IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-45896-5905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Women in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Jane Francis

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Finance & Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Hui Li You

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Finance & Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Shyue Chuan Chong

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Finance & Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

  • Chia Yien Lim

    (Faculty of Accountancy, Finance & Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Women’s entrepreneurship has gained recognition as a crucial catalyst for economic development, social advancement, and job creation, particularly in emerging economies such as Malaysia. Despite concerted efforts by Malaysia to promote gender parity, significant disparities remain in female entrepreneurial participation. This shift also aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 5, which advocates for women’s economic empowerment and involvement in leadership positions. This paper presents a conceptual framework that investigates the theoretical analysis of the elements that impact women’s intention to start their businesses, particularly in Malaysia. This conceptual framework integrates the Push-Pull-Mooring (PPM) Migration Model with the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to provide a comprehensive understanding of their intention and address the existing literature gap. Although the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been extensively utilised to predict entrepreneurial intentions through attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, it has been limited in capturing contextual and structural barriers faced by women in the literature. Nevertheless, it does not adequately explore its impact on push and pull variables, particularly the mediating role of mooring factors on women’s entrepreneurial intentions. To bridge this gap, the PPM model introduces socio-cultural (push) and opportunity-driven (pull) factors influencing women’s decisions to pursue entrepreneurship. The proposed framework fills a critical gap in the existing literature by offering a multidimensional understanding of the drivers of female entrepreneurial intention, addressing internal motivations and external influences on women’s entrepreneurial behaviour. It also offers practical insights for policymakers to develop targeted strategies that remove barriers and enhance support entrepreneurial ecosystems benefiting aspiring women in Malaysia. Ultimately, the paper aims to contribute to Malaysia’s progress toward SDG 5 by promoting inclusive economic participation and creating a supportive environment for women’s entrepreneurial growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Jane Francis & Hui Li You & Shyue Chuan Chong & Chia Yien Lim, 2025. "Improving the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Women in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 5896-5905, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:5896-5905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/5896-5905.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/improving-the-entrepreneurial-intentions-of-women-in-malaysia-a-conceptual-framework/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Guido Salazar-Sepulveda & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Intention: A Gender Study in Business and Economics Students from Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Irene Kamberidou, 2020. "“Distinguished” women entrepreneurs in the digital economy and the multitasking whirlpool," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Sonja Franzke & Jie Wu & Fabian Jintae Froese & Zi Xuan Chan, 2022. "Female entrepreneurship in Asia: a critical review and future directions," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 343-372, July.
    4. Leon Schjoedt & Kelly G. Shaver, 2007. "Deciding on an Entrepreneurial Career: A Test of the Pull and Push Hypotheses Using the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Data1," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(5), pages 733-752, September.
    5. Houda Bouarir & Asmae Diani & Omar Boubker & Jaouad Rharzouz, 2023. "Key Determinants of Women’s Entrepreneurial Intention and Behavior: The Role of Business Opportunity Recognition and Need for Achievement," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Muhammad Zubair Alam & Shazia Kousar & Ch. Abdul Rehman, 2019. "Role of entrepreneurial motivation on entrepreneurial intentions and behaviour: theory of planned behaviour extension on engineering students in Pakistan," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Rizwan Ullah Khan & Yashar Salamzadeh & Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Mazhar Hussain, 2021. "Factors affecting women entrepreneurs’ success: a study of small- and medium-sized enterprises in emerging market of Pakistan," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Emiel L. Eijdenberg & Enno Masurel, 2013. "ENTREPRENEURIAL MOTIVATION IN A LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRY: PUSH FACTORS AND PULL FACTORS AMONG MSEsIN UGANDA," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 19-43.
    9. Obinna C. Ojiaku & Anayo D. Nkamnebe & Ireneus C. Nwaizugbo, 2018. "Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions among young graduates: perspectives of push-pull-mooring model," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Fu, Jen-Ruei, 2011. "Understanding career commitment of IT professionals: Perspectives of push–pull–mooring framework and investment model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 279-293.
    11. Friederike Welter, 2011. "Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 165-184, January.
    12. Peter Zwan & Roy Thurik & Ingrid Verheul & Jolanda Hessels, 2016. "Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 273-295, December.
    13. M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee, 2018. "Work-Life Balance: an Integrative Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 229-254, March.
