IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjppa/v4y2019i1p58-71id910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special Court For Sierra Leone: The Mandate And The Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Bolaji Alabi
  • Yinka Olomojobi PhD
  • Olajumoke Yacob -Haliso PhD

Abstract

Purpose: The Special Court for Sierra Leone was set up in 2002 as a transitional justice mechanism after the country's ten year civil war. The court concluded its sitting in 2013. The study explored the nexus between expectations of the people and the actual mandate of the court in respect of compensation and also ascertained the appropriateness of the court as a transitional justice mechanism. Methodology: The study adopted multi stage sampling technique in selecting the four towns in Sierra Leone which were studied. The major instrument of data collection was validated questionnaire supplemented by a semi structure interview guide. Findings: The study found that though the court had no mandate to compensate victims, 63% of the respondents expected that the court would give monetary compensation to the victims while 60% felt that the victims should have been compensated. The study concluded that there was a divergence between the expectations of people and the actual mandate of the Special Court though the court was the appropriate mechanism at the time for transitional justice in Sierra Leone. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy:The study recommended that future criminal tribunals employed as transitional justice mechanisms should be empowered to compensate victims and also such tribunals should be ad hoc and sit in the country of conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolaji Alabi & Yinka Olomojobi PhD & Olajumoke Yacob -Haliso PhD, 2019. "Special Court For Sierra Leone: The Mandate And The Challenges," Journal of Public Policy and Administration, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 58-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjppa:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:58-71:id:910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPPA/article/view/910
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjppa:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:58-71:id:910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPPA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.