by Ed Randall. Palgrave, Hampshire and New York, 2001. No. of pages: xiii+278. ISBN 0‐333‐75426‐3.. The Implications of Recent Jurisprudence on the Co‐ordination of Health Care Protection Systems, by Willy Palm, ," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(3), pages 281-284, April.
    8. Martínez-Usarralde, María-Jesús & Pausá, Juan Murillo & García-López, Rafaela, 2017. "The ERASMUS experience and its capacitating potential: Analysis of adaptive capabilities," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 101-109.
    9. Dikau, Simon & Volz, Ulrich, 2021. "Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Ntanyoma, R.D., 2021. "Under the shadow of violence: slow genocide of the Banyamulenge in Eastern DRC," ISS Working Papers - General Series 682, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    11. Markus Gastinger & Eugénia C Heldt, 2022. "Measuring actual discretion of the European Commission: Using the discretion index to guide empirical research," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 541-558, September.
    12. Marc Fleurbaey & Cyrille Hagneré & Michel Martinez & Alain Trannoy, 1999. "Les minima sociaux en France : entre compensation et responsabilité," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 138(2), pages 1-23.
    13. Sylvie Ferrari & Alexandre Berthe, 2012. "Ecological inequalities: how to link unequal access to the environment with theories of justice?," Post-Print hal-00799045, HAL.
    14. Chileshe, P. & Trottier, J. & Wilson, L., 2005. "Translation of water rights and water management in Zambia," IWMI Books, Reports H038766, International Water Management Institute.
    15. Rohini Pande & Christopher Udry, 2005. "Institutions and Development:A View from Below," Working Papers 928, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    16. Benz, Arthur & Zimmer, Christina, . "The EU’s competences: The ‘vertical’ perspective on the multilevel system," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    17. Philippe van Gruisen & Martijn Huysmans, 2020. "The Early Warning System and policymaking in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 451-473, September.
    18. Stéphane Esquerré, 2019. "How do judges judge? Evidence of local effect on French bankruptcy judgments," Working Papers hal-02291688, HAL.
    19. Stéphane Esquerré, 2019. "Don't feed the zombies Essay on survival of bankrupt firms in French bankrupcty courts," Working Papers hal-02305501, HAL.
    20. Enrico Colombatto & Valerio Tavormina, 2018. "Regulating information flows: Is it just? Insider trading and mandatory-disclosure rules from a free-market perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 205-221, October.
    21. repec:ilo:ilowps:360886 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Filip Jasinski, 2006. "National Co-ordination of the Fight against Trafficking in Human Beings: Recommendations for Poland as a 'New' EU Member State," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 16, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:3:p:744-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.