IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v21y2014i6p559-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflexivity and the Construction of Competing Discourses of Masculinity in a Female-Dominated Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Adamson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Adamson, 2014. "Reflexivity and the Construction of Competing Discourses of Masculinity in a Female-Dominated Profession," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 559-572, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:21:y:2014:i:6:p:559-572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/gwao.12058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penny Dick & Catherine Cassell, 2002. "Barriers to Managing Diversity in a UK Constabulary: The Role of Discourse," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(7), pages 953-976, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan Sangster & Julia Smith, 2016. "Beards and Bloomers: Flight Attendants, Grievances and Embodied Labour in the Canadian Airline Industry, 1960s–1980s," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 183-199, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bairoh, Susanna, 2008. "Current Debates on Classifying Diversity Management: Review and a Proposal," Working Papers 534, Hanken School of Economics.
    2. Annette Risberg & Hervé Corvellec, 2022. "The significance of trying: How organizational members meet the ambiguities of diversity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1849-1867, November.
    3. Patricia Garcia-Prieto Sol & Diane Mackie & Eliot Smith, 2009. "Intergroup emotion antecedents of reactions toward diversity initiatives," Working Papers CEB 09-008.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen & González- Rodríguez, M. Rosario & Simonetti, Biagio, 2020. "Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 157-168.
    5. André Spicer & Graham Sewell, 2010. "From National Service to Global Player: Transforming the Organizational Logic of a Public Broadcaster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 913-943, September.
    6. Kate Linklater, 2022. "Inclusion Capital: How Police Officers Are Included in Their Workplaces," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Välikangas, Anita & Seeck, Hannele, 2011. "Exploring the Foucauldian interpretation of power and subject in organizations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49807, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Anne R. van Ewijk, 2014. "Meanings and Motives before Measures: The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Diversity within the Mossos d’Esquadra and the Politie Utrecht," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 060-074.
    9. Nina van Douwen & Marieke van den Brink & Yvonne Benschop, 2022. "Badass marines: Resistance practices against the introduction of women in the Dutch military," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1443-1462, September.
    10. Ebrahim Soltani & Jawad Syed & Ying-Ying Liao & Nasrollah Shahi-Sough, 2012. "Tackling one-sidedness in equality and diversity research: Characteristics of the current dominant approach to managing diverse workgroups in Iran," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 9-37, March.
    11. Eline Jammaers, 2023. "Theorizing Discursive Resistance to Organizational Ethics of Care Through a Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Disability Inclusion Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 333-345, March.
    12. Ghorashi, Halleh & Sabelis, Ida, 2013. "Juggling difference and sameness: Rethinking strategies for diversity in organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 78-86.
    13. Van den Brink, Marieke & Stobbe, Lineke, 2014. "The support paradox: Overcoming dilemmas in gender equality programs," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 163-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:21:y:2014:i:6:p:559-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.