IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026i2p189-199.html

A Framework for Evaluating Global AI Governance Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Huw Roberts
  • Mariarosaria Taddeo
  • Luciano Floridi

Abstract

Efforts to develop global governance initiatives for artificial intelligence (AI) have increased significantly in recent years. However, these initiatives have generally had a limited impact due to their vagueness, lack of authority and repetition. Several factors contribute to the difficulties in establishing effective global AI governance mechanisms, including geopolitical tensions, institutional gridlock, and the general‐purpose and sociotechnical characteristics of AI. Developing politically legitimate governance mechanisms that can operate within these constraints and effectively compel behaviour change among government and industry actors is essential for building a more mature global AI governance ecosystem. In this article, we contribute to this aim by introducing a framework for evaluating the political legitimacy of global governance initiatives. It is designed to clarify why many global AI governance initiatives lack authority and to identify opportunities for more impactful international cooperation. We operationalise the framework by assessing global AI governance initiatives which address two international security problems: establishing regulation for lethal autonomous weapon systems and implementing safety testing for general‐purpose AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Huw Roberts & Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi, 2026. "A Framework for Evaluating Global AI Governance Initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 189-199, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70164
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tallberg, Jonas & Lundgren, Magnus & Geith, Johannes, 2024. "AI regulation in the European Union: examining non-state actor preferences," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 218-239, June.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:ubxgk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Inga Ulnicane, 2025. "Governance fix? Power and politics in controversies about governing generative AI," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 44(1), pages 70-84.
    4. Cantero Gamito, Marta, 2023. "The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    5. Peter Cihon & Matthijs M. Maas & Luke Kemp, 2020. "Fragmentation and the Future: Investigating Architectures for International AI Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(5), pages 545-556, November.
    6. Jonas Tallberg & Michael Zürn, 2019. "The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 581-606, December.
    7. Thomas Gehring & Benjamin Faude, 2014. "A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 471-498, December.
    8. Seokki Cha, 2024. "Towards an international regulatory framework for AI safety: lessons from the IAEA’s nuclear safety regulations," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Veale, Michael & Matus, Kira & Gorwa, Robert, 2023. "AI and Global Governance: Modalities, Rationales, Tensions," SocArXiv ubxgk, Center for Open Science.
    10. Sylvia I. Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen & Antto Vihma, 2009. "Comparing the legitimacy and effectiveness of global hard and soft law: An analytical framework," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 400-420, December.
    11. Veale, Michael & Matus, Kira & Gorwa, Robert, 2023. "AI and Global Governance: Modalities, Rationales, Tensions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19, pages 255-275.
    12. Inga Ulnicane & Aini Aden, 2023. "Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 665-687, September.
    13. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew J. Keith, 2024. "Governance of artificial intelligence in Southeast Asia," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(5), pages 937-954, November.
    2. Esmat Zaidan & Imad Antoine Ibrahim, 2024. "AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Julia Gray, 2024. "The life cycle of international cooperation: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 641-664, October.
    4. Rotte, Ralph & Alberty, Victoria & Dürholt, Andreas & Geiser, René, 2026. "Safeguards, Strategic Behavior, and Great Power Competition: The IAEA’s Board of Governors as an Instrument of Leverage for Potential Non- Compliers," SocArXiv kpx45_v2, Center for Open Science.
    5. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    6. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Faude, Benjamin, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Ho Ting Hung, 2025. "Exploring China’s cyber sovereignty concept and artificial intelligence governance model: a machine learning approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Katherine M. Beall, 2024. "Empowering to constrain: Procedural checks in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 443-468, September.
    9. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    10. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    11. Zürn, Michael & Faude, Benjamin & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, 2018. "Overlapping spheres of authority and interface conflicts in the global order: Introducing a DFG research group," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2018-103, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Daniel Berliner, 2016. "Transnational advocacy and domestic law: International NGOs and the design of freedom of information laws," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 121-144, March.
    13. Lea Steininger & Casimir Hesse, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp357, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    14. Harriet Goers & Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham & Laia Balcells, 2025. "Internal drivers of self-rule referendums," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(3), pages 308-327, May.
    15. David Ciplet, 2014. "Contesting Climate Injustice: Transnational Advocacy Network Struggles for Rights in UN Climate Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(4), pages 75-96, November.
    16. Hintz, Arne & Dencik, Lina, 2016. "The politics of surveillance policy: UK regulatory dynamics after Snowden," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16.
    17. Hyoung‐Kyu Chey, 2007. "Do markets enhance convergence on international standards? The case of financial regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 295-311, December.
    18. Antje Wiener, 2016. "Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 20-36.
    19. Moshe Maor, 2017. "Policy entrepreneurs in policy valuation processes: The case of the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1401-1417, December.
    20. Cedric Dawkins, 2014. "The Principle of Good Faith: Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 283-295, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.