IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v16y2025i1p285-304n1014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions: A Bibliometric Analysis and a Review of Methodological Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Srok Antonija

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Bonča Petra Došenović

    (School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background Digital health interventions (DHI) have been identified as a tool that has the potential to meet the growing demand for healthcare, improve the efficiency and sustainability of healthcare, and increase the accessibility and quality of care. The adoption and use of DHI for healthcare was strongly encouraged during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in a sharp increase in the number of DHI-related publications. Objectives The number of DHI’s economic evaluations (EE) is significantly smaller, accounting for less than 5% of publications on DHI. However, they are essential for demonstrating DHI’s cost-effectiveness relative to comparable healthcare interventions. Methods/Approach We conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications on EE of DHI extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection. Results We analyse 2,308 publications from 2005 to 2023 and present the most influential countries, organisations, journals, and publications along with the corresponding bibliometric networks to explore the existing literature on EE of DHI. Furthermore, we systematise concerns and methodological challenges surrounding the economic justification of DHI. Conclusions This paper aims to build a knowledge base for future research to improve EE of DHI, given that only strong clinical and economic evidence can adequately inform resource allocation decisions and thereby encourage adoption of DHI.

Suggested Citation

  • Srok Antonija & Bonča Petra Došenović, 2025. "Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions: A Bibliometric Analysis and a Review of Methodological Challenges," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 285-304.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:285-304:n:1014
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2025-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2025-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2025-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Drummond, Michael F. & Sculpher, Mark J. & Torrance, George W. & O'Brien, Bernie J. & Stoddart, Greg L., 2005. "Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780198529453, Decembrie.
    3. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    4. Manuel Gomes & Elizabeth Murray & James Raftery, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 367-378, April.
    5. Simon B Goldberg & Sin U Lam & Otto Simonsson & John Torous & Shufang Sun, 2022. "Mobile phone-based interventions for mental health: A systematic meta-review of 14 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Katarzyna Kolasa & Grzegorz Kozinski, 2020. "How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    8. Matias Busso & Maria P. Gonzalez & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "On the demand for telemedicine: Evidence from the COVID‐19 pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1491-1505, July.
    9. Eric Kaun Santos Silva & June Alisson Westarb Cruz & Maria Alexandra Viegas Cortez Cunha & Thyago Proença Moraes & Sandro Marques & Eduardo Damião Silva, 2021. "Cost-effectiveness in health: consolidated research and contemporary challenges," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Kai Huter & Tobias Krick & Heinz Rothgang, 2022. "Health economic evaluation of digital nursing technologies: a review of methodological recommendations," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. repec:plo:pmed00:1000387 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gour Gobinda Goswami & Tahmid Labib, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Charlie Karlsson & Björn Hammarfelt, 2025. "Correction: The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-1, June.
    3. Jin Su & Mo Wang & Mohd Adib Mohammad Razi & Norlida Mohd Dom & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Lai-Wai Tan, 2023. "A Bibliometric Review of Nature-Based Solutions on Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Khan, Ashraf & Goodell, John W. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2022. "A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    5. Hussain, Walayat & Merigó, José M. & Rahimi, Iman & Lev, Benjamin, 2025. "Half a century of Omega – The International Journal of Management Science: A bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Carè, Rosella & Fatima, Rabia & Agnese, Paolo, 2025. "Crowdfunding and sustainable development: A systematic review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    10. Cosma, Simona & Cosma, Stefano & Pennetta, Daniela & Rimo, Giuseppe, 2025. "Overcoming the “valleys of death” in advanced therapies: The role of finance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    11. Mbarki, Imen & Khan, Muhammad Arif & Karim, Sitara & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Lucey, Brian M., 2023. "Unveiling commodities-financial markets intersections from a bibliometric perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    12. Darko B. Vuković & Senanu Dekpo-Adza & Stefana Matović, 2025. "AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Daeyun Kang & Doojin Ryu & Robert I. Webb, 2025. "Bitcoin as a financial asset: a survey," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Faisal Bin Sulaiman, 2023. "Compact City: What Is the Extent of Our Exploration for Its Meanings? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Kaustov Chakraborty & Arindam Ghosh & Saurabh Pratap, 2023. "Adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain operations: a comprehensive literature study analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1989-2007, December.
    17. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Bhaskar, Ratikant & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2023. "Artificial intelligence, machine learning and big data in natural resources management: A comprehensive bibliometric review of literature spanning 1975–2022," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    19. Muhammad Khalid Shahid & Aye Aye Khin & Lim Chee Seong & Muhammad Shahbaz & Fiaz Ahmad, 2024. "Mapping the Relationship of Research and Development Expenditures and Economic Growth through Bibliometric Analysis: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17529-17555, December.
    20. Vilker Zucolotto Pessin & Luciana Harue Yamane & Renato Ribeiro Siman, 2022. "Smart bibliometrics: an integrated method of science mapping and bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3695-3718, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:285-304:n:1014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.