IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/kpx45_v2.html

Safeguards, Strategic Behavior, and Great Power Competition: The IAEA’s Board of Governors as an Instrument of Leverage for Potential Non- Compliers

Author

Listed:
  • Rotte, Ralph

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Alberty, Victoria
  • Dürholt, Andreas
  • Geiser, René

Abstract

This paper takes a critical view of the prospective ability of the IAEA to be an essential contributor to a stable international nuclear order and prevention of nuclear proliferation, given that it is an international governmental organization. The Agency is considered to be characterized by the ambiguities of a more or less autonomous bureaucratic and technocratic organization led by the Secretariat. Furthermore, it is considered an intergovernmental arena of state actors for decision-making on the political consequences of breaking Safeguards rules with the Boards of Governors as a quasi-upstream body of the UN Security Council. As is typical for IGOs one can therefore expect it to ultimately be an instrument of states’ foreign policy interests which reflects the overall situation of the international system and its prevalent power structures and conflicts. Especially in times of power transition and a revisionist dissolution of an established international order this may lead to rivalling great powers’ acting according to their strategic priorities and protecting states that fail to fully comply with nuclear safeguards obligations, instead of providing for effective implementation of non-proliferation measures. As a consequence, this instrumentalization of the IAEA policy making bodies by leading powers’ strategic interests might enable unreliable countries to avoid diplomatic pressure or sanctions for clandestine cheating or even to whitewash their nuclear programs. By looking at the cases of Iran, South Korea, Egypt and Libya, we find that alliance politics and strategic behavior may indeed hamper the effectiveness of the IAEA as the global nuclear watchdog. Consequently, at least from a realist and strategic studies perspective, the IAEA and the nuclear nonproliferation regime face an ever-increasing structural challenge in the current context of aggravating great power competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Rotte, Ralph & Alberty, Victoria & Dürholt, Andreas & Geiser, René, 2026. "Safeguards, Strategic Behavior, and Great Power Competition: The IAEA’s Board of Governors as an Instrument of Leverage for Potential Non- Compliers," SocArXiv kpx45_v2, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:kpx45_v2
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/kpx45_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a412cbd35357cd28e9df24a/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/kpx45_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lall, Ranjit, 2017. "Beyond Institutional Design: Explaining the Performance of International Organizations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(2), pages 245-280, April.
    2. Marieke Louis & Lucile Maertens, 2021. "Why International Organizations Hate Politics : Depoliticizing the World," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03187782, HAL.
    3. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    4. Marieke Louis & Lucile Maertens, 2021. "Why International Organizations Hate Politics : Depoliticizing the World," Post-Print hal-03187782, HAL.
    5. Jonas Tallberg & Michael Zürn, 2019. "The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 581-606, December.
    6. Nilsson, Adriana, 2017. "Making norms to tackle global challenges: The role of Intergovernmental Organisations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 171-181.
    7. Sommerer, Thomas & Squatrito, Theresa & Tallberg, Jonas & Lundgren, Magnus, 2021. "Decision-making in international organizations: institutional design and performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111834, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hylke Dijkstra & Farsan Ghassim, 2025. "Are authoritative international organizations challenged more? A recurrent event analysis of member state criticisms and withdrawals," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 907-935, December.
    2. Tom Hunter & Stefanie Walter, 2026. "International organizations in national parliamentary debates," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 41-67, March.
    3. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    5. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    6. Chee, Liberty, 2023. "The Problem of Domestic Work at the International Labour Organization," SocArXiv bfm3s, Center for Open Science.
    7. Alexander Baturo & Julia Gray, 2024. "Leaders in the United Nations General Assembly: Revitalization or politicization?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 721-752, October.
    8. Coen, David & Kreienkamp, Julia & Tokhi, Alexandros & Pegram, Tom, 2022. "Making global public policy work: A survey of international organization effectiveness," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 656-668.
    9. Hayford Asare Obeng & Tarik Atan, 2025. "The Public Hospital Exodus: Unraveling the Interplay of Turnover Intentions and Organizational Politics," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
    10. Julia Gray, 2024. "The life cycle of international cooperation: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 641-664, October.
    11. Cornelius Friesendorf & Ronny Patz, 2025. "International Bureaucracies as Constrained Entrepreneurs: The Budget Crisis of the OSCE," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 874-884, November.
    12. Huw Roberts & Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi, 2026. "A Framework for Evaluating Global AI Governance Initiatives," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 189-199, May.
    13. David Coen & Julia Kreienkamp & Alexandros Tokhi & Tom Pegram, 2022. "Making global public policy work: A survey of international organization effectiveness," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 656-668, November.
    14. Katherine M. Beall, 2024. "Empowering to constrain: Procedural checks in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 443-468, September.
    15. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2023. "Overlapping regionalism around the world: Introducing the overlapping regionalism dataset," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 449-463, December.
    16. Lea Steininger & Casimir Hesse, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp357, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    17. Antje Wiener, 2016. "Contested Norms in Inter-National Encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a Prelude to Fairer Fisheries Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 20-36.
    18. Catherine E De Vries & Simon Hix & Miriam Sorace, 2025. "Reforming supranational institutions: Insights from a conjoint experiment in 16 countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(4), pages 649-666, December.
    19. Bernhard Reinsberg & Martin C. Steinwand, 2025. "Lead or Follow? Participation Decisions in Collective Development Initiatives," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 811-825, July.
    20. Alexander Kentikelenis & Erik Voeten, 2021. "Legitimacy challenges to the liberal world order: Evidence from United Nations speeches, 1970–2018," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 721-754, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:kpx45_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.