IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v64y2024i5p4789-4824.html

The mediating role of ESG: Managers' moral cognition can improve corporate performance

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Gao
  • Xin Lyu

Abstract

This study explores the influence mechanism among managers' moral cognition (MC), environmental, social and governance (ESG) and financial performance. Based on the sample of A‐shares listed companies in China from 2010 to 2021, the text mining method was used to construct the indicators of MC so as to conduct empirical tests. The results show that MC is positively correlated with financial performance, and ESG plays a mediating role in this relationship. The heterogeneity test demonstrates that the positive effect of MC on financial performance is most obvious in the heavily polluting companies, while it is weak in the companies with high asset turnover.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Gao & Xin Lyu, 2024. "The mediating role of ESG: Managers' moral cognition can improve corporate performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(5), pages 4789-4824, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:64:y:2024:i:5:p:4789-4824
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13350
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Tripsas & Giovanni Gavetti, 2000. "Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1147-1161, October.
    2. Paul C. Tetlock & Maytal Saar‐Tsechansky & Sofus Macskassy, 2008. "More Than Words: Quantifying Language to Measure Firms' Fundamentals," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1437-1467, June.
    3. Kai Li & Feng Mai & Rui Shen & Xinyan Yan, 2021. "Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning [Machine learning methods that economists should know about]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(7), pages 3265-3315.
    4. Cyril Bouquet & Allen Morrison & Julian Birkinshaw, 2009. "International attention and multinational enterprise performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(1), pages 108-131, January.
    5. Oe, Akitsu & Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi, 2013. "Founders' experiences for startups' fast break-even," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2193-2201.
    6. Theresa S. Cho & Donald C. Hambrick, 2006. "Attention as the Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change: The Case of Airline Deregulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 453-469, August.
    7. Carter, Craig R. & Jennings, Marianne M., 2002. "Social responsibility and supply chain relationships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 37-52, January.
    8. Praveen Kumar & Nisan Langberg, 2009. "Corporate fraud and investment distortions in efficient capital markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(1), pages 144-172, March.
    9. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    10. Kai Li & Feng Mai & Rui Shen & Xinyan Yan, 2021. "Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data: Long-Term Implications for Financial Markets and Firms, pages 3265-3315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. David Gadenne & Jessica Kennedy & Catherine McKeiver, 2009. "An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 45-63, January.
    12. Joëlle Vanhamme & Adam Lindgreen & Jon Reast & Nathalie Popering, 2012. "To Do Well by Doing Good: Improving Corporate Image Through Cause-Related Marketing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 259-274, September.
    13. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2003. "Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and The Private Provision of Public Goods," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 419-445, September.
    14. Rong Liu & Feng He & Jianyu Ren, 2021. "Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Enterprise Environmental Performance on Economic Performance: Evidence from China’s Large Iron and Steel Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Sarah Kaplan & Fiona Murray & Rebecca Henderson, 2003. "Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(2), pages 203-233, April.
    16. Kylie C. Rochford & Anthony I. Jack & Richard E. Boyatzis & Shannon E. French, 2017. "Ethical Leadership as a Balance Between Opposing Neural Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 755-770, September.
    17. Michael J. Fern & Laura B. Cardinal & Hugh M. O'Neill, 2012. "The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 427-447, April.
    18. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Supply Chain Consequences of Subsidies for Corporate Social Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1346-1357, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rekha Pillai & Muhammad Sani Khamisu & Ratna Achuta Paluri, 2026. "Rationales behind managerial integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) in corporate framework in emerging markets," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengler, Matthias R. & Phan, Tri Minh, 2025. "Unveiling themes in 10-K disclosures: A new topic modeling perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Fengler, Matthias & Phan, Minh Tri, 2023. "A Topic Model for 10-K Management Disclosures," Economics Working Paper Series 2307, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    3. Wang, Sumingyue & Wang, Xinlu & Xu, Liang, 2023. "Debt maturity structure and the quality of risk disclosures," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Koichi Nakagawa & Yoichi Matsumoto, 2015. "Issue selection flexibility and strategic rigidity: Lessons from Sharp's crisis," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-24, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    5. Alex Kim & Maximilian Muhn & Valeri Nikolaev, 2023. "Bloated Disclosures: Can ChatGPT Help Investors Process Information?," Papers 2306.10224, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    6. Philip Mundlos, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on managerial attention allocation for discontinuous change: a conceptual framework," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1-45, June.
    7. Fang, Yiwei & Fiordelisi, Franco & Hasan, Iftekhar & Leung, Woon Sau & Wong, Gabriel, 2023. "Corporate culture and firm value: Evidence from crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Dang, Man & Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Jones, Edward & Bui, Nguyen & Le, Thuy Dung, 2024. "Does corporate culture shape “Tone at the Top”? Evidence from earnings calls," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. John Eklund & Manav Raj & J. P. Eggers, 2025. "Attention Focus and New Opportunities: The Moderating Role of Managerial Attention to Alternative Issues," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 21-39, January.
    10. Liang, Qing & Li, Zhaohua, 2024. "Litigation risk and the cost of debt financing in M&As," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    11. Wang, Xunxiao & Li, Luxi & Bian, Shibo, 2024. "Irrelevant answers in customers’ earnings communication conferences and suppliers’ cash holdings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. van den Oever, Koen, 2017. "Uncharted waters : A behavioral approach to when, why and which organizational changes are adopted," Other publications TiSEM 0136c8c2-ecdd-4f82-8ca7-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Kaplan, Sarah & Tripsas, Mary, 2008. "Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 790-805, June.
    14. J. P. Eggers & Sarah Kaplan, 2009. "Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 461-477, April.
    15. Yao Ge & Zheng Qiao & Zhe Shen & Zhiyu Zhang, 2023. "Production similarity and the cross‐section of stock returns: A machine learning approach," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 4849-4882, December.
    16. Donal Crilly & Pamela Sloan, 2014. "Autonomy or Control? Organizational Architecture and Corporate Attention to Stakeholders," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 339-355, April.
    17. Yusuke Matsumoto & Aiko Suge & Hiroshi Takahashi, 2025. "Analysis of the relationship between technological diversification and enterprise value using patent data," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 247-270, June.
    18. Aktas, Nihat & de Bodt, Eric & Dogan, Can Deniz, 2025. "Do investor reactions to merger announcements shape the writing of SEC filings?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    19. Giuseppe Matera, 2025. "Corporate Earnings Calls and Analyst Beliefs," Papers 2511.15214, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    20. Zijia Du & Alan Guoming Huang & Russ Wermers & Wenfeng Wu, 2022. "Language and Domain Specificity: A Chinese Financial Sentiment Dictionary [The effects of analyst-country institutions on biased research: Evidence from target prices]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(3), pages 673-719.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:64:y:2024:i:5:p:4789-4824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.