IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i1ne70096.html

Beyond Core‐Periphery: A Multidimensional Typology of Brazilian Regional Inventive Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Ludmilla Rodrigues Costa Gonçalves
  • Eduardo Gonçalves

Abstract

The geography of invention in Brazil is characterized by a profound and multi‐polarised structure that extends beyond a simple core‐periphery dichotomy. This paper demonstrates this complexity through a multidimensional analysis of inventive capacity (2000–2023), operationalised along four axes—‘how much’, ‘who’, ‘how’, and ‘what’ is invented—and measured with synthetic indices based on data from the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). The application of cluster and discriminant analyses reveals a system with eight distinct regional configurations, ranging from a hyper‐technological pole (São Paulo) and consolidated metropolitan hubs to specialised intermediate poles. A critical finding is the chronic deficit in the collaborative dimension (‘how’ invention occurs). The results provide a robust typology for context‐sensitive innovation policies and highlight the persistence of asymmetries that challenge regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludmilla Rodrigues Costa Gonçalves & Eduardo Gonçalves, 2026. "Beyond Core‐Periphery: A Multidimensional Typology of Brazilian Regional Inventive Capacity," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70096
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70096
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl & Heike Mayer, 2022. "Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: reorientation versus transformation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(11), pages 2125-2138, November.
    2. Dong Jin Shin & Brian H. S. Kim, 2025. "Analyzing the Dynamic Efficiency and Critical Factors of the Regional Innovation System: A Case Study of Korea," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 48(4), pages 437-459, July.
    3. Markus Grillitsch & Teis Hansen, 2019. "Green industry development in different types of regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 2163-2183, November.
    4. Michaela Trippl & Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Jannik Kastrup, 2024. "Challenge-oriented regional innovation systems: towards a research agenda," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 60, pages 105-116.
    5. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Dernis, Hélène & Guellec, Dominique & Picci, Lucio & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno, 2013. "The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 720-737.
    6. Bart Verspagen, 2010. "The spatial hierarchy of technological change and economic development in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 109-132, August.
    7. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2013. "Innovation and spatial inequality in Europe and USA," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Eduardo Goncalves & Eduardo Almeida, 2009. "Innovation and Spatial Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Brazilian Patent Data," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 513-528.
    9. Michael Fritsch, 2002. "Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 86-101, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knut Koschatzky & Hendrik Hansmeier, 2026. "Structural and transformative change as central challenges for regional development," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 46(1), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Hendrik Hansmeier & Knut Koschatzky & Thomas Stahlecker, 2026. "Lagging regions between economic restructuring and addressing societal challenges," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 46(1), pages 11-29, March.
    3. Rinaldo Evangelista & Valentina Meliciani & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "Fast Growing and Key Enabling Technologies and their impact on regional growth inEurope," Working Papers 42, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2021.
    4. Michaela Trippl & Sebastian Fastenrath & Arne Isaksen, 2022. "Rethinking regional economic resilience: Preconditions and processes shaping transformative resilience," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2022(02), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    5. Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Balazs Pager & Michaela Trippl, 2024. "Regions in industrial transitions: exploring the uneven geographies of vulnerability, preparedness and responsiveness," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2024(03), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    6. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Schoen, Anja & Wastyn, Annelies, 2014. "Selection bias in innovation studies: A simple test," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 287-299.
    7. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    8. Seungwoo Han, 2022. "Spatial stratification and socio-spatial inequalities: the case of Seoul and Busan in South Korea," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Qiong Liu & Junhua Guo, 2025. "The Effects of Government R&D Investment and Policy Ambiguity on Regional Innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8060-8084, June.
    11. Hellsmark, Hans & Hansen, Teis, 2020. "A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Su, Hsin-Ning, 2017. "Collaborative and Legal Dynamics of International R&D- Evolving Patterns in East Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 217-227.
    13. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    14. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    15. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "Is There Trickle-Down from Tech? Poverty, Employment, and the High-Technology Multiplier in U.S. Cities," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(5), pages 1114-1134, September.
    16. Ferrucci, Edoardo, 2020. "Migration, innovation and technological diversion: German patenting after the collapse of the Soviet Union," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    17. Patricia Peñalosa & Carolina Castaldi, 2024. "Horizon Europe: a green window of opportunity for european peripheral regions?," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(3), pages 251-285, September.
    18. Christine Greenhalgh, 2013. "Science, Technology, Innovation and IP in India: New Directions and Prospects," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n37, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    19. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Antoine Schoen, 2019. "Worldwide IP coverage of patented inventions in large pharma firms: to what extent do the internationalisation of R&D and firm strategy matter?," Post-Print hal-01725229, HAL.
    20. Fragkandreas, Thanos, 2025. "Case study research on innovation systems: Paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.