IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v55y2011i1p703-714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Xianzheng

Abstract

Mixed effects models provide a suitable framework for statistical inference in a wide range of applications. The validity of likelihood inference for this class of models usually depends on the assumptions on random effects. We develop diagnostic tools for detecting random-effects model misspecification in a rich class of mixed effects models. These methods are illustrated via simulation and application to soybean growth data.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:1:p:703-714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00257-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verbeke, Geert & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 1997. "The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 541-556, February.
    2. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    3. Agresti, Alan & Caffo, Brian & Ohman-Strickland, Pamela, 2004. "Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 639-653, October.
    4. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Hartford, Alan & Davidian, Marie, 2000. "Consequences of misspecifying assumptions in nonlinear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 139-164, August.
    6. Xianzheng Huang, 2009. "Diagnosis of Random-Effect Model Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Binary Response," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 361-368, June.
    7. Tze Leung Lai, 2003. "Nonparametric estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Christian Ritz, 2004. "Goodness‐of‐fit Tests for Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(3), pages 443-458, September.
    9. Saskia Litière & Ariel Alonso & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Type I and Type II Error Under Random-Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1038-1044, December.
    10. Paul Gustafson, 2001. "On measuring sensitivity to parametric model misspecification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 81-94.
    11. Rasmus Waagepetersen, 2006. "A Simulation‐based Goodness‐of‐fit Test for Random Effects in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(4), pages 721-731, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schützenmeister, André & Piepho, Hans-Peter, 2012. "Residual analysis of linear mixed models using a simulation approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1405-1416.
    2. Broström, Göran & Holmberg, Henrik, 2011. "Generalized linear models with clustered data: Fixed and random effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3123-3134, December.
    3. Yaakov Malinovsky & Paul S. Albert & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2012. "Pooling Designs for Outcomes under a Gaussian Random Effects Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 45-52, March.
    4. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    5. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2017. "Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 333-359, August.
    6. Kuo-Chin Lin & Yi-Ju Chen, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests of generalized linear mixed models for repeated ordinal responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2053-2064, August.
    7. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Kuo-Chin & Chen, Yi-Ju, 2015. "Detecting misspecification in the random-effects structure of cumulative logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 126-133.
    2. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2017. "Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(3), pages 333-359, August.
    3. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    4. Reza Drikvandi & Geert Verbeke & Geert Molenberghs, 2017. "Diagnosing misspecification of the random-effects distribution in mixed models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 63-71, March.
    5. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "Misspecification test for random effects in generalized linear finite-mixture models for clustered binary and ordered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 112-131.
    6. Alonso, A. & Litière, S. & Molenberghs, G., 2008. "A family of tests to detect misspecifications in the random-effects structure of generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4474-4486, May.
    7. Shun Yu & Xianzheng Huang, 2019. "Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 827-843, September.
    8. Saskia Litière & Ariel Alonso & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Type I and Type II Error Under Random-Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1038-1044, December.
    9. Freddy Hernández & Viviana Giampaoli, 2018. "The Impact of Misspecified Random Effect Distribution in a Weibull Regression Mixed Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    11. Bart Spiessens & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & KyungMann Kim, 2002. "Group Sequential Methods for an Ordinal Logistic Random-Effects Model Under Misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 569-575, September.
    12. Vock, David & Davidian, Marie & Tsiatis, Anastasios, 2014. "SNP_NLMM: A SAS Macro to Implement a Flexible Random Effects Density for Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 56(c02).
    13. Baghishani, Hossein & Mohammadzadeh, Mohsen, 2012. "Asymptotic normality of posterior distributions for generalized linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 66-77.
    14. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1989. "Testing for Consistency using Artificial Regressions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 363-384, December.
    15. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    16. White, Halbert & Hong, Yongmiao, 1999. "M-Testing Using Finite and Infinite Dimensional Parameter Estimators," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt9qz123ng, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    17. Malmendier, Ulrike M. & Botsch, Matthew J., 2020. "The Long Shadows of the Great Inflation: Evidence from Residential Mortgages," CEPR Discussion Papers 14934, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    19. E Fe-Rodriguez & C D Orme, 2005. "The Asymptotic Equivalence of Kernel-based Nonparametric Conditional Moment Test Statistics," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0504, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    20. Gabriele Fiorentini & Enrique Sentana, 2021. "Specification tests for non‐Gaussian maximum likelihood estimators," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 683-742, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:55:y:2011:i:1:p:703-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.