IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i6p5886-5899.html

What gets measured well is managed well: Determining a hierarchy of interdependencies of environmental elements for effective environmental performance

Author

Listed:
  • Shiri Vivek
  • Sufian Qrunfleh
  • Vivek Dalela

Abstract

Climate effects of greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, energy use, and waste are a universal concern. With disparate reporting firms and a lack of universal measures of corporate sustainability, environmental sustainability for businesses is an afterthought, with minimal consequences for inaccurate reporting, or green washing and brown washing. This research explores four widely used reporting measures to first derive 12 universally applicable elements from five sustainability themes of emissions, land, water, energy, and waste. Using expert inputs and existing literature, the identified elements are subjected to interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to develop a framework of interdependencies among the elements and their influence on emissions. The framework identifies crucial elements, beyond carbon emissions, that have greater potential to reduce the climate impact of economic activity. Although aware of energy use implications, businesses have long ignored the indirect but catastrophic effects of non‐hazardous waste, the second level element, on climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiri Vivek & Sufian Qrunfleh & Vivek Dalela, 2024. "What gets measured well is managed well: Determining a hierarchy of interdependencies of environmental elements for effective environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5886-5899, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5886-5899
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3787
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. O'Shea & J. S. Golden & L. Olander, 2013. "Sustainability and Earth Resources: Life Cycle Assessment Modeling," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 429-441, November.
    2. Azevedo, Susana Garrido & Sequeira, Tiago & Santos, Marcelo & Mendes, Luis, 2019. "Biomass-related sustainability: A review of the literature and interpretive structural modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1107-1125.
    3. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Gallus, Philipp & Thomas, David, 2011. "Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 55230, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Chen Liping & Sun Yujun & Sajjad Saeed, 2018. "Monitoring and predicting land use and land cover changes using remote sensing and GIS techniques—A case study of a hilly area, Jiangle, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Luluk Widyawati, 2020. "A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 619-637, February.
    7. Magali Delmas & Vered Doctori Blass, 2010. "Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 245-260, May.
    8. Ebikapade Amasuomo & Jim Baird, 2016. "The Concept of Waste and Waste Management," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(4), pages 88-96, December.
    9. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    10. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2021. "Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1426-1445, September.
    11. Natalia Semenova & Lars Hassel, 2015. "On the Validity of Environmental Performance Metrics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 249-258, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rzeznik, Aleksandra & Weiss-Hanley, Kathleen, 2021. "The Salience of ESG Ratings for Stock Pricing: Evidence From (Potentially) Confused Investors," CEPR Discussion Papers 16334, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    2. Luluk Widyawati, 2021. "Measurement concerns and agreement of environmental social governance ratings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1589-1623, April.
    3. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Francesco Scarpa & Antonio Costantini & Aoife Claire Fitzpatrick, 2025. "Unveiling the consequences of ESG rating disagreement: an empirical analysis of the impact on the cost of equity capital," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 177-200, May.
    4. Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha & Erick Meira & Renato J. Orsato, 2021. "Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3821-3838, December.
    5. Sofia Brito-Ramos & Maria Céu Cortez & Florinda Silva, 2022. "Do sustainability signals diverge? An analysis of labeling schemes for socially responsible investments ," Working Papers hal-04064367, HAL.
    6. Alkan, Doga & Ayari, Rayan & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2026. "Green fees: Sustainability impacts on portfolio management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Olivier Boiral & David Talbot & Marie‐Christine Brotherton, 2020. "Measuring sustainability risks: A rational myth?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2557-2571, September.
    8. Hu, Yucen & Wang, Yuxin, 2026. "The impact of ESG rating divergence on supply chain resilience: The threshold effect of corporate information transparency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    10. Francesco Cesarone & Lorenzo Lampariello & Davide Merolla & Jacopo Maria Ricci & Simone Sagratella & Valerio Giuseppe Sasso, 2023. "A bilevel approach to ESG multi-portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Jan Svanberg & Tohid Ardeshiri & Isak Samsten & Peter Öhman & Presha E. Neidermeyer & Tarek Rana & Natalia Semenova & Mats Danielson, 2022. "Corporate governance performance ratings with machine learning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 50-68, January.
    12. Mohammed S. Y. Omran & Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Aladdin Dwekat, 2021. "The relationship between integrated reporting and corporate environmental performance: A green trial," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 427-445, January.
    13. Monica Billio & Michele Costola & Iva Hristova & Carmelo Latino & Loriana Pelizzon, 2024. "Sustainable Finance: A Journey Toward ESG and Climate Risk," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 18(1-2), pages 1-75, January.
    14. Simona Cosma & Paolo Cucurachi & Vincenzo Gentile & Giuseppe Rimo, 2024. "Sustainable finance disclosure regulation insights: Unveiling socially responsible funds performance during COVID‐19 pandemic and Russia–Ukraine war," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3242-3257, May.
    15. Mathias Payer & Martin Schüder & Tanja Gemünden & Henning Zülch, 2025. "Aligning ESG ratings with cultural values: a framework for the German-speaking region," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Caterina Lucarelli & Sabrina Severini, 2024. "Anatomy of the chimera: Environmental, Social, and Governance ratings beyond the myth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4198-4217, July.
    17. Yiwen Ma & Seoklin Yim & Linghao Zhang, 2026. "The cost of ESG rating disagreement: increased corporate tax avoidance in China," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(3), pages 870-901, June.
    18. Gladys Lee & Xinning Xiao, 2020. "Voluntary Engagement in Environmental Projects: Evidence from Environmental Violators," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 325-348, June.
    19. Alfonso Del Giudice & Silvia Rigamonti, 2020. "Does Audit Improve the Quality of ESG Scores? Evidence from Corporate Misconduct," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5886-5899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.