IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p1351-1364.html

Technological Capability and Sustainability Performance of Medium and Large Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi County the Mediating Role of Innovativeness

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Chepkemboi Limo

    (Department of Management Science and Entrepreneurship School of Business and Economics, Moi University, Kenya)

  • Ronald Bonuke

    (Department of Management Science and Entrepreneurship School of Business and Economics, Moi University, Kenya)

  • Lydia Maket

    (Department of Management Science and Entrepreneurship School of Business and Economics, Moi University, Kenya)

Abstract

This paper empirically examines the influence of technological capability on the sustainability performance of medium and large manufacturing firms in Nairobi County, Kenya, and assesses the mediating role of innovation in this relationship. The study used a sample of 302 manufacturing firms and employed Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 4) to test the direct and indirect effects among the variables. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relationships, and bootstrapping with 5,000 samples was used to confirm the significance of the indirect effect. The results revealed that technological capability has a significant and positive direct effect on sustainability performance. Innovation was also found to positively influence sustainability performance and significantly mediate the relationship between technological capability and sustainability performance. Additionally, technological capability significantly predicted innovation. These findings suggest that firms with higher technological capabilities are more likely to achieve superior sustainability outcomes when such capabilities are deployed through innovative practices. The study provides valuable insights for managers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders in the manufacturing sector. Firms should prioritize investments in technological infrastructure and innovation capacity to enhance sustainable performance. Policymakers may consider developing incentives and policies that support technology adoption and innovation in manufacturing, particularly in Nairobi County. This study contributes to the literature by empirically validating the mediating role of innovation in the relationship between technological capability and sustainability performance in the context of medium and large manufacturing firms in Nairobi County. It highlights the importance of leveraging internal capabilities to drive innovation and sustainability outcomes in industrial enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Chepkemboi Limo & Ronald Bonuke & Lydia Maket, 2025. "Technological Capability and Sustainability Performance of Medium and Large Manufacturing Firms in Nairobi County the Mediating Role of Innovativeness," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 1351-1364, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:1351-1364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/1351-1364.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/technological-capability-and-sustainability-performance-of-medium-and-large-manufacturing-firms-in-nairobi-county-the-mediating-role-of-innovativeness/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 531-543, September.
    2. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    3. Thorsten Beck & Asli Demirguc-Kunt & Ross Levine, 2005. "SMEs, Growth, and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 199-229, September.
    4. Zoltan J. Acs & David B. Audretsch, 1989. "Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 171-180, August.
    5. Pelin Demirel & Effie Kesidou, 2019. "Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 847-857, July.
    6. Michele Acciaro & Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Claudio Ferrari & Athena Roumboutsos & Genevieve Giuliano & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Seraphim Kapros, 2014. "Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 480-500, September.
    7. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Li & Thillai Raja Pertheban & Qiaoling Li & Zheng Guang-Wen, 2025. "The Green Innovation Gateway: How Technological Capabilities and Environmental Strategies Drive Sustainability Performance in Manufacturing Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
    2. Caroline Gauthier & Corine Genet, 2014. "Nanotechnologies and Green Knowledge Creation: Paradox or Enhancer of Sustainable Solutions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 571-583, November.
    3. Alpana Taneja & Vinay Goyal & Kunjana Malik, 2023. "Sustainability‐oriented innovations – Enhancing factors and consequences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2747-2765, November.
    4. Larissa Marchiori Pacheco & Marlon Fernandes Rodrigues Alves & Lara Bartocci Liboni, 2018. "Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1502-1513, December.
    5. Lu Qiu & Die Hu & Yu Wang, 2020. "How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2695-2714, September.
    6. Annette Brunsmeier & Markus Groth, 2015. "Hidden climate change related risks for the private sector," Working Paper Series in Economics 333, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    7. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert & Sudawan Somjai & Sriparinya Toopgajank, 2020. "Factors Affecting Firm s Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting, Green Innovation and Environmental Proactivity," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 325-331.
    8. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Sistya Rachmawati, 2023. "The New Model: Green Innovation Modified to Moderate the Influence of Integrated Reporting, Green Intellectual Capital toward Green Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 61-67, March.
    10. Gema Albort-Morant & Jörg Henseler & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2017. "Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Mert Gürlek & Muharrem Tuna, 2018. "Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7-8), pages 467-491, June.
    12. Chan, Hing Kai & Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Dai, Jing & Lim, Ming K., 2016. "The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 384-391.
    13. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    14. Endah Rahayu Lestari & Nimas Mayang Sabrina Sunyoto, 2023. "Fostering green innovation in achieving sustainable performance," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 413-434, August.
    15. Stanley Kam Sing Wong, 2013. "Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 321-338, July.
    16. Desalegn A. Gugissa & Paul T.M. Ingenbleek & Hans C.M. van Trijp & Mebrahtu L. Teklehaimanot & Workneh K. Tessema, 2021. "When natural resources run out, market knowledge steps in: Lessons on natural resource deployment from a longitudinal study in a resource‐scarce region of Ethiopia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1598-1609, May.
    17. Tuan-Hock Ng & Chun-Teck Lye & Kar-Hoong Chan & Ying-Zhee Lim & Ying-San Lim, 2020. "Sustainability in Asia: The Roles of Financial Development in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 17-44, July.
    18. Ben Arfi, Wissal & Hikkerova, Lubica & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2018. "External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 210-220.
    19. Liang Li & Hajar Msaad & Huaping Sun & Mei Xuen Tan & Yeqing Lu & Antonio K.W. Lau, 2020. "Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: New Evidence from Energy Intensive Industry in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2023. "Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Qualitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:1351-1364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.