IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v9y1993i4p279-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the sustainability and economic viability of tropical farming systems: a model from sub‐Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Simeon K. Ehui
  • Dunstan S.C. Spencer

Abstract

New technologies must be developed in sub‐Saharan Africa which are sustainable and economically viable. This paper discusses a methodology for measuring the agricultural sustainability and economic viability of tropical farming systems for new technology evaluation. The approach is based on the concept of interspatial and intertemporal total factor productivity, paying particular attention to valuation of natural resource stock and flows. Agriculture is a sector which utilizes natural resources (e.g. soil nutrients) and the stock and flows of these resources affect the production environment. However, in many cases, the stock of these resources is beyond the control of the farmer and must be accounted for in an agricultural sustainability and economic viability measurement. For example, soil nutrients are removed by crops, erosion or leaching beyond the crop root‐zone, or other processes such as volatilization of nitrogen. Agricultural production can also contribute to the stock of some nutrients by leguminous plants such as agroforestry systems. Using a data set available at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, we compute the intertemporal and interspatial total factor productivity indices for four cropping systems in southwestern Nigeria using stock of major soil nutrients as the natural resource stock. Results show that the sustainability and economic viability measures are sensitive to changes in the stock and flow of soil nutrients as well as the material inputs and outputs. Where the contribution of natural resource stock and flows are important (such as in the case of alley cropping), the measures provide markedly different results from conventional TFP approaches. The advantage of this approach is that interspatial and intertemporal total factor productivity measures are computed using only price and quantity data, thus eliminating the need for econometric estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Simeon K. Ehui & Dunstan S.C. Spencer, 1993. "Measuring the sustainability and economic viability of tropical farming systems: a model from sub‐Saharan Africa," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(4), pages 279-296, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:9:y:1993:i:4:p:279-296
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00275.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00275.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00275.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barmon, Basanta Kumar & Osanami, Fumio & Kondo, Takumi, 2006. "Economic Evaluation of Rice-Prawn Gher Farming System on Soil Fertility for Modern Variety (MV) Paddy Production in Bangladesh," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25355, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Daniel Gaitán-Cremaschi & Frits K. Van Evert & Don M. Jansen & Miranda P. M. Meuwissen & Alfons G. J. M. Oude Lansink, 2018. "Assessing the Sustainability Performance of Coffee Farms in Vietnam: A Social Profit Inefficiency Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Ehui, Simeon K. & Jabbar, Mohammad A., 2002. "Measuring productivity in African agriculture: a survey of applications," Research Reports 182883, International Livestock Research Institute.
    4. Ali, Mubarik & Byerlee, Derek, 2000. "Productivity growth and resource degradation in Pakistan's Punjab - a decomposition analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2480, The World Bank.
    5. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Gavian, Sarah & Ehui, Simeon, 1999. "Measuring the production efficiency of alternative land tenure contracts in a mixed crop-livestock system in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 37-49, January.
    7. Ali, Mubarik, 1996. "Quantifying the socio-economic determinants of sustainable crop production: an application to wheat cultivation in the Tarai of Nepal," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 45-60, April.
    8. IFEGWU, Kalu Ukpai, 2016. "Assessing Agricultural Production Systems From A Sustainability Perspective: Some Findings From Agro-Ecological Zones Of Africa," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 19(2), pages 1-7, October.
    9. Ehui, Simeon K. & Jabbar, Mohammad A., 1997. "A framework for evaluating the sustainability and economic viability of crop livestock systems in sub Saharan Africa," Research Reports 182902, International Livestock Research Institute.
    10. Simpson, Jeffrey Randal & Okalebo, John Robert & Lubulwa, Godfrey, 1996. "The Problem of Maintaining Soil Fertility in Eastern Kenya: A Review of Relevant Research," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 117193.
    11. Baidu-Forson, J. & Renard, C., 1996. "Comparing productivity of millet-based cropping systems in unstable environments of the Sahel: possibilities and challenges," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 85-95.
    12. Byerlee, Derek & Murgai, Rinku, 2001. "Sense and sustainability revisited: the limits of total factor productivity measures of sustainable agricultural systems," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 227-236, December.
    13. Kumar, Praduman & Mittal, Surabhi, 2006. "Agricultural Productivity Trends in India: Sustainability Issues," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(Conferenc).
    14. Schuhbauer, Anna & Sumaila, U. Rashid, 2016. "Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 69-75.
    15. Ndip, Francis Ebai & Molua, Ernest L. & Mvodo, Meyo-Elise Stephanie & Nkendah, Robert & Djomo Choumbou, Raoul Fani & Tabetando, Rayner & Akem, Nina Fabinin, 2023. "Farmland Fragmentation, crop diversification and incomes in Cameroon, a Congo Basin country," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:9:y:1993:i:4:p:279-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.