IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i6p1449-1463.html

PULPO: A framework for efficient integration of life cycle inventory models into life cycle product optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Lechtenberg
  • Robert Istrate
  • Victor Tulus
  • Antonio Espuña
  • Moisès Graells
  • Gonzalo Guillén‐Gosálbez

Abstract

This work presents the PULPO (Python‐based user‐defined lifecycle product optimization) framework, developed to efficiently integrate life cycle inventory (LCI) models into life cycle product optimization. Life cycle optimization (LCO), which has found interest in both the process systems engineering and life cycle assessment (LCA) communities, leverages LCA data to go beyond simple assessments of a limited number of alternatives and identify the best possible product systems configuration subject to a manifold of choices, constraints, and objectives. However, typically, aggregated inventories are used to build the optimization problems. Contrary to existing frameworks, PULPO integrates whole LCI databases and user inventories as a backbone for the optimization problem, considering economy‐wide feedback loops between fore‐ and background systems that would otherwise be omitted. The open‐source implementation combines functions from Brightway2 for the manipulation of inventory data and pyomo for the formulation and solution of the optimization problem. The advantages of this approach are demonstrated in a case study focusing on the design of optimal future global green methanol production systems from captured CO2 and electrolytic H2. It is shown that the approach can be used to assess sector‐coupling with multi‐functional processes and prospective background databases that would otherwise be impractical to approach from a standalone LCA perspective. The use of PULPO is particularly appealing when evaluating large‐scale decisions that have a strong impact on socioeconomic systems, resulting in changes in the technosphere on which the background system is based and which is often assumed constant in standard LCO approaches regardless of the decisions taken. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Lechtenberg & Robert Istrate & Victor Tulus & Antonio Espuña & Moisès Graells & Gonzalo Guillén‐Gosálbez, 2024. "PULPO: A framework for efficient integration of life cycle inventory models into life cycle product optimization," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1449-1463, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1449-1463
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13561
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Simon Araya & Vincenzo Liso & Xiaoti Cui & Na Li & Jimin Zhu & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Søren Højgaard Jensen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2020. "A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Tereza Assis Bicalho Bicalho & Ildo Sauer & Alexandre Rambaud & Yulia Altukhova-Nys, 2017. "LCA data quality: A management science perspective," Post-Print hal-02958533, HAL.
    3. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Gustavo Larrea‐Gallegos & Ian Vázquez‐Rowe & Hugo Wiener & Ramzy Kahhat, 2019. "Applying the Technology Choice Model in Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study in the Peruvian Agricultural Sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(3), pages 601-614, June.
    5. Christine Roxanne Hung & Paul Kishimoto & Volker Krey & Anders Hammer Strømman & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2022. "ECOPT2: An adaptable life cycle assessment model for the environmentally constrained optimization of prospective technology transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1616-1630, October.
    6. Hatem Alhazmi & Faris H. Almansour & Zaid Aldhafeeri, 2021. "Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Angelica Mendoza Beltran & Brian Cox & Chris Mutel & Detlef P. van Vuuren & David Font Vivanco & Sebastiaan Deetman & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Jeroen Guinée & Arnold Tukker, 2020. "When the Background Matters: Using Scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(1), pages 64-79, February.
    8. Marvin Bachmann & Christian Zibunas & Jan Hartmann & Victor Tulus & Sangwon Suh & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez & André Bardow, 2023. "Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 599-610, May.
    9. Faye Duchin & Stephen H. Levine, 2011. "Sectors May Use Multiple Technologies Simultaneously: The Rectangular Choice-Of-Technology Model With Binding Factor Constraints," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 281-302, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michaël Lejeune & Sami Kara & Michael Zwicky Hauschild & Sareh Shahrabifarahani & Rahman Daiyan, 2026. "Pathways to global hydrogen production within planetary boundaries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Palazzo & Roland Geyer & Sangwon Suh, 2020. "A review of methods for characterizing the environmental consequences of actions in life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 815-829, August.
