IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i11p2245-2258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Clustering Water Utilities on Water Service Delivery Case Study in Iringa Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (IRUWASA)

Author

Listed:
  • Baraka Mwago

    (University of Iringa, Iringa, Tanzania)

  • Agness Nzali

    (University of Iringa, Iringa, Tanzania)

  • Sosthenes Ruheza

    (University of Iringa, Iringa, Tanzania)

Abstract

Reliable and high-quality water service provision is essential for public health, economic growth, and environmental sustainability. However, urban and peri-urban water utilities face significant challenges, including inefficiencies, fragmented service delivery, and limited capacity. This study explores the effectiveness of clustering water utilities in enhancing service delivery, focusing on the Iringa Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (IRUWASA) in Tanzania. Although clustering has been proposed as a solution, empirical evidence on its impact, particularly on institutional capacity, water quality, and customer satisfaction, remains limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate how clustering can improve water service delivery by analyzing operational data, governance structures, and customer feedback within IRUWASA’s expanded service areas. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from IRUWASA staff, community leaders, and service users to measure performance metrics such as operational efficiency, cost recovery, and customer satisfaction. Findings indicate that clustering has contributed to operational improvements, expanded service coverage, and better water quality. However, financial sustainability remains a concern, as revenues from the newly clustered zones do not fully meet the operation and maintenance costs. The study recommends additional strategies, including targeted subsidies and capacity-building initiatives, to support the long-term success of clustering. The research provides practical insights for policymakers and water utility managers, suggesting that while clustering can enhance service delivery, complementary measures are necessary to sustain its benefits. These findings contribute to the broader field of urban water management and provide a basis for further exploration of clustering as a model for water utility reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Baraka Mwago & Agness Nzali & Sosthenes Ruheza, 2024. "Effectiveness of Clustering Water Utilities on Water Service Delivery Case Study in Iringa Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (IRUWASA)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 2245-2258, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:2245-2258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-11/2245-2258.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/effectiveness-of-clustering-water-utilities-on-water-service-delivery-case-study-in-iringa-water-supply-and-sanitation-authority-iruwasa/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penrose, Edith T., 1960. "The Growth of the Firm—A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Belenzon & Victor Manuel Bennett & Andrea Patacconi, 2019. "Flexible Production and Entry: Institutional, Technological, and Organizational Determinants," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 193-216, September.
    2. Per L. Bylund, 2015. "Signifying Williamson's Contribution to the Transaction Cost Approach: An Agent-Based Simulation of Coasean Transaction Costs and Specialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 148-174, January.
    3. Elżbieta Jędrych & Dariusz Klimek & Agnieszka Rzepka, 2021. "Principles of Sustainable Management of Energy Companies: The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Stewart Johnston & Angela Paladino, 2007. "Knowledge management and involvement in innovations in MNC subsidiaries," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 281-302, March.
    5. ., 2013. "Reasons for business diversity and their economic importance," Chapters, in: Competition, Diversity and Economic Performance, chapter 5, pages 83-108, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Viktor Fredrich & Siegfried Gudergan & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2022. "Dynamic Capabilities, Internationalization and Growth of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Roles of Research and Development Intensity and Collaborative Intensity," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 611-642, August.
    7. Mariotto, Fábio Luiz & Zanni, Pedro Pinto & Moraes, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de, 2014. "Para que serve um estudo de caso único na pesquisa de gestão?," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(4), July.
    8. Dariusz Klimek & Elżbieta Jędrych, 2020. "A Model for the Sustainable Management of Enterprise Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Dariusz Klimek, 2020. "Sustainable Enterprise Capital Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Christos Pitelis, 2007. "Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspective on the MNE and OLI," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 207-219, March.
    11. De Massis, Alfredo & Kotlar, Josip, 2014. "The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 15-29.
    12. ., 2013. "Diversity of consumers, product innovation and economic performance," Chapters, in: Competition, Diversity and Economic Performance, chapter 3, pages 48-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Brown, Richard S., 2017. "Scanning and updating failure: How AT&T turned its political capability into a core rigidity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 71-89.
    14. Neema Robert Jonathan, 2024. "Assessing the Influence of Training Practices on Employee Performance in Tanzania: A Case of Tanesco Iringa Regional Office," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 76-87, November.
    15. Stefan Hirsch & Jan Schiefer, 2016. "What Causes Firm Profitability Variation in the EU Food Industry? A Redux of Classical Approaches of Variance Decomposition," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 79-92, January.
    16. Garnsey, Elizabeth & Lorenzoni, Gianni & Ferriani, Simone, 2008. "Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: The Acorn-ARM story," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 210-224, March.
    17. Sporleder Thomas L. & Boland Michael A., 2013. "Seven fundamental economic characteristics exclusivity of agrifood supply chains (part 2)," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4 (36), pages 174-180.
    18. Sharon Belenzon & Victor Manuel Bennett & Andrea Patacconi, 2019. "Flexible Production and Entry: Institutional, Technological, and Organizational Determinants," NBER Working Papers 25659, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Mie Augier & David J. Teece, 2007. "Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 175-192, March.
    20. Andy Lockett & Johan Wiklund & Per Davidsson & Sourafel Girma, 2011. "Organic and Acquisitive Growth: Re‐examining, Testing and Extending Penrose's Growth Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 48-74, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:2245-2258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.