IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i3p512-526.html

Optimization of the end‐of‐life tire repartition within the European treatment system to minimize its environmental impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Duval
  • Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez
  • François Saunier
  • François Maréchal
  • Manuele Margni

Abstract

This study contrasts two different approaches to inform European‐scale decision‐making to mitigate the environmental impacts of the end‐of‐life tires (ELT) management system. The first analysis is a traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) that compares the environmental performances of the 12 main available European end‐of‐life (EOL) technologies in ELT processing while restricting the boundaries to the EOL stage. The second analysis has a broader scope, addressing the optimization of the ELT distribution within the 12 considered pathways to minimize the environmental impacts of the total tire use in Europe under present capacity and constraints. The results of the traditional LCA show that, except for landfill, all the tested EOL routes present environmental benefits. Material recovery pathways bring the most environmental credits, whereas civil engineering pathways are the least promising. The LCA results that emerged from the optimization of ELT management technologies yield two optimal technological mixes that maximize the quantity of ELT recycled in molded objects production: such results represent a hypothetical case with no constraints. When considering constraints, that is, limitations on maximum quantities of ELT that can undergo retreading, pyrolysis, or recycling in synthetic turfs, in molded objects and in production, the number of optimal technology mixes increases to five. The type of technologies favored depends on the minimized impact categories (climate change, fossil and nuclear energy use, human health, and ecosystem quality). A comparison between constrained and unconstrained scenarios shows that achieving the best environmental performances is conditional to the accessibility of the EOL technologies as well as their individual environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Duval & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & François Saunier & François Maréchal & Manuele Margni, 2024. "Optimization of the end‐of‐life tire repartition within the European treatment system to minimize its environmental impacts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 512-526, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:512-526
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13474
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lebreton, Baptiste & Tuma, Axel, 2006. "A quantitative approach to assessing the profitability of car and truck tire remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 639-652, December.
    2. Siavash Khalili & Eetu Rantanen & Dmitrii Bogdanov & Christian Breyer, 2019. "Global Transportation Demand Development with Impacts on the Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Climate-Constrained World," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-54, October.
    3. Lars Wietschel & Lukas Messmann & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2021. "Environmental benefits of large‐scale second‐generation bioethanol production in the EU: An integrated supply chain network optimization and life cycle assessment approach," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 677-692, June.
    4. Maik Budzinski & Otávio Cavalett & Roy Nitzsche & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2019. "Assessment of lignocellulosic biorefineries in Germany using a hybrid LCA multi‐objective optimization model," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1172-1185, October.
    5. Panagiotis Grammelis & Nikolaos Margaritis & Petros Dallas & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Georgios Mavrias, 2021. "A Review on Management of End of Life Tires (ELTs) and Alternative Uses of Textile Fibers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Amir Rowhani & Thomas J. Rainey, 2016. "Scrap Tyre Management Pathways and Their Use as a Fuel—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Faye Duchin & Stephen H. Levine, 2011. "Sectors May Use Multiple Technologies Simultaneously: The Rectangular Choice-Of-Technology Model With Binding Factor Constraints," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 281-302, March.
    8. Christine Roxanne Hung & Paul Kishimoto & Volker Krey & Anders Hammer Strømman & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, 2022. "ECOPT2: An adaptable life cycle assessment model for the environmentally constrained optimization of prospective technology transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1616-1630, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2017. "A game model of competition between a new good producer and a remanufacturer using negative advertising," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 329-336, October.
    2. Magnaval, Gabriel & Boulay, Anne-Marie, 2025. "Development of an analytical model of automobile energy consumption during use-phase for parametrized life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon & Solomon, A.A. & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Aghahosseini, Arman & Mensah, Theophilus Nii Odai & Ram, Manish & Breyer, Christian, 2021. "Just transition towards defossilised energy systems for developing economies: A case study of Ethiopia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 346-365.
    4. Zhao, Chuyun & Tang, Jinjun & Kong, Xiangxin & Yu, Tianjian & Li, Zhitao, 2024. "Emission analysis of multi-mode public transportation based on joint choice model considering built environment factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Aydin, Muhammed Iberia & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2022. "An assessment study on various clean hydrogen production methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. František Milichovský, 2017. "An Impact of Reverse Logistics Activities on Marketing Communication," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 669-678.
    7. Niknejad, A. & Petrovic, D., 2014. "Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 143-154.
    8. Daniel Rasbash & Kevin Joseph Dillman & Jukka Heinonen & Eyjólfur Ingi Ásgeirsson, 2023. "A National and Regional Greenhouse Gas Breakeven Assessment of EVs across North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Batabyal Amitrajeet A. & Beladi Hamid, 2018. "Advertising and Competition for Market Share between a New Good Producer and a Remanufacturer," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 113-118, February.
    10. Impha Yalagudige Dharmegowda & Lakshmidevamma Madarakallu Muniyappa & Parameshwara Siddalingaiah & Ajith Bintravalli Suresh & Manjunath Patel Gowdru Chandrashekarappa & Chander Prakash, 2022. "MgO Nano-Catalyzed Biodiesel Production from Waste Coconut Oil and Fish Oil Using Response Surface Methodology and Grasshopper Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Bölen, Mehmet Cem, 2020. "From traditional wristwatch to smartwatch: Understanding the relationship between innovation attributes, switching costs and consumers' switching intention," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Hyewon Lee, 2023. "A Study on the Production Methods of Upcycling Tweed Fabric Using Clothing Waste Based on Chanel’s Tweed Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Agnieszka Skala, 2022. "Sustainable Transport and Mobility—Oriented Innovative Startups and Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Ram, Manish & Satymov, Rasul & Lopez, Gabriel & Mensah, Theophilus N.O. & Sadovskaia, Kristina & Breyer, Christian, 2025. "Costs and benefits of highly ambitious energy transition pathways for Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    15. Simone Wurster, 2021. "Creating a Circular Economy in the Automotive Industry: The Contribution of Combining Crowdsourcing and Delphi Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2018. "How transport costs affect the decision to purchase a new or a remanufactured good," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 529-542, August.
    17. Martínez, Juan Daniel, 2021. "An overview of the end-of-life tires status in some Latin American countries: Proposing pyrolysis for a circular economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Vitalii Naumov & Andrzej Szarata & Hanna Vasiutina, 2022. "Simulating a Macrosystem of Cargo Deliveries by Road Transport Based on Big Data Volumes: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Nusrat H. Zerin & Mohammad G. Rasul & M. I. Jahirul & A.S.M. Sayem & R. Haque, 2023. "Electrochemical Application of Activated Carbon Derived from End-of-Life Tyres: A Technological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Clivot, Hugues & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2023. "The crop residue conundrum: Maintaining long-term soil organic carbon stocks while reinforcing the bioeconomy, compatible endeavors?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:3:p:512-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.