IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v16y2025i1p60-79n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Empathetic Company Philosophy and Advanced Technologies in Shaping Job Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Koizumi Masaki

    (Future Value Co-creation Division, NEC Corporation, Japan)

  • Kato Takumi

    (School of Commerce, Meiji University, Japan)

Abstract

Background Although the literature has assessed various factors underlying employee attitudes, knowledge of company philosophy and advanced technology is lacking, especially in the context of the major drivers of job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Objectives This study clarified the differences in the factors contributing to job satisfaction and turnover intentions, focusing on 10 factors—eight from the literature (rewarding work, skill acquisition, fair wages, work–life balance, flexible work, office equipment, relationships with superiors, and corporate social responsibility) and two new factors: company philosophy and advanced technology. Methods Following a literature review and hypotheses development, we applied structural equation modeling to data collected using an online survey of 1,000 workers employed in 10 industries (automobiles, banking, clothing, cosmetics, electronics, food, government, IT, medical and health care, and retail) in Japan. Results An empathic company philosophy increases job satisfaction, and this effect is more prominent among women than among men. This study concretely demonstrated that company philosophy is an important tool for motivating employees within an organization toward a common goal. Additionally, it showed that the introduction of advanced technology increases turnover intentions regardless of gender. Conclusions Analyzing the factors behind employee attitudes, such as the introduction of advanced technology, may improve job satisfaction and decrease turnover intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Koizumi Masaki & Kato Takumi, 2025. "The Role of Empathetic Company Philosophy and Advanced Technologies in Shaping Job Attitudes," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 60-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:60-79:n:1004
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2025-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2025-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2025-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald F. Davis, 2021. "Corporate Purpose Needs Democracy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 902-913, May.
    2. Chandan A. Chavadi & Monika Sirothiya & Vishwanatha M R, 2022. "Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intentions and Job Mismatch Among Millennial Employees in Bengaluru," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(1), pages 79-100, January.
    3. Debelak, Katja & Grah, Barbara & Penger, Sandra, 2023. "Ageing Workforce's Impact on Modern Organizations: How to Extend Working Lives?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2023), Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Hybrid Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 4-6 September, 2023, pages 166-180, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    4. Belén Derqui, 2020. "Towards sustainable development: Evolution of corporate sustainability in multinational firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2712-2723, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthijs Bal & Andy Brookes, 2022. "How Sustainable Is Human Resource Management Really? An Argument for Radical Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Meenakshi Sharma & Rajesh Kaushal & Prashant Kaushik & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2021. "Carbon Farming: Prospects and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Emilie Bourlier-Bargues & Jean-Pascal Gond & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Fast and spurious: How executives capture governance structures to prevent cooperativization," Post-Print hal-03828145, HAL.
    4. Vítor Silva & Vanda Lima & José Carlos Sá & Luís Fonseca & Gilberto Santos, 2022. "B Impact Assessment as a Sustainable Tool: Analysis of the Certification Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Małgorzata Sławińska, 2022. "Integrated Approach for Safety Culture Factor Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Diego Arias & Xabier Barriola & Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2024. "Corporate purpose and early disaster response: Providing evidence of dynamic materiality?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4598-4612, July.
    7. Muhammad Khan & Dimitrios Papadas & Lydia Arnold & Karl Behrendt, 2024. "Sustainability challenges in the multi-tier crop agri-food sector: a systematic review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-37, December.
    8. del Río, Cristina & López-Arceiz, Francisco J. & Muga, Luis, 2023. "Do sustainability disclosure mechanisms reduce market myopia? Evidence from European sustainability companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Barbosa, Anrafel de Souza & Crispim, Maria Cristina & da Silva, Luiz Bueno & da Silva, Jonhatan Magno Norte & Barbosa, Aglaucibelly Maciel & Correia, Lucas Miguel Alencar de Morais & Morioka, Sandra N, 2025. "Empirical analysis of workers' perceptions of ESG impacts on corporate sustainability performance: A methodological innovation combining the PLS-SEM, PROMETHEE-ROC and FIMIX-PLS methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Gregor Bouville & Jocelyne Barreau, 2021. "Les utopies du travail et le management : du 19e au 21e siècles," Post-Print halshs-03403834, HAL.
    11. Anselm Schneider & John Murray, 2025. "Escaping the Loop of Unsustainability: Why and How Business Ethics Matters for Earth System Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 21-29, January.
    12. Celik, Aylin & Kalka, Regine, "undated". "Die Abgrenzung, Eingliederung und Umsetzung des Corporate Purpose im Marketing [The Delimitation, Integration and Implementation of the Corporate Purpose in Marketing]," Duesseldorf Working Papers in Applied Management and Economics 58, Duesseldorf University of Applied Sciences.
    13. Zhidi Pan & Yan Wang & Zhijun Liu, 2025. "Over-Education, Job Satisfaction, and Intention to Quit: Evidence from China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 287-307, January.
    14. Emilie Bourlier-Bargues & Bertrand Valiorgue & Nicolas Spatola, 2024. "Relever les défis de la transition climatique : l'enjeu des biais cognitifs dans les prises de décision des conseils d'administration," Post-Print hal-04580484, HAL.
    15. Veera Suchitra & Bietsch Samantha & Jones Susan & Ward Paul, 2024. "Systematic Literature Review of Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance Linkages," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 91(1), pages 115-142.
    16. Donald F. Kuratko & David B. Audretsch, 2022. "The future of entrepreneurship: the few or the many?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 269-278, June.
    17. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:60-79:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.