IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v73y2017i4p1413-1423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint modeling of zero‐inflated panel count and severity outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • E. Juarez‐Colunga
  • G. L. Silva
  • C. B. Dean

Abstract

Panel counts are often encountered in longitudinal, such as diary, studies where individuals are followed over time and the number of events occurring in time intervals, or panels, is recorded. This article develops methods for situations where, in addition to the counts of events, a mark, denoting a measure of severity of the events, is recorded. In many situations there is an association between the panel counts and their marks. This is the case for our motivating application that studies the effect of two hormone therapy treatments in reducing counts and severities of vasomotor symptoms in women after hysterectomy/ovariectomy. We model the event counts and their severities jointly through the use of shared random effects. We also compare, through simulation, the power of testing for the treatment effect based on such joint modeling and an alternative scoring approach, which is commonly employed. The scoring approach analyzes the compound outcome of counts times weighted severity. We discuss this approach and quantify challenges which may arise in isolating the treatment effect when such a scoring approach is used. We also show that the power of detecting a treatment effect is higher when using the joint model than analysis using the scoring approach. Inference is performed via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Juarez‐Colunga & G. L. Silva & C. B. Dean, 2017. "Joint modeling of zero‐inflated panel count and severity outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1413-1423, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:4:p:1413-1423
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12691
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin French & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2009. "Marginal Mark Regression Analysis of Recurrent Marked Point Process Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 415-422, June.
    2. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    3. D. B. Dunson, 2000. "Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(2), pages 355-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dexen DZ. Xi & C.B. Dean & Stephen W. Taylor, 2020. "Modeling the duration and size of extended attack wildfires as dependent outcomes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    2. Assaf, A. George & Tsionas, Mike & Oh, Haemoon, 2018. "The time has come: Toward Bayesian SEM estimation in tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-109.
    3. Dingjing Shi & Xin Tong, 2017. "The Impact of Prior Information on Bayesian Latent Basis Growth Model Estimation," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    4. Lu, Zhenqiu (Laura) & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2014. "Robust growth mixture models with non-ignorable missingness: Models, estimation, selection, and application," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 220-240.
    5. Li, Yun-Xian & Kano, Yutaka & Pan, Jun-Hao & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2012. "A criterion-based model comparison statistic for structural equation models with heterogeneous data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 92-107.
    6. Xin-Yuan Song & Zhao-Hua Lu & Jing-Heng Cai & Edward Ip, 2013. "A Bayesian Modeling Approach for Generalized Semiparametric Structural Equation Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 624-647, October.
    7. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    8. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    9. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    11. Francois Olivier & Laval Guillaume, 2011. "Deviance Information Criteria for Model Selection in Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Raggi, Davide & Bordignon, Silvano, 2012. "Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3730-3742.
    13. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    14. Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2023. "Large Time‐Varying Volatility Models for Hourly Electricity Prices," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(3), pages 545-573, June.
    15. Rubio, F.J. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Inference for grouped data with a truncated skew-Laplace distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3218-3231, December.
    16. Alessandri, Piergiorgio & Mumtaz, Haroon, 2019. "Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 31-46.
    17. Padilla, Juan L. & Azevedo, Caio L.N. & Lachos, Victor H., 2018. "Multidimensional multiple group IRT models with skew normal latent trait distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 250-268.
    18. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    19. David Macro & Jeroen Weesie, 2016. "Inequalities between Others Do Matter: Evidence from Multiplayer Dictator Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Tautenhahn, Susanne & Heilmeier, Hermann & Jung, Martin & Kahl, Anja & Kattge, Jens & Moffat, Antje & Wirth, Christian, 2012. "Beyond distance-invariant survival in inverse recruitment modeling: A case study in Siberian Pinus sylvestris forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 90-103.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:4:p:1413-1423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.