    14. Pushkar Dubey & Kailash Kumar Sahu, 2022. "Examining the effects of demographic, social and environmental factors on entrepreneurial intention," Management Matters, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 91-108, May.
    15. Olivier Giacomin & Frank Janssen & Jean-Luc Guyot & Olivier Lohest, 2023. "Opportunity and/or Necessity Entrepreneurship? The Impact of the Socio-Economic Characteristics of Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Anisya S Thomas & Stephen L Mueller, 2000. "A Case for Comparative Entrepreneurship: Assessing the Relevance of Culture," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 31(2), pages 287-301, June.
    17. Rey-Martí, Andrea & Tur Porcar, Ana & Mas-Tur, Alicia, 2015. "Linking female entrepreneurs' motivation to business survival," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 810-814.
    18. Jabir Ali & Sana Shabir & Ateeque Shaikh, 2021. "Exploring antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among females in an emerging economy," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 48(7), pages 1044-1059, April.
    19. Peter Zwan & Roy Thurik & Ingrid Verheul & Jolanda Hessels, 2016. "Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 273-295, December.
    20. Raghu Raman & Nava Subramaniam & Vinith Kumar Nair & Avinash Shivdas & Krishnashree Achuthan & Prema Nedungadi, 2022. "Women Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development: Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-31, July.
    21. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research," Post-Print hal-02546796, HAL.
    22. Dean A. Shepherd & Dawn R. DeTienne, 2005. "Prior Knowledge, Potential Financial Reward, and Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(1), pages 91-112, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Wei & Orbes, Irina & Ma, Pengcheng, 2024. "Necessity- and opportunity-based female entrepreneurship across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    2. Marco Caliendo & Alexander S. Kritikos & Claudia Stier, 2023. "The influence of start-up motivation on entrepreneurial performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 869-889, October.
    3. Maksim Belitski & Christina Guenther & Alexander S. Kritikos & Roy Thurik, 2022. "Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 593-609, February.
    4. José Ernesto Amorós & Marcelo Leporati & Alfonso Jesús Torres-Marín & Sergio Roses, 2024. "Opportunity entrepreneurship after 65: Relevant factors in OECD countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 1215-1244, June.
    5. Cervelló-Royo, R. & Moya-Clemente, I. & Perelló-Marín, M.R. & Ribes-Giner, G., 2020. "Sustainable development, economic and financial factors, that influence the opportunity-driven entrepreneurship. An fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 393-402.
    6. Ratan J. S. Dheer & Len J. Treviño, 2022. "Explaining the rate of opportunity compared to necessity entrepreneurship in a cross-cultural context: Analysis and policy implications," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 29-55, March.
    7. Song, Changhyeon & Park, Kyung Min & Kim, Yeonbae, 2020. "Socio-cultural factors explaining technology-based entrepreneurial activity: Direct and indirect role of social security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Inès Gabarret & Benjamin Vedel, 2015. "Pour une nouvelle approche de la motivation entrepreneuriale," Post-Print hal-01891934, HAL.
    9. Ohlert, Simon & Laibach, Natalie & Harms, Rainer & Bröring, Stefanie, 2025. "Opportunity recognition in the tension field of knowledge and learning: The case of converging industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Nathaly Pinzón & Javier Montero & José L. González-Pernía, 2022. "The influence of individual characteristics on getting involved in an entrepreneurial team: The contingent role of individualism," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1103-1140, September.
    11. Oleksiuk Adam & Pleśniak Agnieszka, 2022. "Environment Characteristics and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights from a Polish and Finnish Sample," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(3), pages 175-194, September.
    12. Niclas Lavesson, 2018. "How does distance to urban centres influence necessity and opportunity‐based firm start‐ups?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(4), pages 1279-1303, November.
    13. Samuel Godadaw Ayinaddis, 2023. "Socio-economic factors affecting women’s entrepreneurial performance in MSEs in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Rui Baptista & Murat Karaöz & João Correia Leitão, 2020. "Diversification by young, small firms: the role of pre-entry resources and entry mistakes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-122, June.
    15. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2018. "Opportunity versus Necessity Entrepreneurship: Two Components of Business Creation," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 959, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Maria Bastida & Ana Olveira & Miguel Ángel Vázquez Taín, 2023. "Are cooperatives gender sensitive? A confirmatory and predictive analysis of women's collective entrepreneurship," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1035-1059, December.
    17. Monika Mühlböck & Julia-Rita Warmuth & Marian Holienka & Bernhard Kittel, 2018. "Desperate entrepreneurs: no opportunities, no skills," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 975-997, December.
    18. Nkosinathi Henry Mothibi & Mmakgabo Justice Malebana & Edward Malatse Rankhumise, 2025. "Determinants of Entrepreneurial Behaviour Among Vocational College and University Students in Gauteng, South Africa: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Robert W. Fairlie & Frank M. Fossen, 2020. "Defining Opportunity versus Necessity Entrepreneurship: Two Components of Business Creation," Research in Labor Economics, in: Change at Home, in the Labor Market, and On the Job, volume 48, pages 253-289, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    20. Frank M. Fossen & Trevor McLemore & Alina Sorgner, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 20(8), pages 781-904, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:5896-5905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.