IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/coecpo/v9y1991i1p73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nuclear Power, Systematic Risk, And The Cost Of Capital

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHEN FARBER

Abstract

Previous studies of the effects of adoption of nuclear technologies by electric utilities have concentrated on the period following the catastrophe at Three Mile Island (TMI) in 1979. The purpose of this study is to test whether increased risk effects on equity costs of nuclear‐adopting utilities existed prior to that event. This study, using panel data and beta measures of systematic risk, concludes that a positive, significant, and persistent nuclear adoption effect existed even prior to TMI. Nuclear adoption increased equity costs, on average, 0.8 percent for periods following the adoption event. This is of the same order of magnitude as adoption effects estimated in other studies for the post‐TMI period.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Farber, 1991. "Nuclear Power, Systematic Risk, And The Cost Of Capital," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 9(1), pages 73-82, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:9:y:1991:i:1:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1991.tb00319.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1991.tb00319.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1991.tb00319.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hill, Joanne & Schneeweis, Thomas, 1983. "The Effect of Three Mile Island on Electric Utility Stock Prices: A Note," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1285-1292, September.
    2. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    3. Bowen, Robert M. & Castanias, Richard P. & Daley, Lane A., 1983. "Intra-Industry Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 87-111, March.
    4. Norton, Seth W, 1985. "Regulation and Systematic Risk: The Case of Electric Utilities," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(3), pages 671-686, October.
    5. Paul Sommers, 1980. "The Adoption of Nuclear Power Generation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 11(1), pages 283-291, Spring.
    6. Clarke, Roger G, 1980. "The Effect of Fuel Adjustment Clauses on the Systematic Risk and Market Values of Electric Utilities," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(2), pages 347-358, May.
    7. Mandelker, Gershon N. & Rhee, S. Ghon, 1984. "The Impact of the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 45-57, March.
    8. Geoffrey S. Rothwell, 1989. "Stock Market Reaction To Nuclear Reactor Failures," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 7(3), pages 96-106, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garber, Steven & Hammitt, James K., 1998. "Risk Premiums for Environmental Liability: Does Superfund Increase the Cost of Capital?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 267-294, November.
    2. Allen, Pamela & McConnell, Kenneth E., 1991. "Explaining Risk in Asset Markets: A Varying Parameters Approach," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271159, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Ahmad, Ali & Ramana, M.V., 2014. "Too costly to matter: Economics of nuclear power for Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 682-694.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Veith, Stefan & Werner, Jörg R. & Zimmermann, Jochen, 2009. "Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 605-613, July.
    2. Nicolas, Maxime L.D. & Desroziers, Adrien & Caccioli, Fabio & Aste, Tomaso, 2024. "ESG reputation risk matters: An event study based on social media data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Andr� Betzer & Markus Doumet & Ulf Rinne, 2013. "How policy changes affect shareholder wealth: the case of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 799-803, May.
    4. Hafiz Muhammad Zia ul haq & Muhammad Sohail Shafiq & Muhammad Kashif & Saba Ameer, 2020. "Determining Force behind Value Premium: The Case of Financial Leverage and Operating Leverage," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Capelle-Blancard, Gunther & Laguna, Marie-Aude, 2010. "How does the stock market respond to chemical disasters?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 192-205, March.
    6. Alfredo Grau & Araceli Reig, 2021. "Operating leverage and profitability of SMEs: agri-food industry in Europe," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 221-242, June.
    7. Imlak Shaikh, 2019. "The U.S. Presidential Election 2012/2016 and Investors’ Sentiment: The Case of CBOE Market Volatility Index," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    8. Murod Aliyev & Timothy Devinney & Andrew Ferguson & Peter Lam, 2024. "Political discretion and risk: the Fukushima nuclear disaster, the distribution of global operations, and uranium company valuation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(3), pages 738-761.
    9. Ili, Dragan & Mollet, Janick Christian, 2015. "Voluntary Corporate Climate Initiatives and Regulatory Loom: Batten Down the Hatches," Working papers 2015/06, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    10. Hikmet Akyol & Selim Basar, 2024. "Empirical Analysis of Turkish Banking Sector Institutional and Macroeconomic Determinants of Risks," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 73(74-1), pages 59-98, June.
    11. Fdez-Galiano, Inés Merino & Feria-Dominguez, José Manuel, 2024. "Do ESG disclosures mitigate investors’ reaction on mining disasters? Evidence from Brazil," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 256-267.
    12. Wen-Jun Tu & Xiao-Guang Yue & Wei Liu & M. James C. Crabbe, 2020. "Valuation Impacts of Environmental Protection Taxes and Regulatory Costs in Heavy-Polluting Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Grossi, Luigi & Waterson, Michael, 2013. "German Energy Market Fallout from the Japanese Earthquake," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 157, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    14. Shaikh, Imlak, 2017. "The 2016 U.S. presidential election and the Stock, FX and VIX markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 546-563.
    15. Emeka T. Nwaeze, 2000. "Positive and Negative Earnings Surprises, Regulatory Climate, and Stock Returns," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 107-134, March.
    16. Karen L. Sedatole & Dimitris Vrettos & Sally K. Widener, 2012. "The Use of Management Control Mechanisms to Mitigate Moral Hazard in the Decision to Outsource," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 50(2), pages 553-592, May.
    17. Kalinowski Sławomir & Puziak Marcin, 2018. "Does a Financial Crisis Affect Operating Risk? Evidence from Polish Listed Companies," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 64-85, April.
    18. Lopatta, Kerstin & Kaspereit, Thomas, 2014. "The cross-section of returns, benchmark model parameters, and idiosyncratic volatility of nuclear energy firms after Fukushima Daiichi," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 125-136.
    19. Maxime L. D. Nicolas & Adrien Desroziers & Fabio Caccioli & Tomaso Aste, 2023. "ESG Reputation Risk Matters: An Event Study Based on Social Media Data," Papers 2307.11571, arXiv.org.
    20. Seyed Amir Hossein Sabet & Marie-Anne Cam & Richard Heaney, 2012. "Share market reaction to the BP oil spill and the US government moratorium on exploration," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(1), pages 61-76, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:9:y:1991:i:1:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.