IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i1p225-239.html

Exploring machine learning techniques to predict deforestation to enhance the decision‐making of road construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Larrea‐Gallegos
  • Ian Vázquez‐Rowe

Abstract

Land use changes (LUCs), which are defined as the modification in the use of land due to anthropogenic activities, are important sources of GHG emissions. In this context, understanding future trends of LUCs, such as deforestation, in a spatial manner is relevant. The main objective of this study is to generate a deforestation prediction model for a given period of time (i.e., 2002–2017 and 2010–2017) to estimate the potential carbon emissions associated with different anthropogenic variables in the Peruvian Amazon using machine learning (ML) algorithms. This study was motivated in the analysis of a road project previously studied using life cycle assessment (LCA). Models using neural networks and random forest algorithms were trained and evaluated in a fully cloud‐based environment using Google Earth Engine. ML‐related results demonstrated that random forest is a quicker and straightforward response to model the system under study, especially considering that data do not require additional processing during the modeling and prediction stages. Predicted results suggest that expected road expansion may be related to considerable carbon emissions in the future. Calculated values are relevant especially if the mitigation efforts that Peru has complied with in the Paris Agreement are considered. The increased complexity of the framework is justified since it allows identifying the location of hotspots and may potentially complement the utility of LCA in policy support in the areas of territorial planning and tropical road expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Larrea‐Gallegos & Ian Vázquez‐Rowe, 2022. "Exploring machine learning techniques to predict deforestation to enhance the decision‐making of road construction projects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 225-239, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:225-239
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13185
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Rosa, Michele, 2018. "Land Use and Land-use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment: Green Modelling or Black Boxing?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 73-81.
    2. Robert Pontius & Wideke Boersma & Jean-Christophe Castella & Keith Clarke & Ton Nijs & Charles Dietzel & Zengqiang Duan & Eric Fotsing & Noah Goldstein & Kasper Kok & Eric Koomen & Christopher Lippitt, 2008. "Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(1), pages 11-37, March.
    3. Xiaobo Xue Romeiko & Zhijian Guo & Yulei Pang & Eun Kyung Lee & Xuesong Zhang, 2020. "Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Global Warming and Eutrophication Impacts from Corn Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Meyer, Hanna & Reudenbach, Christoph & Wöllauer, Stephan & Nauss, Thomas, 2019. "Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications – Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 411(C).
    5. Miranda, Juan José & Corral, Leonardo & Blackman, Allen & Asner, Gregory & Lima, Eirivelthon, 2016. "Effects of Protected Areas on Forest Cover Change and Local Communities: Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 288-307.
    6. Pierre Ploton & Frédéric Mortier & Maxime Réjou-Méchain & Nicolas Barbier & Nicolas Picard & Vivien Rossi & Carsten Dormann & Guillaume Cornu & Gaëlle Viennois & Nicolas Bayol & Alexei Lyapustin & Syl, 2020. "Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emre Tepe, 2024. "A random forests-based hedonic price model accounting for spatial autocorrelation," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 511-540, October.
    2. Wadoux, Alexandre M.J.-C. & Heuvelink, Gerard B.M. & de Bruin, Sytze & Brus, Dick J., 2021. "Spatial cross-validation is not the right way to evaluate map accuracy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    3. Wen, Bingbin & Landuyt, Dries & Verheyen, Kris & Waller, Donald M. & Blondeel, Haben, 2025. "Do European models of temperate forest ecological change apply in North America?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 509(C).
    4. David Mouillot & Laure Velez & Camille Albouy & Nicolas Casajus & Joachim Claudet & Vincent Delbar & Rodolphe Devillers & Tom B. Letessier & Nicolas Loiseau & Stéphanie Manel & Laura Mannocci & Jessic, 2024. "The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Sims, Katharine R.E. & Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M., 2017. "Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 8-28.
    6. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    7. Yang, Yuanyuan & Bao, Wenkai & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Scenario simulation of land system change in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Alexandra-Nicoleta Ciucu-Durnoi & Camelia Delcea, 2024. "Ecosystem Degradation in Romania: Exploring the Core Drivers," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Laura G. van Galen & Justin D. Stewart & Clara Qin & Adriana Corrales & Bethan F. Manley & E. Toby Kiers & Thomas W. Crowther & Michael E. Van Nuland, 2025. "Global divergence in plant and mycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Burak Güneralp & Michael K Reilly & Karen C Seto, 2012. "Capturing Multiscalar Feedbacks in Urban Land Change: A Coupled System Dynamics Spatial Logistic Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(5), pages 858-879, October.
    11. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Hyeseon Choi & Nash Jett DG. Reyes & Minsu Jeon & Lee-Hyung Kim, 2021. "Constructed Wetlands in South Korea: Current Status and Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Chao Xu & Didit O Pribadi & Dagmar Haase & Stephan Pauleit, 2020. "Incorporating spatial autocorrelation and settlement type segregation to improve the performance of an urban growth model," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1184-1200, September.
    14. Galarza, Francisco & Kámiche Zegarra, Joanna & Gómez de Zea, Rosario, 2023. "Roads and deforestation: do local institutions matter?," Working Papers 23-03, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    15. Danning Chen & Weifeng Chen & Xincun Zhu & Shugang Xie & Peiyu Du & Xiaolong Chen & Dong Lv, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Restoration Strategy of Ecological Security Pattern in the Yellow River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    16. Li, Shi-Hua & Lin, Wei, 2025. "A hybrid landscape metric-enhanced cellular automata model (LE-CA) for land use/land cover change simulation: An application to coastal wetlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    17. Aritta Suwarno & Meine van Noordwijk & Hans-Peter Weikard & Desi Suyamto, 2018. "Indonesia’s forest conversion moratorium assessed with an agent-based model of Land-Use Change and Ecosystem Services (LUCES)," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 211-229, February.
    18. Yuanyuan Yang & Shuwen Zhang & Jiuchun Yang & Xiaoshi Xing & Dongyan Wang, 2015. "Using a Cellular Automata-Markov Model to Reconstruct Spatial Land-Use Patterns in Zhenlai County, Northeast China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    19. de Freitas, Marcos Wellausen Dias & Muñoz, Pablo & dos Santos, João Roberto & Alves, Diógenes Salas, 2018. "Land use and cover change modelling and scenarios in the Upper Uruguay Basin (Brazil)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 128-144.
    20. Ali Ismaeel & Amos P. K. Tai & Erone Ghizoni Santos & Heveakore Maraia & Iris Aalto & Jan Altman & Jiří Doležal & Jonas J. Lembrechts & José Luís Camargo & Juha Aalto & Kateřina Sam & Lair Cristina Av, 2024. "Patterns of tropical forest understory temperatures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:225-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.