IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v78y2022i1p85-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assuming independence in spatial latent variable models: Consequences and implications of misspecification

Author

Listed:
  • Francis K.C. Hui
  • Nicole A. Hill
  • A.H. Welsh

Abstract

Multivariate spatial data, where multiple responses are simultaneously recorded across spatially indexed observational units, are routinely collected in a wide variety of disciplines. For example, the Southern Ocean Continuous Plankton Recorder survey collects records of zooplankton communities in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, with the aim of identifying and quantifying spatial patterns in biodiversity in response to environmental change. One increasingly popular method for modeling such data is spatial generalized linear latent variable models (GLLVMs), where the correlation across sites is captured by a spatial covariance function in the latent variables. However, little is known about the impact of misspecifying the latent variable correlation structure on inference of various parameters in such models. To address this gap in the literature, we investigate how misspecifying and assuming independence for the latent variables' correlation structure impacts estimation and inference in spatial GLLVMs. Through both theory and numerical studies, we show that performance of maximum likelihood estimation and inference on regression coefficients under misspecification depends on a combination of the response type, the magnitude of true regression coefficient, and the corresponding loadings, and, most importantly, whether the corresponding covariate is (also) spatially correlated. On the other hand, estimation and inference of truly nonzero loadings and prediction of latent variables is consistently not robust to misspecification of the latent variable correlation structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis K.C. Hui & Nicole A. Hill & A.H. Welsh, 2022. "Assuming independence in spatial latent variable models: Consequences and implications of misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 85-99, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:1:p:85-99
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenni Niku & Wesley Brooks & Riki Herliansyah & Francis K C Hui & Sara Taskinen & David I Warton, 2019. "Efficient estimation of generalized linear latent variable models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Zudi Lu & Dag Tjøstheim, 2014. "Nonparametric Estimation of Probability Density Functions for Irregularly Observed Spatial Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1546-1564, December.
    3. J. Zhu & J. C. Eickhoff & P. Yan, 2005. "Generalized Linear Latent Variable Models for Repeated Measures of Spatially Correlated Multivariate Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 674-683, September.
    4. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    5. Francis K. C. Hui & Emi Tanaka & David I. Warton, 2018. "Order selection and sparsity in latent variable models via the ordered factor LASSO," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1311-1319, December.
    6. Verbeke, Geert & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 1997. "The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 541-556, February.
    7. Lopes, Hedibert Freitas & Gamerman, Dani & Salazar, Esther, 2011. "Generalized spatial dynamic factor models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1319-1330, March.
    8. Irina Irincheeva & Eva Cantoni & Marc G. Genton, 2012. "Generalized Linear Latent Variable Models with Flexible Distribution of Latent Variables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 39(4), pages 663-680, December.
    9. Kurisu, Daisuke, 2019. "On nonparametric inference for spatial regression models under domain expanding and infill asymptotics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    11. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vock, David & Davidian, Marie & Tsiatis, Anastasios, 2014. "SNP_NLMM: A SAS Macro to Implement a Flexible Random Effects Density for Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 56(c02).
    2. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    3. Liang Li & Jun Shao & Mari Palta, 2005. "A Longitudinal Measurement Error Model with a Semicontinuous Covariate," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 824-830, September.
    4. Jenni Niku & Francis K. C. Hui & Sara Taskinen & David I. Warton, 2021. "Analyzing environmental‐trait interactions in ecological communities with fourth‐corner latent variable models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    5. Saskia Litière & Ariel Alonso & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Type I and Type II Error Under Random-Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1038-1044, December.
    6. Bart Spiessens & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & KyungMann Kim, 2002. "Group Sequential Methods for an Ordinal Logistic Random-Effects Model Under Misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 569-575, September.
    7. Wendimagegn Ghidey & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Paul Eilers, 2004. "Smooth Random Effects Distribution in a Linear Mixed Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 945-953, December.
    8. Richard M. Golden & Steven S. Henley & Halbert White & T. Michael Kashner, 2019. "Consequences of Model Misspecification for Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Missing Data," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Ting Fung Ma & Fangfang Wang & Jun Zhu, 2023. "On generalized latent factor modeling and inference for high‐dimensional binomial data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2311-2320, September.
    10. Andersson, Björn & Jin, Shaobo & Zhang, Maoxin, 2023. "Fast estimation of multiple group generalized linear latent variable models for categorical observed variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "Misspecification test for random effects in generalized linear finite-mixture models for clustered binary and ordered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 112-131.
    12. Lin, Kuo-Chin & Chen, Yi-Ju, 2015. "Detecting misspecification in the random-effects structure of cumulative logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 126-133.
    13. Das, Debojyoti & Bhatia, Vaneet & Kumar, Surya Bhushan & Basu, Sankarshan, 2022. "Do precious metals hedge crude oil volatility jumps?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. P.A.V.B. Swamy & I-Lok Chang & Jatinder S. Mehta & William H. Greene & Stephen G. Hall & George S. Tavlas, 2016. "Removing Specification Errors from the Usual Formulation of Binary Choice Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Carlo Altavilla & Raffaella Giacomini & Giuseppe Ragusa, 2017. "Anchoring the yield curve using survey expectations," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 1055-1068, September.
    16. Fernando Rios-Avila & Gustavo Canavire-Bacarreza, 2018. "Standard-error correction in two-stage optimization models: A quasi–maximum likelihood estimation approach," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 18(1), pages 206-222, March.
    17. Sandy Fréret & Denis Maguain, 2017. "The effects of agglomeration on tax competition: evidence from a two-regime spatial panel model on French data," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(6), pages 1100-1140, December.
    18. Ai, Chunrong & Chen, Xiaohong, 2007. "Estimation of possibly misspecified semiparametric conditional moment restriction models with different conditioning variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 5-43, November.
    19. Ayouz, Mourad K. & Remaud, Herve, 2003. "The Internationalization Determinants Of The Small Agro-Food Firms: Hypotheses And Statistical Tests," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27.
    20. Broze, Laurence & Gourieroux, Christian, 1998. "Pseudo-maximum likelihood method, adjusted pseudo-maximum likelihood method and covariance estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 75-98, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:1:p:85-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.