IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i4p1171-1179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Antonelli
  • Matthew Cefalu
  • Nathan Palmer
  • Denis Agniel

Abstract

Valid estimation of treatment effects from observational data requires proper control of confounding. If the number of covariates is large relative to the number of observations, then controlling for all available covariates is infeasible. In cases where a sparsity condition holds, variable selection or penalization can reduce the dimension of the covariate space in a manner that allows for valid estimation of treatment effects. In this article, we propose matching on both the estimated propensity score and the estimated prognostic scores when the number of covariates is large relative to the number of observations. We derive asymptotic results for the matching estimator and show that it is doubly robust in the sense that only one of the two score models need be correct to obtain a consistent estimator. We show via simulation its effectiveness in controlling for confounding and highlight its potential to address nonlinear confounding. Finally, we apply the proposed procedure to analyze the effect of gender on prescription opioid use using insurance claims data.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Antonelli & Matthew Cefalu & Nathan Palmer & Denis Agniel, 2018. "Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1171-1179, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:4:p:1171-1179
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12887
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. D. James Greiner & Donald B. Rubin, 2011. "Causal Effects of Perceived Immutable Characteristics," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(3), pages 775-785, August.
    3. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2011. "Inference on Treatment Effects After Selection Amongst High-Dimensional Controls," Papers 1201.0224, arXiv.org, revised May 2012.
    4. Chi Wang & Francesca Dominici & Giovanni Parmigiani & Corwin Matthew Zigler, 2015. "Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 654-665, September.
    5. van der Laan Mark J. & Gruber Susan, 2010. "Collaborative Double Robust Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-71, May.
    6. Chi Wang & Giovanni Parmigiani & Francesca Dominici, 2012. "Bayesian Effect Estimation Accounting for Adjustment Uncertainty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 661-671, September.
    7. Tyler J. VanderWeele & Ilya Shpitser, 2011. "A New Criterion for Confounder Selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1406-1413, December.
    8. Chi Wang & Giovanni Parmigiani & Francesca Dominici, 2012. "Rejoinder: Bayesian Effect Estimation Accounting for Adjustment Uncertainty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 680-686, September.
    9. Farrell, Max H., 2015. "Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-23.
    10. Nelson, David & Noorbaloochi, Siamak, 2013. "Information preserving sufficient summaries for dimension reduction," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 347-358.
    11. Ghosh, Debashis, 2011. "Propensity score modelling in observational studies using dimension reduction methods," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 813-820, July.
    12. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    13. Xavier De Luna & Ingeborg Waernbaum & Thomas S. Richardson, 2011. "Covariate selection for the nonparametric estimation of an average treatment effect," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 861-875.
    14. Ander Wilson & Brian J. Reich, 2014. "Confounder selection via penalized credible regions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 852-861, December.
    15. Ben B. Hansen, 2008. "The prognostic analogue of the propensity score," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(2), pages 481-488.
    16. Heejung Bang & James M. Robins, 2005. "Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 962-973, December.
    17. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2013. "Supplementary Appendix for "Inference on Treatment Effects After Selection Amongst High-Dimensional Controls"," Papers 1305.6099, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    18. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    19. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    20. Alberto Abadie & Guido W. Imbens, 2006. "Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 235-267, January.
    21. Corwin Matthew Zigler & Francesca Dominici, 2014. "Uncertainty in Propensity Score Estimation: Bayesian Methods for Variable Selection and Model-Averaged Causal Effects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 95-107, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu Yang & Yunshu Zhang, 2023. "Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(1), pages 235-265, March.
    2. Goller, Daniel & Lechner, Michael & Moczall, Andreas & Wolff, Joachim, 2020. "Does the estimation of the propensity score by machine learning improve matching estimation? The case of Germany's programmes for long term unemployed," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Seonho Shin, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of the Matching Grant Program for Refugees: An Observational Study Using Matching, Weighting, and the Mantel-Haenszel Test," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 103-133, March.
    4. Joseph Antonelli & Georgia Papadogeorgou & Francesca Dominici, 2022. "Causal inference in high dimensions: A marriage between Bayesian modeling and good frequentist properties," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 100-114, March.
    5. Agboola, Oluwagbenga David & Yu, Han, 2023. "Neighborhood-based cross fitting approach to treatment effects with high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    6. Heejun Shin & Joseph Antonelli, 2023. "Improved inference for doubly robust estimators of heterogeneous treatment effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3140-3152, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agboola, Oluwagbenga David & Yu, Han, 2023. "Neighborhood-based cross fitting approach to treatment effects with high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Susan M. Shortreed & Ashkan Ertefaie, 2017. "Outcome‐adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1111-1122, December.
    3. Matthew Cefalu & Francesca Dominici & Nils Arvold & Giovanni Parmigiani, 2017. "Model averaged double robust estimation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 410-421, June.
    4. David Cheng & Abhishek Chakrabortty & Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan & Tianxi Cai, 2020. "Estimating average treatment effects with a double‐index propensity score," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 767-777, September.
    5. Ertefaie Ashkan & Asgharian Masoud & Stephens David A., 2018. "Variable Selection in Causal Inference using a Simultaneous Penalization Method," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Ander Wilson & Brian J. Reich, 2014. "Confounder selection via penalized credible regions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 852-861, December.
    7. Antonelli Joseph & Cefalu Matthew, 2020. "Averaging causal estimators in high dimensions," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 92-107, January.
    8. Tingting Zhou & Michael R. Elliott & Roderick J. A. Little, 2021. "Robust Causal Estimation from Observational Studies Using Penalized Spline of Propensity Score for Treatment Comparison," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Xun Lu, 2015. "A Covariate Selection Criterion for Estimation of Treatment Effects," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 506-522, October.
    10. Ian W. McKeague & Min Qian, 2015. "An Adaptive Resampling Test for Detecting the Presence of Significant Predictors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1422-1433, December.
    11. Dingke Tang & Dehan Kong & Wenliang Pan & Linbo Wang, 2023. "Ultra‐high dimensional variable selection for doubly robust causal inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 903-914, June.
    12. Chanmin Kim & Mauricio Tec & Corwin Zigler, 2023. "Bayesian nonparametric adjustment of confounding," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3252-3265, December.
    13. Chen, Ya & Tsionas, Mike G. & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2021. "LASSO+DEA for small and big wide data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. D’Amour, Alexander & Ding, Peng & Feller, Avi & Lei, Lihua & Sekhon, Jasjeet, 2021. "Overlap in observational studies with high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 644-654.
    15. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "High Dimensional Time Series Regression Models: Applications to Statistical Learning Methods," Papers 2308.16192, arXiv.org.
    16. Ander Wilson & Corwin M. Zigler & Chirag J. Patel & Francesca Dominici, 2018. "Model‐averaged confounder adjustment for estimating multivariate exposure effects with linear regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1034-1044, September.
    17. Brandon Koch & David M. Vock & Julian Wolfson, 2018. "Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 8-17, March.
    18. Persson, Emma & Häggström, Jenny & Waernbaum, Ingeborg & de Luna, Xavier, 2017. "Data-driven algorithms for dimension reduction in causal inference," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 280-292.
    19. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    20. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:4:p:1171-1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.