IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v24y2020i3p534-547.html

The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Federico E. Alice‐Guier
  • Frits Mohren
  • Pieter A. Zuidema

Abstract

The effect of logging on atmospheric carbon concentrations remains highly contested, especially in the tropics where it is associated to forest degradation. To contribute to this discussion, we estimated the carbon balance from logging natural tropical forests in Costa Rica through a life cycle accounting approach. Our system included all major life cycle processes at a regional level during one rotation period (15 years). We used mass flow analysis to trace biogenic carbon. Data were gathered from all logging operations in the Costa Rican NW region (107 management plants), a sample of industries transforming wood into final products (20 sawmills), and national reports. We estimated a surplus of −3.06 Mg C ha−1 15 year−1 stored within the system. When accounting for uncertainty and variability in a Monte Carlo analysis, the average balance shifted to −2.19 Mg C ha−1 15 year−1 with a 95% CI of −5.26 to 1.86. This confidence interval reveals probabilities of a net increase in atmospheric carbon due to harvesting although these are smaller than those from a system that acts as a reservoir. Our results provide evidence for the carbon neutrality of bio‐materials obtained from natural forests. We found that anthropogenic reservoirs play a determinant role in delaying carbon emissions and that these may explain differences with previous carbon balance studies on tropical forest management. Therefore, the climate mitigation potential of forest‐derived products is not exclusive to forest management, but measures should be considered throughout the processes of wood transformation, use, and disposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico E. Alice‐Guier & Frits Mohren & Pieter A. Zuidema, 2020. "The life cycle carbon balance of selective logging in tropical forests of Costa Rica," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 534-547, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:3:p:534-547
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piponiot, Camille & Derroire, Géraldine & Descroix, Laurent & Mazzei, Lucas & Rutishauser, Ervan & Sist, Plinio & Hérault, Bruno, 2018. "Assessing timber volume recovery after disturbance in tropical forests – A new modelling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 353-369.
    2. Gediminas JasineviÄ ius & Marcus Lindner & Emil Cienciala & Markku Tykkyläinen, 2018. "Carbon Accounting in Harvested Wood Products: Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Resulting in Larger Pools Compared to the IPCC Default Method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(1), pages 121-131, February.
    3. A. Baccini & S. J. Goetz & W. S. Walker & N. T. Laporte & M. Sun & D. Sulla-Menashe & J. Hackler & P. S. A. Beck & R. Dubayah & M. A. Friedl & S. Samanta & R. A. Houghton, 2012. "Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(3), pages 182-185, March.
    4. R. A. Houghton & Brett Byers & Alexander A. Nassikas, 2015. "A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO2," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1022-1023, December.
    5. Geng, Aixin & Yang, Hongqiang & Chen, Jiaxin & Hong, Yinxing, 2017. "Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 192-200.
    6. R. A. Houghton & D. L. Skole & Carlos A. Nobre & J. L. Hackler & K. T. Lawrence & W H. Chomentowski, 2000. "Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 301-304, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengwan Zhang & Ning Ma & Youneng Yang, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Assessment and Efficiency Measurement of Wood Processing Industry Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Swati Sinha Babu, 2024. "Is Agricultural Production Responsible for Environmental Degradation in India? Implications for Sustainability Based on Panel Data Analysis," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 16(3), pages 340-370, September.
    3. Bronson W Griscom & Peter W Ellis & Alessandro Baccini & Delon Marthinus & Jeffrey S Evans & Ruslandi, 2016. "Synthesizing Global and Local Datasets to Estimate Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Fluxes in Berau, Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Gilbert Ahamer, 2022. "Why Biomass Fuels Are Principally Not Carbon Neutral," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-39, December.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:8yfr7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mykola Gusti & Nicklas Forsell & Petr Havlik & Nikolay Khabarov & Florian Kraxner & Michael Obersteiner, 2019. "The sensitivity of the costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) to future socioeconomic drivers and its implications for mitigation policy design," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1123-1141, August.
    7. Nizar Ali & Muhammad Saad & Anwar Ali & Naveed Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmad Khan & Habib Ullah & Areeba Binte Imran, 2023. "Assessment of aboveground biomass and carbon stock of subtropical pine forest of Pakistan," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(7), pages 287-304.
    8. Jeremi s M t Balogh, 2020. "The Role of Agriculture in Climate Change: A Global Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 401-408.
    9. Arthur Fendrich & Yu Feng & Jean-Pierre Wigneron & Jerôme Chave & Arnan Araza & Zheyuan Li & Martin Herold & Jean Ometto & Luiz E. O. C. Aragão & Isabel Martinez Cano & Lei Zhu & Yidi Xu & Philippe Ci, 2025. "Human influence on Amazon’s aboveground carbon dynamics intensified over the last decade," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Nolte, Christoph & Gobbi, Beatriz & le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Piquer-Rodríguez, María & Butsic, Van & Lambin, Eric F., 2017. "Decentralized Land Use Zoning Reduces Large-scale Deforestation in a Major Agricultural Frontier," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-40.
    11. Numazawa, Camila T.D. & Numazawa, Sueo & Pacca, Sergio & John, Vanderley M., 2017. "Logging residues and CO2 of Brazilian Amazon timber: Two case studies of forest harvesting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 280-285.
    12. Wang, Qiang & Han, Xinyu, 2021. "Is decoupling embodied carbon emissions from economic output in Sino-US trade possible?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Usman, Muhammad & Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad, 2021. "What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 12-28.
    14. Alkimim, Akenya & Clarke, Keith C., 2018. "Land use change and the carbon debt for sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 65-73.
    15. Jim Hart & Bernardino D'Amico & Francesco Pomponi, 2021. "Whole‐life embodied carbon in multistory buildings: Steel, concrete and timber structures," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 403-418, April.
    16. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Iftikhar Yasin & Nawaz Ahmad & Saqib Amin & Nyla Sattar & Afsheen Hashmat, 2025. "Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13235-13255, June.
    18. Abman, Ryan & Carney, Conor, 2020. "Agricultural productivity and deforestation: Evidence from input subsidies and ethnic favoritism in Malawi," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Stéphane Guitet & Bruno Hérault & Quentin Molto & Olivier Brunaux & Pierre Couteron, 2015. "Spatial Structure of Above-Ground Biomass Limits Accuracy of Carbon Mapping in Rainforest but Large Scale Forest Inventories Can Help to Overcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Brendan Mackey & Cyril F. Kormos & Heather Keith & William R. Moomaw & Richard A. Houghton & Russell A. Mittermeier & David Hole & Sonia Hugh, 2020. "Understanding the importance of primary tropical forest protection as a mitigation strategy," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 763-787, May.
    21. Andreas Langner & Frédéric Achard & Christelle Vancutsem & Jean-Francois Pekel & Dario Simonetti & Giacomo Grassi & Kanehiro Kitayama & Mikiyasu Nakayama, 2015. "Assessment of Above-Ground Biomass of Borneo Forests through a New Data-Fusion Approach Combining Two Pan-Tropical Biomass Maps," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:3:p:534-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.