IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbn/journl/2007_2_3_essien.html

Technical Efficiency Of Small And Medium Scale Industries (Smi) In Nigeria: Evidence From Nation-Wide Sample Survey

Author

Listed:
  • ESSIEN ABEL ESSIEN

    (West African Monetary Institute (WAMI), Accra, Ghana)

  • YAKUB AMINU BELLO

    (Special Assistant to the Deputy Governor, Central Bank of Nigeria)

Abstract

Development economists over the years have solicited the use of small and medium industries (SMI) to accelerate the pace of industrialization and economic growth, particularly in developing economies. In recognition of this, entrepreneurship education and the promotion of entrepreneur spirit have received significant attention in Nigeria. This is evident through the deep involvement of government and Non-Governmental Organizations in recent times in the promotion and financing of SMI. In spite of all these efforts, the contribution of the SMI sector to economic growth has been miniscule, while the productivity of the sector has also not been commensurate with the incentives packages. This is essentially because the sector lacks knowledge of modern management techniques and technological capabilities. As postulated in the endogenous growth theory, factor accumulation is not enough to engender growth. Efficiency is a key driver of growth as it enables entrepreneurs to derive more output from a given input. This study lays emphasizes on the role of technological capabilities as an important catalyst for the development of SMI and technical efficiency as a major driver of capabilities. An assessment of technical efficiency in this way is necessary because, how technical efficiency contributes to enterprise productivity is a prerequisite to assessing the need for any kind of support for its development. The study utilizes quantitative information gathered from field survey to compute productivity and efficiency indicators. The study also identifies lingering constraints to SMI development. Overall, the findings from this research draw attention to the need for the development of local technology to support and stimulate indigenous entrepreneurship of SMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Essien Abel Essien & Yakub Aminu Bello, 2007. "Technical Efficiency Of Small And Medium Scale Industries (Smi) In Nigeria: Evidence From Nation-Wide Sample Survey," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2007_2_3_essien
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tbs.ubbcluj.ro/RePEc/bbn/journl/2007_2_3_Essien.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Stokey, Nancy L, 1988. "Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(4), pages 701-717, August.
    3. Rangan, Nanda & Grabowski, Richard & Aly, Hassan Y. & Pasurka, Carl, 1988. "The technical efficiency of US banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 169-175.
    4. Pissarides, Francesca & Singer, Miroslav & Svejnar, Jan, 2003. "Objectives and constraints of entrepreneurs: evidence from small and medium size enterprises in Russia and Bulgaria," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 503-531, September.
    5. Bagachwa, M. S. D., 1992. "Choice of technology in small and large firms: Grain milling in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 97-107, January.
    6. Mercedes Gumbau-Albert & Joaquin Maudos, 2002. "The determinants of efficiency: the case of the Spanish industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(15), pages 1941-1948.
    7. André Croppenstedt, 2005. "Measuring Technical Efficiency of Wheat Farmers in Egypt," Working Papers 05-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    8. Croppenstedt, André, "undated". "Measuring technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Egypt," ESA Working Papers 289072, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    9. Sonali Deraniyagala, 2001. "The Impact of Technology Accumulation on Technical Efficiency: An Analysis of the Sri Lankan Clothing and Agricultural Machinery Industries," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 101-114.
    10. Adei, Stephen, 1990. "Technological capacity and aborted industrialization in Ghana: The case of Bonsa Tyre Company," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(11), pages 1501-1511, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haile Girma & Gadisa Abera Dinka & Mohammedsani Ali Gelan, 2019. "Estimation of Technical Efficiency of Micro and Small-Scale Manufacturing Enterprises in Selected Towns of Jimma Zone, Oromia National Regional State," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(4), pages 88-101.
    2. Lu Lin Zhou & James Onuche Ayegba & Emmanuel Onu Ayegba & Peace Maina Ayegba & Zhang Xin Jie, 2021. "Impact of dynamic capacities on the performance of food and beverage enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. V. Chari & Patrick J. Kehoe & Ellen R. McGrattan, 1996. "The Poverty of Nations: A Quantitative Exploration," NBER Working Papers 5414, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Yi-Ling Cheng & Juin-Jen Chang, 2017. "The Quality of Intermediate Goods: Growth and Welfare Implications," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(302), pages 434-447, September.
    3. Jun, Bogang & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2015. "A neo-Schumpeterian perspective on the analytical macroeconomic framework: The expanded reproduction system," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 11-2015, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    4. Adom, Philip Kofi & Adams, Samuel, 2020. "Decomposition of technical efficiency in agricultural production in Africa into transient and persistent technical efficiency under heterogeneous technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Iryna Kalenyuk & Liudmyla Tsymbal, 2021. "Assessment of the intellectual component in economic development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4793-4816, June.
    6. Mehraj Ahmad Sheikh & Mushtaq Ahmad Malik, 2021. "The Nexus of Trade Openness, Institutions and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation of BRICS Countries," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(2), pages 206-215, May.
    7. Marcel Fafchamps & Agnes R. Quisumbing, 1999. "Human Capital, Productivity, and Labor Allocation in Rural Pakistan," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 34(2), pages 369-406.
    8. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:1-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Nancy L Stokey, 2017. "Technology, Skill and Long Run Growth," 2017 Meeting Papers 199, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    10. Arifovic, Jasmina & Karaivanov, Alexander, 2010. "Learning by doing vs. learning from others in a principal-agent model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1967-1992, October.
    11. Koji Kotani & Makoto Kakinaka, 2017. "Some implications of environmental regulation on social welfare under learning-by-doing of eco-products," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(1), pages 121-149, January.
    12. Meyer, Dietmar, 1995. "Az új növekedéselmélet [The new theory of growth]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 387-398.
    13. Jérôme Creel & Maurizio Iacopetta, 2015. "Macroeconomic policy and potential growth," Working Papers hal-03459896, HAL.
    14. Klenow, Peter J. & Rodriguez-Clare, Andres, 2005. "Externalities and Growth," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 817-861, Elsevier.
    15. Rasmus Thönnessen & Erich Gundlach, 2013. "The size of human capital externalities: cross-country evidence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 671-689, December.
    16. Han, Junhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Heterogeneous technology and specialization for economic growth beyond the middle-income stage," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Dosi, Giovanni & Grazzi, Marco & Mathew, Nanditha, 2017. "The cost-quantity relations and the diverse patterns of “learning by doing”: Evidence from India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1873-1886.
    18. MARTINS, Ana Paula, 2015. "Increasing Returns And Endogenous Growth: Market Size And Taste For Variety," Academica Science Journal, Economica Series, Dimitrie Cantemir University, Faculty of Economical Science, vol. 1(5), pages 3-33, June.
    19. Bai Yang, 2021. "Human Capital, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Economic Growth in China: A Literature Review," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(8), pages 1-59, July.
    20. Hiroshi Osano, 1989. "Coordination Failure and Long Run Growth," Discussion Papers 831, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    21. Elizabeth M. Caucutt & Selahattin Imrohoroglu & Krishna B. Kumar, 2003. "Growth and Welfare Analysis of Tax Progressivity in a Heterogeneous-Agent Model," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 6(3), pages 546-577, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q19 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2007_2_3_essien. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cornelia Pop (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fbubbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.