IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfr/bullbf/202223904.html

The remarkable resilience of Hong Kong’s exchange rate regime
[La singulière résilience du régime de change de Hong Kong]

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Cabrillac
  • Camille Macaire
  • Marie-Elisabeth De la Serve

Abstract

In 1983, Hong Kong pegged its currency to the US dollar. Since then, the special administrative region (SAR) has undergone profound transformations, changing from an industrial economy cut off from its Chinese hinterland to a key gateway for goods and capital between China and the rest of the world, and then to a centre for high value-added services, without abandoning the peg. The latter has also withstood various episodes of tension (Asian and 2008 financial crises, 2019 Protests, Covid). The history and functioning of this linked exchange rate regime sheds light on the factors of its resilience, as well as on the challenges that lie ahead. Hong Kong remains a key link in China’s international financial integration, which should lead to maintaining the peg. Hong Kong a adopté en 1983 un régime de change fixe dur (le « peg ») ancré au dollar américain. Depuis, la région administrative spéciale a connu des transformations profondes, passant d’une économie industrielle coupée de son hinterland chinois à un point de passage incontournable pour les biens et les capitaux entre la Chine et le reste du monde, puis à un centre de services à forte valeur ajoutée, sans renoncer au peg. Ce dernier a également résisté à différents épisodes de tensions (crises financières asiatique et de 2008, manifestations de 2019, Covid). L’histoire et le fonctionnement de ce régime de change éclairent sur les facteurs de sa résilience, ainsi que sur les enjeux à venir. Hong Kong reste un maillon clé pour l’intégration financière internationale de la Chine, ce qui devrait entraîner le maintien du peg.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Cabrillac & Camille Macaire & Marie-Elisabeth De la Serve, 2022. "The remarkable resilience of Hong Kong’s exchange rate regime [La singulière résilience du régime de change de Hong Kong]," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 239.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfr:bullbf:2022:239:04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/821421_bdf239-4_en_peg_hong_kong_vfinale.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/bdf239-4_peg_hk_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Williamson, 1995. "What Role of Currency Boards?," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number pa40, October.
    2. Lillian Cheung & Eric Wong & Philip Ng & Ken Wong, 2018. "Assessing the impact of globalisation: Lessons from Hong Kong," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Globalisation and deglobalisation, volume 100, pages 139-147, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Goodhart, Charles & Dai, Lu, 2003. "Intervention to Save Hong Kong: The Authorities' Counter-Speculation in Financial Markets," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199261109.
    4. Hong Kong Monetary Authority, 2013. "Monetary operations under the Currency Board system: the experience of Hong Kong," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Sovereign risk: a world without risk-free assets?, volume 73, pages 145-154, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Ramkishen S. Rajan & Reza Siregar, 2002. "Choice of Exchange Rate Regime: Currency Board (Hong Kong) or Monitoring Band (Singapore)?," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 538-556, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi-Chi Chen, 2013. "The Dynamics of Interbank Rate Behavior Under Alternative Monetary Regimes: The Case of Hong Kong," China Economic Policy Review (CEPR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 1-21.
    2. Kai Tim Wong, Douglas & Wong, Anson, 2021. "Do the uncertainty-induced capital outflows matter in currency crisis? Evidence from the Hong Kong speculative attacks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    3. Duo Qin & Xinhua He & Yimeng Liu, 2010. "Exchange Rate Misalignments: Historical Experience of Japan, Germany, Singapore and Taiwan Compared to China Today," Working Papers 667, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Mardi Dungey & Rene Fry & Vance L. Martin, 2006. "Correlation, Contagion, and Asian Evidence," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 5(2), pages 32-72, Spring/Su.
    5. Raoul Lättemäe, 2001. "Monetary transmission mechanism in Estonia - some theorethical considerations and stylized aspects," Bank of Estonia Working Papers 2001-4, Bank of Estonia, revised 13 Oct 2001.
    6. repec:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:71-84 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Dorota Zuchowska, 2015. "Accession To The Eurozone As Lithuania’S Exit Strategy From The Currency Board System," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(3), pages 27-43, September.
    8. Neven Valev, 2000. "Building Monetary Credibility in a Transforming Economy," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0212, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    9. Pastor Jr., Manuel & Wise, Carol, 1999. "Stabilization and its Discontents: Argentina's Economic Restructuring in the 1990s," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 477-503, March.
    10. Peter Wilson, 2005. "Prospects for Asian Exchange Rate Cooperation: Why an ERM Solution Might be the Most Palatable," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34.
    11. Guergana Stanoeva, 2004. "Les caisses d’émission des Pays Baltes et de la Bulgarie : la recherche d’une crédibilité renforcée," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 75(2), pages 85-112.
    12. Tse, Y.K. & Yip, Paul S.L., 2006. "Exchange-rate systems and interest-rate behaviour: The experience of Hong Kong and Singapore," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 212-227.
    13. Richard W. Kopcke, 1999. "Currency boards: once and future monetary regimes?," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue May, pages 21-37.
    14. Tony Addison & Alemayehu Geda & Philippe Le Billon & S Mansoob Murshed, 2005. "Reconstructing and Reforming the Financial System in Conflict and 'Post-Conflict' Economies," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 703-718.
    15. Zihui Ma & Leonard K. Cheng, 2014. "An Optimal Currency Basket to Minimize Output and Inflation Volatility: Theory and an Application to Hong Kong," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 90-111, February.
    16. Krainer, Robert E., 2014. "Monetary policy and bank lending in the Euro area: Is there a stock market channel or an interest rate channel?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(PB), pages 283-298.
    17. Pieter van Foreest & Casper de Vries, 2003. "The Forex Regime and EMU Expansion," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 285-298, July.
    18. Yum K. Kwan & Francis T. Lui & Leonard K. Cheng, 2001. "Credibility of Hong Kong's Currency Board: The Role of Institutional Arrangements," NBER Chapters, in: Regional and Global Capital Flows: Macroeconomic Causes and Consequences, pages 233-259, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Bullmann, Dirk & Klemm, Jonas & Pinna, Andrea, 2019. "In search for stability in crypto-assets: are stablecoins the solution?," Occasional Paper Series 230, European Central Bank.
    20. Bennett T. McCallum, 2007. "Monetary Policy in East Asia: The Case of Singapore," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 25(S1), pages 13-28, December.
    21. Jeffrey Frankel & Sergio Schmukler & Luis Serven, 2000. "Verifiability and the Vanishing Intermediate Exchange Rate Regime," NBER Working Papers 7901, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:bullbf:2022:239:04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael brassart (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdfgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.