IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v38y2023i4p936-950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The inequalities reduction through healthcare decentralisation in low‐middle income countries: The case of Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Giusti
  • Alberto Romolini
  • Niccolò Persiani

Abstract

Healthcare decentralisation is a model of public service management founds on the wider distribution of the decisional power about healthcare. The decision power is split by central government also with the local health authorities. Since the 1980s, at worldwide level this reform has being applied for guaranteeing equity, efficiency, quality and financial sustainability in the healthcare services provision. In the last years, healthcare decentralisation is happening especially in low‐middle income countries. With regard to the analysis of the effectiveness of decentralisation in healthcare, the obtained results are mixed. This study aims to investigate the contribution of management in the first steps of decentralisation's implementation for reducing health inequalities in Tunisia. To have the management's point of view, a survey was sent to all directors of the Tunisian regional hospitals. Health management was able to offer operative and timely solutions to the homogenisation and the improvement of healthcare services supply in Tunisia. For healthcare managers the guarantee of an equal and effective Tunisian healthcare system is into the application of a differentiated decentralisation. The differentiated decentralisation of healthcare system allows to resolve regional issues in Tunisia. These interventions permit to obtain consistent positive results about the satisfaction of Tunisian population health needs. The differentiated decentralisation of healthcare system could also be useful for similar countries, for example, of MENA are of low‐middle income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Giusti & Alberto Romolini & Niccolò Persiani, 2023. "The inequalities reduction through healthcare decentralisation in low‐middle income countries: The case of Tunisia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 936-950, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:936-950
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3632
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katie Willis & Sorayya Khan, 2009. "Health Reform in Latin America and Africa: decentralisation, participation and inequalities," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 991-1005.
    2. Bossert, Thomas, 1998. "Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1513-1527, November.
    3. Kjeld Møller Pedersen & Terkel Christiansen & Mickael Bech, 2005. "The Danish health care system: evolution ‐ not revolution ‐ in a decentralized system," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(S1), pages 41-57, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andersson, Krister P. & Cook, Nathan J. & Trautmann, Mark A. & Valdivieso, Patricio, 2025. "Inequality and its strain on local Governments: Do external interventions Help?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Kozlowski, Dawid & Worthington, Dave, 2015. "Use of queue modelling in the analysis of elective patient treatment governed by a maximum waiting time policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 331-338.
    3. Hudson Christopher G. & Dragomirecka Eva, 2019. "Decision Making in Psychiatric Reform: A Case Study of the Czech Experience," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 15-27, December.
    4. Kruse, Ioana & Pradhan, Menno & Sparrow, Robert, 2009. "Health Spending and Decentralization in Indonesia," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Frankfurt a.M. 2009 33, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    5. Johnson-Peretz, Jason & Chamie, Gabriel & Kakande, Elijah & Christian, Canice & Kamya, Moses R. & Akatukwasa, Cecilia & Atwine, Fred & Havlir, Diane V. & Camlin, Carol S., 2023. "Geographical, social, and political contexts of tuberculosis control and intervention, as reported by mid-level health managers in Uganda: ‘The activity around town’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    6. Alexandre Delamou & Fassou Mathias Grovogui & Lior Miller & Amy Nye & Mamadi Kourouma & Delphin Kolié & Tohanizé Goumou & Thomas J Bossert, 2023. "Implementation research protocol on the national community health policy in Guinea: A sequential mixed-methods study using a decision space approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Ramiro Guerrero & Sergio I. Prada & Dov Chernichovsky, 2014. "La doble descentralización en el sector salud: evaluación y alternativas de política pública," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 12019, Fedesarrollo.
    8. Kruse, Ioana & Pradhan, Menno & Sparrow, Robert, 2012. "Marginal benefit incidence of public health spending: Evidence from Indonesian sub-national data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 147-157.
    9. Anni Ankjær-Jensen & Pernille Rosling & Lone Bilde, 2006. "Variable prospective financing in the Danish hospital sector and the development of a Danish case-mix system," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 259-268, August.
    10. Mikael Ohrling & John Øvretveit & Mats Brommels, 2021. "Can management decentralisation resolve challenges faced by healthcare service delivery organisations? Findings for managers and researchers from a scoping review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 30-41, January.
    11. Pettersen, Inger Johanne & Nyland, Kari & Kaarboe, Katarina, 2012. "Governance and the functions of boards," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 269-275.
    12. Lydiksen, Nis & Greve, Jane & Jakobsen, Marie & Kristensen, Søren Rud, 2021. "Using national clinical guidelines to reduce practice variation – the case of Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 793-798.
    13. Torrisi, Gianpiero & Pike, Andy & Tomaney, John & Tselios, Vassilis, 2011. "Defining and measuring decentralisation: a critical review," MPRA Paper 51441, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Joseph Harris & Jonathan D. Shaffer, 2022. "Comparing disciplinary engagement in global health research across the social sciences," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(2), pages 439-454, March.
    15. Geiguen Shin & Byong‐Kuen Jhee, 2021. "Better service delivery, more satisfied citizens? The mediating effects of local government management capacity in South Korea," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 42-67, January.
    16. Harvy Joy Liwanag & Kaspar Wyss, 2018. "What conditions enable decentralization to improve the health system? Qualitative analysis of perspectives on decision space after 25 years of devolution in the Philippines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Yue Dong & Dipanwita Sarkar & Jayanta Sarkar, 2021. "Decentralization and health resource allocation: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," QuBE Working Papers 060, QUT Business School.
    18. Sian Hsiang‐Te Tsuei & Winnie (Chi‐Man) Yip, 2024. "How hospital autonomy affects provider payment reform effectiveness," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 1350-1369, September.
    19. Fournaise, Anders & Andersen-Ranberg, Karen & Lauridsen, Jørgen T. & Espersen, Kurt & Gudex, Claire & Bech, Mickael, 2023. "Conceptual framework for acute community health care services – Illustrated by assessing the development of services in Denmark," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    20. Hao, Yu & Liu, Jiahui & Lu, Zhi-Nan & Shi, Ruijie & Wu, Haitao, 2021. "Impact of income inequality and fiscal decentralization on public health: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 934-944.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:936-950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.