IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i1p47-58.html

Revaluation of Essential Work: The Example of Elderly Care in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard Bosch
  • Michaela Evans‐Borchers

Abstract

This article is about how labour in a sector can be upgraded through new labour market institutions by mobilizing political support across political camps, even if collective bargaining power through strong trade unions and employers' associations is insufficient. The article summarizes the results of several empirical research projects by the two authors on elderly care, in which the key players in the sector were interviewed. Institutional erosion in labour relations, with its particularly dynamic ‘force field’, is a key topic of recent institutional theories. In contrast, the analysis of the revitalization of successful institutional innovations for the upgrading of work plays a subordinate role. The field of elderly care in Germany is an example of the successful upgrading of key workers in this market‐oriented sector through a deliberate institutional change in the German industrial relations system.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Bosch & Michaela Evans‐Borchers, 2026. "Revaluation of Essential Work: The Example of Elderly Care in Germany," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 47-58, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:47-58
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.