IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v48y1972i2p290-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Weighting Problem in the Calculation of Effective Rates of Protection:A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • James R. Melvin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • James R. Melvin, 1972. "A Weighting Problem in the Calculation of Effective Rates of Protection:A Comment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 48(2), pages 290-292, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:2:p:290-292
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb01559.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb01559.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1972.tb01559.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bela Balassa, 1965. "Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(6), pages 573-573.
    2. W. M. Corden, 1966. "The Structure of a Tariff System and the Effective Protective Rate," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(3), pages 221-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Paul Schultz, 2006. "Does the Liberalization of Trade Advance Gender Equality in Schooling and Health?," Working Papers 935, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    2. Zhaohui Niu & Chang Liu & Saileshsingh Gunessee & Chris Milner, 2018. "Non-tariff and overall protection: evidence across countries and over time," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(4), pages 675-703, November.
    3. Lindland, Jostein, 1997. "The impact of the Uruguay Round on tariff escalation in agricultural products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 487-500, December.
    4. Rouzet, Dorothée & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2013. "The Cumulative Impact of Trade Barriers along the Value Chain: An Empirical Assessment using the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Model," Conference papers 332366, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. J Fedderke & P Vaze, 2001. "THE NATURE OF SOUTH AFRICA'S TRADE PATTERNS BY ECONOMIC SECTOR, AND THE EXTENT OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION DURING THE COURSE OF THE 1990′s," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(3), pages 436-478, September.
    6. Kanika Pathania & Aditya Bhattacharjea, 2020. "Inverted Duty Structures and the Paradox of Negative Effective Protection in India, 2000–2014," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(2), pages 139-167, May.
    7. Marks, Stephen V., 2011. "Lao economic policies and effective rates of protection," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 115-127, April.
    8. repec:phd:pjdevt:jpd_1987_vol__xiv_no__1-c is not listed on IDEAS
    9. T. Paul Schultz, 1982. "Effective Protection and the Distribution of Personal Income by Sector in Colombia," NBER Chapters, in: Trade and Employment in Developing Countries, Volume 2: Factor Supply and Substitution, pages 83-148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Jean Waelbroeck, 1976. "Measuring the Degree or Progress of Economic Integration (Main Paper, Working Group A)," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/10934, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Aaron Flaaen & Justin R. Pierce, 2019. "Disentangling the Effects of the 2018-2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-086, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    12. Maria Cipollina & Luca Salvatici, 2008. "Measuring Protection: Mission Impossible?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 577-616, July.
    13. Jie Wu & Chan‐Guk Huh & Jacob Wood, 2021. "Globally chained economies, unwitting victims of the US‐China trade war," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 35(2), pages 60-76, November.
    14. Joseph S Shapiro, 2021. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 831-886.
    15. Antimiani, Alessandro & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Salvatici, Luca, 2016. "Value Added Trade Restrictiveness Indexes. Measuring Protection with Global Value Chains," Conference papers 332745, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Gerard Mosiej, 2002. "Evolution of the Role and Conception of the Customs Policy in the Economic Theory and Practice," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 8.
    17. Garred, Jason, 2018. "The persistence of trade policy in China after WTO accession," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 130-142.
    18. Allan Webster, 1991. "Assessing Fiscal Incentives: An Effective Rate of Protection Analysis of Benin," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 243-264, September.
    19. Juthathip Jongwanich & Archanun Kohpaiboon, 2017. "Trade Protection and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Thai Manufacturing," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 55(2), pages 130-157, June.
    20. Manwa, Farai & Wijeweera, Albert, 2016. "Trade liberalisation and economic growth link: The case of Southern African Custom Union countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-21.
    21. Luke Willard, 2000. "Does Openness Promote Growth?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 251-261.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:48:y:1972:i:2:p:290-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.