IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i5p797-804.html

Civic ecosystems and social innovation: From collaboration to complementarity

Author

Listed:
  • Iavor Rangelov
  • Marika Theros

Abstract

This article introduces civic ecosystems as a concept and set of practical approaches to social innovation. It draws on several examples of civic ecosystems in action to highlight their main characteristics and to provide insights and lessons for applying ecosystem approaches to social innovation in practice. The discussion of civic ecosystems is placed in the broader context of the rise of ecosystem thinking among social change practitioners, researchers, technologists and funders. The article argues for a paradigm shift in social innovation from networks as vehicles for collaboration to ecosystems as catalysts for complementarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Iavor Rangelov & Marika Theros, 2023. "Civic ecosystems and social innovation: From collaboration to complementarity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 797-804, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:797-804
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13248
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helfat, Constance E. & Raubitschek, Ruth S., 2018. "Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1391-1399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Danuso, Anna & Giones, Ferran & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2022. "The digital transformation of industrial players," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 341-349.
    3. Cenamor, Javier & Frishammar, Johan, 2021. "Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    4. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    5. Agarwal, Renu & Mittal, Neeraj & Patterson, Eric & Giorcelli, Michela, 2021. "Evolution of the Indian LPG industry: Exploring conditions for public sector business model innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    6. Wang Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of the Platform Economy on Urban–Rural Integration Development: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Lei Shen & Xi Zhang & Hongda Liu, 2022. "Digital technology adoption, digital dynamic capability, and digital transformation performance of textile industry: Moderating role of digital innovation orientation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2038-2054, September.
    9. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    10. Lyudmila A. Ramenskaya, 2020. "The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 16-28, September.
    11. Hui Zhang & Jin-Biao Yi & Qian Wang, 2021. "Research on the Collaborative Evolution of Blockchain Industry Ecosystems in Terms of Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Thomas, Llewellyn D.W. & Snihur, Yuliya, 2025. "Ecosystem framing and infomediary resonance: Amazon’s early years (1995–2003)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Peter W. de Langen & Henrik Sornn-Friese & James Hallworth, 2020. "The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Jing Zeng & Yunlu Yang & Soo Hee Lee, 2023. "Resource Orchestration and Scaling‐up of Platform‐Based Entrepreneurial Firms: The Logic of Dialectic Tuning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 605-638, May.
    16. Audra Wormald & Sonali K. Shah & Serguey Braguinsky & Rajshree Agarwal, 2023. "Pioneering digital platform ecosystems: The role of aligned capabilities and motives in shaping key choices and performance outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7), pages 1653-1697, July.
    17. Hélène Yildiz & Alan Reiter & Jean-Pierre Mouline & Mohamed Ouiakoub, 2024. "L'engagement virtuel incarné : Conséquences sur les entreprises du segment de MMOG," Post-Print hal-04526252, HAL.
    18. Praveen K. Kopalle & V. Kumar & Mohan Subramaniam, 2020. "How legacy firms can embrace the digital ecosystem via digital customer orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 114-131, January.
    19. Francis Donbesuur & Nadia Zahoor & Samuel Adomako, 2021. "Postformation alliance capabilities and environmental innovation: The roles of environmental in‐learning and relation‐specific investments," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3330-3343, November.
    20. Azni Zarina Taha & Mozard Mohtar & Mahfuzur Rahman & Thamil Maran Periannan & Noor Ismawati Jaafar & Tey Lian Seng, 2025. "The impact of technology orientation, technology opportunism, and change orientation on the firm operational performance: a moderated-mediation analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 89-110, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:797-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.