IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v50y2019i4p331-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The British Home Stores pension scheme: privatised looting?

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Clark

Abstract

On entering administration, British Home Stores owed its pension scheme £571 million—a significant employment relations issue of historical wage theft by investor–owner managers. The article locates ‘lawful’ looting of business assets in a framework that builds on Ackerlof and Romer's theory of bankruptcy for profit and connects this to an empirical narrative on business re‐structuring at British Home Stores towards administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Clark, 2019. "The British Home Stores pension scheme: privatised looting?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 331-347, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:331-347
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12261
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian Clark & Chris Lawton & Clifford Stevenson & Tom Vickers & David Dahill, 2022. "A ‘place-based’ approach to work and employment: The end of reciprocity for ordinary working families and ‘giggers’ in a place," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 634-657, May.
    2. Chris Rees & Michael Gold, 2020. "Re‐connecting capitalism: prospects for the regulatory reform of the employee interest in UK takeovers," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 502-516, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:331-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.