IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020i5p557-568.html

The US and EU’s Intellectual Property Initiatives in Asia: Competition, Coordination or Replication?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean‐Frédéric Morin
  • Madison Cartwright

Abstract

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) have been a priority for the European Union and the United States. However, over the past two decades, the EU and US have failed to advance their preferred IPRs standards through multilateral forums and have pursued bilateral alternatives instead. How have the EU and US pursued their strategies in this fragmented environment? Looking specifically at the Asia‐Pacific, we compare their bilateral initiatives on IPRs across three strategies: treaty‐making, coercion and socialization. Through this analysis, we examine whether the EU and US’s bilateral actions indicate regulatory competition, coordination or replication. We find that the overall tendency has been towards replication, which raises questions about the reasons for this redundancy and its policy consequences. As the rise of bilateralism is not unique to IPRs, our findings have implications for global governance more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean‐Frédéric Morin & Madison Cartwright, 2020. "The US and EU’s Intellectual Property Initiatives in Asia: Competition, Coordination or Replication?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(5), pages 557-568, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:5:p:557-568
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12885
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Horn & Petros C. Mavroidis & André Sapir, 2010. "Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1565-1588, November.
    2. Archibugi, Daniele & Filippetti, Andrea, 2010. "The globalisation of intellectual property rights: four learned lessons and four theses," MPRA Paper 21930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sell,Susan K., 2003. "Private Power, Public Law," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521819145.
    4. Matthew David & Debora J. Halbert, 2017. "Intellectual Property & Global Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 149-158, May.
    5. Jean-Frédéric Morin & Richard E. Gold, 2014. "An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/149496, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Jean-Frédéric Morin, 2020. "Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providers," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-107, January.
    7. David Lake, 2009. "Open economy politics: A critical review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 219-244, September.
    8. Hannah Murphy & Aynsley Kellow, 2013. "Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 139-149, May.
    9. Hayes, Dermot J. & Lence, Sergio H. & Babcock, Bruce A., 2005. "Geographic Indications and Farmer-Owned Brands: Why Do the U.S. And E.U. Disagree?," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12418, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Sell,Susan K., 2003. "Private Power, Public Law," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521525398.
    11. Henry Farrell & Abraham Newman, 2016. "The new interdependence approach: theoretical development and empirical demonstration," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 713-736, September.
    12. Morin, Jean-Frédéric & Surbeck, Jenny, 2020. "Mapping the New Frontier of International IP Law: Introducing a TRIPs-plus Dataset," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 109-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rawi Abdelal, 2010. "The Profits of Power: Commercial Realpolitik in Europe and Eurasia," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-028, Harvard Business School, revised Mar 2011.
    2. Dan Prud’homme & Tony W. Tong & Nianchen Han, 2021. "A stakeholder-based view of the evolution of intellectual property institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 773-802, June.
    3. Matthew David & Debora J. Halbert, 2017. "Intellectual Property & Global Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 149-158, May.
    4. Jean-Frédéric Morin, 2020. "Concentration despite competition: The organizational ecology of technical assistance providers," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-107, January.
    5. Susanne Lütz, 2021. "Global–Regional Realignments in Trade, Finance and Development: Introduction to the Special Issue," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 5-13, May.
    6. Mohammad Yamin, 2011. "A Commentary on Peter Buckley’s Writings on the Global Factory," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 285-293, April.
    7. Flynn, Matthew B., 2021. "Global capitalism as a societal determinant of health: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Blandine Laperche, 2008. "Stratégies d’innovation des firmes des sciences de la vie et appropriation des ressources végétales : processus et enjeux Innovations strategies of firms in life science and appropriation of vegetal resources : process and stakes," Working Papers 189, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    9. Amandine Bled, 2009. "Business to the rescue: private sector actors and global environmental regimes’ legitimacy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 153-171, May.
    10. Jandhyala, Srividya, 2015. "International and domestic dynamics of intellectual property protection," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 284-293.
    11. Chen, Wantao & Yu, Xiang & Yang, Wei, 2024. "Is worldwide patent protection converging? A cross-country index of patent protection strength 1990–2020," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. David Clayton, 2011. "Trade‐Offs And Rip‐Offs: Imitation‐Led Industrialisation And The Evolution Of Trademark Law In Hong Kong," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 51(2), pages 178-198, July.
    13. Gleeson, Deborah & Lexchin, Joel & Labonté, Ronald & Townsend, Belinda & Gagnon, Marc-André & Kohler, Jillian & Forman, Lisa & Shadlen, Kenneth C., 2019. "Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103027, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Christopher May, 2006. "Escaping the TRIPs’ Trap: The Political Economy of Free and Open Source Software in Africa," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(1), pages 123-146, March.
    15. Bayer, Patrick & Marcoux, Christopher & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2013. "Leveraging private capital for climate mitigation: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-24.
    16. Mohammed El Said, 2020. "Radical Approaches During Unusual Circumstances: Intellectual Property Regulation and the COVID-19 Dilemma," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 63(2), pages 209-218, December.
    17. Archibugi, Daniele & Filippetti, Andrea, 2010. "The globalisation of intellectual property rights: four learned lessons and four theses," MPRA Paper 21930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Gjølberg Maria, 2011. "Explaining Regulatory Preferences: CSR, Soft Law, or Hard Law? Insights from a Survey of Nordic Pioneers in CSR," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, August.
    19. Anne Roemer-Mahler, 2013. "Business conflict and global politics: The pharmaceutical industry and the global protection of intellectual property rights," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 121-152, February.
    20. Singh, J.P. & Flyverbom, Mikkel, 2016. "Representing participation in ICT4D projects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 692-703.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:5:p:557-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.