IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v85y2026i1p25-32.html

Overall Group and Elite Core Contributions to Scientific Worth: Ranking Economics Departments in the U.S. South

Author

Listed:
  • Franklin G. Mixon
  • Kamal P. Upadhyaya

Abstract

Dating back to at least 1975, several academic studies have produced a ranking of economics departments (faculties) in the U.S. South. In revisiting this genre of the literature, this study builds upon prior work by (1) including all of the U.S. News & World Report‐classified national universities and colleges located in the U.S. South, which is a list that has grown considerably in recent years, and (2) examining citations to economists' prior work rather than publications and page counts, which have been used by most prior studies. Following rational choice research on reputation and group identity, this study employs a quality metric that accounts for the efforts of all a department's faculty. Based on research from organizational behavior emphasizing the importance of top performers in an organization, this study also employs a separate quality metric that accounts for the efforts of an elite core of a department's faculty. Using the former metric, the University of Maryland prevails. When relying on the latter metric, Duke University earns the top‐ranked position.

Suggested Citation

  • Franklin G. Mixon & Kamal P. Upadhyaya, 2026. "Overall Group and Elite Core Contributions to Scientific Worth: Ranking Economics Departments in the U.S. South," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 25-32, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:25-32
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12644
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:25-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.