    2. Lisa Duval & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & François Saunier & François Maréchal & Manuele Margni, 2024. "Optimization of the end‐of‐life tire repartition within the European treatment system to minimize its environmental impacts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 512-526, June.
    3. Christine Roxanne Hung & Paul Kishimoto & Volker Krey & Anders Hammer Strømman & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2022. "ECOPT2: An adaptable life cycle assessment model for the environmentally constrained optimization of prospective technology transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1616-1630, October.
    4. Ladislaus Lang‐Quantzendorff & Martin Beermann, 2025. "Time‐differentiating methods for life cycle assessment of the industry transition toward climate neutrality: A review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(5), pages 1523-1550, October.
    5. Magnaval, Gabriel & Boulay, Anne-Marie, 2025. "Development of an analytical model of automobile energy consumption during use-phase for parametrized life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Abdulmajeed Almadhi & Abdelhakim Abdelhadi & Rakan Alyamani, 2023. "Moving from Linear to Circular Economy in Saudi Arabia: Life-Cycle Assessment on Plastic Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Zou, Quan & Zhang, Shuheng & Wang, Shubin & Wang, Longhui & Du, Jianwei, 2026. "A review on echelon utilization and cathode material recycling of retired power batteries: Recovery efficiency and carbon emission reduction benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    8. Anders Arvesen & Steve Völler & Christine Roxanne Hung & Volker Krey & Magnus Korpås & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2021. "Emissions of electric vehicle charging in future scenarios: The effects of time of charging," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1250-1263, October.
    9. Carina Harpprecht & Lauran van Oers & Stephen A. Northey & Yongxiang Yang & Bernhard Steubing, 2021. "Environmental impacts of key metals' supply and low‐carbon technologies are likely to decrease in the future," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1543-1559, December.
    10. Freire Ordóñez, Diego & Shah, Nilay & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Economic and full environmental assessment of electrofuels via electrolysis and co-electrolysis considering externalities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    11. Su, Shu & Ju, Jingyi & Guo, Qiyue & Li, Xiaodong & Zhu, Yimin, 2023. "A temporally dynamic model for regional carbon impact assessment based on city information modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Zhang, Bo & Zhang, Chuan & Song, Xuehang & Liu, Shuang & Duan, Yu & Nie, Hongdi & Luo, Wenbo & Wei, Wei & Sun, Nannan, 2026. "Methanol production technology development pathways under multi-agent stochastic evolutionary game: a complex network perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    13. Aleš Paulu & Valentina Bisinella & Vladimír Kočí, 2025. "Environmental assessment of potential industrial waste management in the Czech Republic," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(4), pages 1185-1196, August.
    14. Luca Di Paolo & Simona Abbate & Eliseo Celani & Davide Di Battista & Giovanni Candeloro, 2022. "Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Plastic Items and Their Substitution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Christopher Kennedy & Reid Lifset, 2020. "Winners of the 2018 Graedel Prizes: The Journal of Industrial Ecology best paper prizes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 268-270, April.
    16. Rahaf Ajaj & Wisam Abu Jadayil & Hamna Anver & Eman Aqil, 2022. "A Revision for the Different Reuses of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Water Bottles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Shan, Tilun & Chen, Hu & Liu, Ting & Ma, Zizhen & Tan, Yan & Zhang, Huawei, 2025. "Synergistic effects in the Co-pyrolysis of waste tires, plastics, and corn stalks: Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses for enhanced resource utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    18. Kai Li & Hauke Ward & Hai Xiang Lin & Arnold Tukker, 2024. "Economic viability requires higher recycling rates for imported plastic waste than expected," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Oro, Gianmarco, 2026. "Global value chains under full employment: An input–output linear optimization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 274-284.
    20. Hussein Al-Yafei & Saleh Aseel & Ali Ansaruddin Kunju, 2025. "Evaluating the Sustainability of the Natural Gas-Based Methanol-to-Gasoline Industry: A Global Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1449-1463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.