IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022i1ne12556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Northernization for Breaking‐through International Isolation: Taiwan’s Trilateral Aid Cooperation in the Middle East Refugee Crisis and beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Yi‐Chen Wu
  • Shiuh‐Shen Chien

Abstract

Motivation Taiwan, a de facto independent state, previously preferred bilateral aid focused on its diplomatic partners in response to China’s efforts to isolate the country internationally. More recently, Taiwan has been active in trilateral aid co‐operation with many international agencies supporting work in camps for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) and host communities in the Middle East and beyond. Purpose The article analyses how and under what circumstances Taiwan’s South–North–South (SNS) co‐operation functions, which differs from the conventional trilateral North–South–South (NSS) model. We argue that Taiwan’s trilateral aid is a desire for “Northernization” in the global aid hierarchy in order to break through its political isolation. Methods and approach The research included the collection of government documents and media reports as well as field research and off‐the‐record interviews in Jordan and Taiwan. We visited Jordan for a month each in 2018 and 2019. Findings Taiwan’s top three partners in trilateral aid co‐operation are the United States (US) and related organizations, the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the Holy See. Focusing on such co‐operation in the Middle East we analyse the consequences and impacts in three dimensions: following Northern norms in aid practices; diversifying aid resources to involve business and non‐governmental sectors; and scaling up Taiwan–US regional and global relations. The article casts new light on the complex development geography beyond the conventional North–South axes. Policy implications The case of Taiwan illustrates the need to question the conventional division between the Global North and Global South. It is also time for the former to include Taiwan as a reliable partner and to use its example to encourage other politically isolated countries and regions to play more important roles as responsible global stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi‐Chen Wu & Shiuh‐Shen Chien, 2022. "Northernization for Breaking‐through International Isolation: Taiwan’s Trilateral Aid Cooperation in the Middle East Refugee Crisis and beyond," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:1:n:e12556
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagesh Kumar, 2008. "South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Asia-Pacific : Towards a New Paradigm in Development Cooperation," Development Economics Working Papers 22112, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Joel Atkinson, 2018. "The real East Asian Aid model: Development assistance as an instrument of comprehensive security in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(3), pages 265-284, May.
    3. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    4. Hernandez, Diego, 2017. "Are “New” Donors Challenging World Bank Conditionality?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 529-549.
    5. Peter Kragelund, 2008. "The Return of Non-DAC Donors to Africa: New Prospects for African Development?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(5), pages 555-584, September.
    6. World Bank, 2011. "Global Development Horizons 2011 : Multipolarity - The New Global Economy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2313, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelika J. Budjan & Andreas Fuchs, 2021. "Democracy and Aid Donorship," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 217-238, November.
    2. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    3. Katarzyna Andrzejczak & Agata Kliber, 2015. "The Model of French Development Assistance – Who Gets the Help?," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 89-109.
    4. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Gabriella Carolini & Daniel Gallagher & Isadora Cruxên, 2018. "The promise of proximity: The politics of knowledge and learning in South–South cooperation between water operators," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(7), pages 1157-1175, November.
    6. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    7. José Antonio Alonso & Guillermo Santander, 2022. "Triangular Cooperation: Change or Continuity?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 248-271, February.
    8. Jean Claude Berthélemy, 2011. "Working Paper 129 - China’s Engagement and Aid Effectiveness in Africa," Working Paper Series 295, African Development Bank.
    9. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2013. "Earth Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14673.
    10. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati & Yuanxin Li & Samuel Brazys & Alexander Dukalskis, 2019. "Building Bridges or Breaking Bonds? The Belt and Road Initiative and Foreign Aid Competition," Working Papers 201906, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    11. Mustafa Sakr & Andre Jordaan, 2016. "Emerging Multinational Corporations: A Prominent Player in the Global Economy," Working Papers 201623, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    12. Nagesh Kumar & Shuvojit Banerjee & Alberto Isgut & Daniel Jeongdae Lee, 2010. "Global Partnership for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth: An Agenda for the G20 Summits," MPDD Working Paper Series WP/10/12, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    13. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Go, Delfin S. & Maliszewska, Maryla & Osorio-Rodarte, Israel & Timmer, Hans, 2015. "Stress-testing Africa's recent growth and poverty performance," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 521-547.
    14. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2010. "Are 'new' donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between non-DAC and DAC donor," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 96, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    15. Aditya Alta & Rhapsagita Malist Pamasiwi, 2018. "Indonesian South-South Cooperation: Stepping Up the Institution and Strategy for Indonesias Development Assistance," LPEM FEBUI Working Papers 201817, LPEM, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, revised Jan 2018.
    16. Iulia Monica Oehler-Șincai, 2015. "BRICS’ contribution to the new world order: a capacity appraisal," National Strategies Observer (NOS), Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 2.
    17. Rory Horner, 2017. "What is global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 202017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    18. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2011. "Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1950-1968.
    19. Ann-Sofie Isaksson & Dick Durevall, 2023. "Aid and institutions: Local effects of World Bank aid on perceived institutional quality in Africa," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 523-551, July.
    20. Adrian Pop, 2014. "Rising through the Crisis: the Impact of Emerging Countries on the Future Distribution of Power," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 6(2), pages 26-29, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:1:n:e12556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.