IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaec/v38y2024i1p35-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did economic cooperation encourage trade in essential medical goods? Empirical evidence from the Asia–Pacific during COVID‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Sen
  • Sanchita Basu Das

Abstract

Our paper empirically investigates the role of economic cooperation involving trade in coronavirus disease (COVID‐19)‐related essential medical goods—vaccines and their value chains, personal protective equipment, and diagnostic test kits—across 29 Asia and the Pacific economies. The paper incorporates vaccines and their global value chain products trade for the first time in the empirical literature. We further investigate whether trade facilitation, proxied by membership in regional trade agreements (RTAs), can help mitigate any adverse impact on trade in essential medical goods, applying a structural gravity framework. The results confirm that while trade is critical for Asian economies, its nature differs. Low‐income economies are largely dependent on imports, whereas selected middle‐ and high‐income economies are part of two‐way trade and engaged in the low end of the vaccine value chain. We find that the onset of the pandemic has hurt exports of these goods. This adverse effect is found to be lowered for economies engaged in RTAs. This emphasizes the role of governments in committing to RTAs and implementing trade facilitation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Sen & Sanchita Basu Das, 2024. "Did economic cooperation encourage trade in essential medical goods? Empirical evidence from the Asia–Pacific during COVID‐19," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 35-60, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaec:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:35-60
    DOI: 10.1111/asej.12317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12317
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/asej.12317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaec:v:38:y:2024:i:1:p:35-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.