IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v61y2025i3p711-752.html

Intra‐industry Performance Ranking and Relative Performance Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohua (Stephen) Wu

Abstract

This study examines the association between firms’ intra‐industry performance ranking and the use of relative performance evaluation (RPE) in executive compensation plans. It finds an inverted U‐shape association between firms’ intra‐industry performance ranking and the use of RPE (i.e., compared to bottom‐ and top‐ranked firms, middle‐ranked firms are more likely to use RPE). This effect could be explained by the availability of similar peers in RPE incentive contracting: I find that both bottom‐ and top‐ranked firms have fewer similar peers, limiting their opportunities to efficiently practise RPE compared to middle‐ranked firms. Finally, the inverted U‐shape association is more pronounced for firms with higher potential costs induced by heterogeneous peers and for RPE that uses self‐selected peer groups. Overall, this study provides new evidence of the determinants of RPE use and suggests that the incentivization effect of RPE compensation plans varies with firms’ intra‐industry performance ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohua (Stephen) Wu, 2025. "Intra‐industry Performance Ranking and Relative Performance Evaluation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 61(3), pages 711-752, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:3:p:711-752
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12361
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Do, Truc & Zhang, Huai & Zuo, Luo, 2022. "Rocking the boat: How relative performance evaluation affects corporate risk taking," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1).
    2. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Mani, Sureshbabu & Ye, Pengfei, 2016. "Relative peer quality and firm performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 196-219.
    3. Albuquerque, Ana, 2009. "Peer firms in relative performance evaluation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 69-89, October.
    4. Stuart L. Gillan & Jay C. Hartzell & Robert Parrino, 2009. "Explicit versus Implicit Contracts: Evidence from CEO Employment Agreements," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1629-1655, August.
    5. Francis, Bill & Hasan, Iftekhar & Mani, Sureshbabu & Ye, Pengfei, 2016. "Relative peer quality and firm performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 196-219.
    6. Wruck, Karen H. & Wu, YiLin, 2022. "Relative Versus Absolute Performance Evaluation and CEO Decision-Making," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(7), pages 2591-2626, November.
    7. Gibbons, Robert & Murphy, Kevin J, 1992. "Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(3), pages 468-505, June.
    8. Schmalensee, Richard, 1988. "Industrial Economics: An Overview," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(392), pages 643-681, September.
    9. De Angelis, David & Grinstein, Yaniv, 2020. "Relative Performance Evaluation in CEO Compensation: A Talent-Retention Explanation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(7), pages 2099-2123, November.
    10. O'Keeffe, Mary & Viscusi, W Kip & Zeckhauser, Richard J, 1984. "Economic Contests: Comparative Reward Schemes," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 27-56, January.
    11. Tor‐Erik Bakke & Hamed Mahmudi & Ashley Newton, 2020. "Performance peer groups in CEO compensation contracts," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 997-1027, December.
    12. John Bizjak & Swaminathan Kalpathy & Zhichuan Frank Li & Brian Young, 2022. "The Choice of Peers for Relative Performance Evaluation in Executive Compensation [Peer choice in CEO compensation]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1217-1239.
    13. Robert Gibbons & Kevin J. Murphy, 1990. "Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 43(3), pages 30, April.
    14. Custódio, Cláudia & Ferreira, Miguel A. & Matos, Pedro, 2013. "Generalists versus specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 471-492.
    15. Carolyn Deller & Tatiana Sandino, 2020. "Effects of a Tournament Incentive Plan Incorporating Managerial Discretion in a Geographically Dispersed Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 911-931, February.
    16. Kai Li & Feng Mai & Rui Shen & Xinyan Yan, 2021. "Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data: Long-Term Implications for Financial Markets and Firms, pages 3265-3315, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2010. "Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(10), pages 3773-3811, October.
    18. Jared Jennings & Hojun Seo & Mark T. Soliman, 2020. "The market’s reaction to changes in relative performance rankings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 672-725, June.
    19. Gerald J. Lobo & Michael Neel & Adrienne Rhodes, 2018. "Accounting comparability and relative performance evaluation in CEO compensation," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1137-1176, September.
    20. Kai Li & Feng Mai & Rui Shen & Xinyan Yan, 2021. "Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning [Machine learning methods that economists should know about]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(7), pages 3265-3315.
    21. Radhakrishnan Gopalan & Todd Milbourn & Fenghua Song, 2010. "Strategic Flexibility and the Optimality of Pay for Sector Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 2060-2098.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, YiLin & Ieong, Richard Lok-Si & Thomas, Shawn, 2025. "Exposures to common shocks along supply chains and relative performance evaluation in CEO compensation contracts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Na, Ke, 2020. "CEOs’ outside opportunities and relative performance evaluation: evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 679-700.
    3. Do, Truc & Zhang, Huai & Zuo, Luo, 2022. "Rocking the boat: How relative performance evaluation affects corporate risk taking," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1).
    4. Frances M. Tice, 2024. "The Role of Common Risk in the Effectiveness of Explicit Relative Performance Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1635-1655, March.
    5. Raphael Flepp & Pascal Flurin Meier, 2024. "Struck by Luck: Noisy Capability Cues and CEO Dismissal," Working Papers 389, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    6. Lin, Yu-En & Xu, Yu-Xin & Yu, Bo & Lam, Keith S.K., 2025. "The impact of outcome uncertainty on corporate investment compensation peer effects," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Christoph Feichter & Frank Moers & Oscar Timmermans, 2022. "Relative Performance Evaluation and Competitive Aggressiveness," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(5), pages 1859-1913, December.
    8. Werner Bönte & Dmitrii Galkin, 2025. "Relative Performance Evaluation and Executive Compensation: Adding Fuel to the Fire," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 4070-4087, October.
    9. Timmermans, Oscar, 2024. "Cash versus share payouts in relative performance plans," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123696, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Fee, C. Edward & Hadlock, Charles J. & Pierce, Joshua R., 2018. "New evidence on managerial labor markets: An analysis of CEO retreads," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 428-441.
    11. Miguel Antón & Florian Ederer & Mireia Giné & Martin Schmalz, 2023. "Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(5), pages 1294-1355.
    12. Alex Edmans & Xavier Gabaix, 2016. "Executive Compensation: A Modern Primer," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1232-1287, December.
    13. Yao Du & Iftekhar Hasan & Chih-Yung Lin & Chien-Lin Lu, 2025. "CEO personality traits and compensation: evidence from investment efficiency," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 1595-1641, November.
    14. Schneider, Thomas, 2025. "Executive incentives under common ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Lin William Cong & Tengyuan Liang & Xiao Zhang & Wu Zhu, 2025. "Textual Factors: A Scalable, Interpretable, and Data-Driven Approach to Analyzing Unstructured Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10727-10739, December.
    16. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. An, Suwei, 2023. "Essays on incentive contracts, M&As, and firm risk," Other publications TiSEM dd97d2f5-1c9d-47c5-ba62-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Choi, Yoon K. & Han, Seung Hun & Kwon, Yonghyun, 2024. "Relative performance evaluation with business group affiliation as a source of common risk," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Du, Kunhai & Zhao, Qicheng & Yin, Yugang & Zhang, Tiancheng, 2024. "Marketing executives and corporate performance: From the perspective of marketing digitalization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 631-644.
    20. John (Jianqiu) Bai & Wang Jin & Matthew Serfling, 2022. "Management Practices and Mergers and Acquisitions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2141-2165, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:3:p:711-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.