IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-5p5434-5452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triangulating A Mixed-Method Approach to Design Sustainable a Solar Energy Decision-Making Framework: A Malaysian Residential Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Haziq Mohammed

    (Arshad Ayub Business School, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Malaysia)

  • Mior Harris Mior Harun

    (Arshad Ayub Business School, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Malaysia)

  • Peck Leong Tan

    (Arshad Ayub Business School, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Malaysia)

Abstract

Despite Malaysia’s high solar potential and the availability of government incentives under programs like Net Energy Metering (NEM 3.0), the adoption of solar energy systems (SES) among household consumers remains significantly low. This study aims to develop a sustainable decision-making framework by triangulating qualitative insights and quantitative prioritization to better understand the key factors influencing SES adoption. A sequential mixed-method design was employed in two phases. In Phase One, thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with SES adopters under NEM 3.0 revealed six major themes: financial viability, service capability, technology flexibility, company credibility, regulatory feasibility, and external influences. Phase Two applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to these six themes, using pairwise comparisons conducted by SES users to quantify the relative importance of each criterion. The AHP findings revealed that Service Capability (26.07%) and Financial Viability (24.79%) were the most influential factors, while External Influences received the lowest weight. These quantitative results were found to be consistent with the qualitative insights from Phase One, indicating strong convergence between what users expressed narratively and how they prioritized factors when forced to make trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Haziq Mohammed & Mior Harris Mior Harun & Peck Leong Tan, 2025. "Triangulating A Mixed-Method Approach to Design Sustainable a Solar Energy Decision-Making Framework: A Malaysian Residential Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 5434-5452, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:5434-5452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-5/5434-5452.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/triangulating-a-mixed-method-approach-to-design-sustainable-a-solar-energy-decision-making-framework-a-malaysian-residential-perspective/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat, 2014. "Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 458-466.
    2. Balcombe, Paul & Rigby, Dan & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 403-418.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    2. Tang, Shengwen & Chen, Jingtao & Sun, Peigui & Li, Yang & Yu, Peng & Chen, E., 2019. "Current and future hydropower development in Southeast Asia countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Myanmar)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 239-249.
    3. Andrew Chapman & Timothy Fraser & Melanie Dennis, 2019. "Investigating Ties between Energy Policy and Social Equity Research: A Citation Network Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Palm, A., 2020. "Early adopters and their motives: Differences between earlier and later adopters of residential solar photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    6. Poier, Stefan, 2023. "A matter of risk? Investigating the battery purchase decision in the German photovoltaics market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Alipour, Mohammad & Taghikhah, Firouzeh & Irannezhad, Elnaz & Stewart, Rodney A. & Sahin, Oz, 2022. "How the decision to accept or reject PV affects the behaviour of residential battery system adopters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    8. Najafi, Fatemeh & Kazemi, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Mishra, Phoolenrda, 2025. "Prioritizing industrial wastes and technologies for bioenergy production: Case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Mohamed Ali Elleuch & Marwa Mallek & Ahmed Frikha & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid & Murad Andejany, 2021. "Solving a Multiple User Energy Source Selection Problem Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    11. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2023. "Renewable Energy Supply Chains—Text Mining and Co-Occurrence Analysis in the Context of the Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Palm, Alvar & Lantz, Björn, 2020. "Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: The effect of an information campaign in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Khalifa Mohammed Al-Sobai & Shaligram Pokharel & Galal M. Abdella, 2020. "Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    14. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hackbarth, André & Löbbe, Sabine, 2020. "Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Ozcan, Mustafa, 2014. "Assessment of renewable energy incentive system from investors' perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 425-432.
    17. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    18. Jayaraj, Nikhil & Klarin, Anton & Ananthram, Subramaniam, 2024. "The transition towards solar energy storage: a multi-level perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Sara Ghaboulian Zare & Reza Hafezi & Mohammad Alipour & Reza Parsaei Tabar & Rodney A. Stewart, 2021. "Residential Solar Water Heater Adoption Behaviour: A Review of Economic and Technical Predictors and Their Correlation with the Adoption Decision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    21. Haddad, Brahim & Liazid, Abdelkrim & Ferreira, Paula, 2017. "A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 462-472.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:5434-5452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.