IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v46y2026i2p269-284.html

Ephemeral capital: How memepreneurs profit from memes

Author

Listed:
  • Kris Kaleta

Abstract

This article offers an Austrian market‐process theory of internet memes, framing them as plan‐relative symbolic capital goods. It integrates Menger's goods taxonomy with Lachmannian capital heterogeneity to model memetic templates as durable goods and their instances as rapidly depreciating novelty services. Under Knightian uncertainty, actors on the memetic market discover attentional disequilibria, earning dual returns in the form of immediate monetisation and option‐like social capital convertible via contract. A hermeneutic layer (Lavoie–Storr) clarifies how shared meanings shape usability. The analysis identifies three institutional vulnerabilities that generate noise and slow discovery in this market. It concludes with institutional implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kris Kaleta, 2026. "Ephemeral capital: How memepreneurs profit from memes," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 269-284, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:269-284
    DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.70034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.70034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecaf.70034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Don Lavoie, 2011. "The interpretive dimension of economics: Science, hermeneutics, and praxeology," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 91-128, June.
    2. Harold Demsetz, 1968. "The Cost of Transacting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(1), pages 33-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huh, Yesol & Kim, You Suk, 2023. "Cheapest-to-deliver pricing, optimal MBS securitization, and welfare implications," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 68-93.
    2. Venkat Eleswarapu & Chandrasekar Krishnamurti, 1995. "Liquidity, stock returns and ownership structure: an empirical study of the BSE," Finance 9507005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lebelle, Martin & Lajili Jarjir, Souad & Sassi, Syrine, 2022. "The effect of issuance documentation disclosure and readability on liquidity: Evidence from green bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Demsetz, Harold, 1997. "Limit orders and the alleged Nasdaq collusion," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 91-95, July.
    5. Rosita P. Chang & Sang-Hyop Lee & Sean F. Reid & S. Ghon Rhee, 2002. "One-Way Arbitrage-Based Interest Parity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-115/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Eric C. Edwards & Martin Fiszbein & Gary D. Libecap, 2022. "Property Rights to Land and Agricultural Organization: An Argentina–United States Comparison," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(S1), pages 1-33.
    7. Saunders, Anthony & Shao, Pei & Xiao, Yuchao, 2024. "Private information disclosure in the secondary loan market and its impact on equity market trading costs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Krassimira Naydenova, 2018. "Built-In Problems in the New European Regulations for the Bulgarian Capital Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 106-134.
    9. Jan-Peter Siedlarek & Vladimir Yankov, 2025. "The Secondary Market for Syndicated Loans," Working Papers 25-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    10. Oscar Jorda & Holly Liu & Jeffrey Williams, 2003. "Non-Institutional Market Making Behavior: The Dalian Futures Exchange," Working Papers 41, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    11. Hadeel Yaseen & Ghassan Omet & Morad Abdel-Halim, 2015. "The 2008 Global Financial Crisis: The Case of a Market with Consistent Losses Ever Since," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 8-19.
    12. Ulibarri, Carlos A. & Schatzberg, John, 2003. "Liquidity costs: Screen-based trading versus open outcry," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 381-396.
    13. Jamshed Y. Uppal, 2009. "The Role of Satellite Stock Exchanges: A Case Study of the Lahore Stock Exchange," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 1-47, Jul-Dec.
    14. Jayme Lemke & Jonathan Lingenfelter, 2017. "A Practical Approach to Understanding: The Possibilities and Limitations of Applied Work in Political Economy," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy, volume 22, pages 67-88, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    15. Benjamin M. Blau & Todd G. Griffith & Ryan J. Whitby, 2020. "Opacity and the comovement in the stock prices of banks," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3557-3580, December.
    16. Menyah, Kojo & Paudyal, Krishna, 2000. "The components of bid-ask spreads on the London Stock Exchange," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(11), pages 1767-1785, November.
    17. Flannery, Mark J. & Kwan, Simon H. & Nimalendran, Mahendrarajah, 2013. "The 2007–2009 financial crisis and bank opaqueness," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 55-84.
    18. Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School.
      • Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    19. Francis X. Diebold & Georg H. Strasser, 2008. "On the Correlation Structure of Microstructure Noise in Theory and Practice," PIER Working Paper Archive 08-038, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    20. Åke E. Andersson & Börje Johansson, 2018. "Inside and outside the black box: organization of interdependencies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 501-516, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:269-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.