IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2026i1p94-125.html

Architectural Capital: A Modern Framework for Addressing Consumer Dissatisfaction and Utility Stagnation

Author

Listed:
  • Momchil R. Rusev

Abstract

This paper investigates a paradox of the early twenty-first century: despite rapid technological acceleration, consumer utility, satisfaction, and long-term sustainability have not increased proportionally. Building on Romer’s theory of endogenous growth, the study introduces the concept of Architectural Capital (ArchCap) – a systemic property that captures the degree to which technological knowledge (ATech) is organised into a coherent, predictable, sustainable, and maintainable product architecture. ArchCap is operationalized through four analytical components: cognitive load, repairability and maintainability, total cost of ownership, and architectural coherence. Empirical evidence shows that products with moderate technological density but high architectural capital – such as the Ford Model T, Volkswagen Beetle, FIAT 124/Lada 2101–2107, and early-generation iPhones – achieve higher real utility, lower ownership costs, and greater long-term sustainability than many contemporary devices with far higher ATech. These findings reveal a phenomenon of architectural entropy, in which escalating complexity nullifies a significant share of the value generated by technological knowledge. The paper argues that architectural capital is the missing structural parameter in contemporary growth models and should be integrated into regulatory frameworks as a criterion for systemic sustainability, maintainability, and consumer safety. ArchCap is proposed as an analytical filter for evaluating innovations, public policies, and R&D strategies, ensuring that technological progress is translated into genuine economic and societal benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Momchil R. Rusev, 2026. "Architectural Capital: A Modern Framework for Addressing Consumer Dissatisfaction and Utility Stagnation," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 94-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2026:i:1:p:94-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://etj.iki.bas.bg/storage/app/uploads/public/69c/eb9/a08/69ceb9a08c247070468252.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rossitsa Chobanova, 2012. "Knowledge and Innovative Development of the Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 5-22.
    2. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, December.
    3. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    4. Ulrich, Karl, 1995. "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 419-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Heong Chan & Shi-Ying Lim, 2023. "The Emergence of Novel Product Uses: An Investigation of Exaptations in IKEA Hacks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2870-2892, May.
    2. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    3. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    4. Glenn Hoetker & Anand Swaminathan & Will Mitchell, 2007. "Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 178-191, February.
    5. Prabal Das & Nabendu Sen & Nilanjana Chakrabarty & Amit Kumar Das, 2026. "A 6R-Based Inventory Optimization Framework for Modular Electronics: Benchmarking Remanufacturing and Recovery Strategies in a Circular Economy Context," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Vincent FRIGANT & Stéphanie PERES & Stéphane VIROL, 2012. "How do SMEs to rise at the top of the supply chain? An econometric exploration of the French auto industry (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-16, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    7. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    8. Fixson, Sebastian K. & Park, Jin-Kyu, 2008. "The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1296-1316, September.
    9. Willy C. Shih, 2021. "Increasing the Level of Abstraction as a Strategy for Accelerating the Adoption of Complex Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 54-61, March.
    10. Rainer Schmidt & Rainer Alt & Alfred Zimmermann, 2026. "Value co-creation on networked platforms — A service-dominant logic analysis of the Alexa Assistant ecosystem," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. MacCormack, Alan & Baldwin, Carliss & Rusnak, John, 2012. "Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1309-1324.
    12. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Jannis Kallinikos & Robert Gregory & Gordon Burtch & Sutirtha Chatterjee & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1507-1523, December.
    13. Moonwon Chung & Luv Sharma & Manoj K. Malhotra, 2023. "Impact of Modularity Design on Mobile App Launch Success," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 756-774, March.
    14. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Vincent Frigant & Damien Talbot, 2007. "Proximites Et Logique Modulaire Dans L'Automobile Et L'Aeronautique : Vers Une Dualisation Des Espaces D'Approvisionnement," Post-Print hal-02376436, HAL.
    16. Florent Catel & Jean-Charles Monateri, 2007. "Modularité et dynamique des relations durables entre entreprises : le cas des produits et systèmes complexes," Post-Print halshs-00217607, HAL.
    17. Simge Tuna & Stefano Brusoni & Anja Schulze, 2019. "Architectural knowledge generation: evidence from a field study," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(5), pages 977-1009.
    18. Damien Talbot, 2018. "L’industrie aéronautique civile européenne : vers une banalisation ?," Post-Print halshs-02007393, HAL.
    19. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.
    20. James Feigenbaum & Daniel P. Gross, 2024. "Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8520-8540, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • L62 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment; Related Parts and Equipment
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2026:i:1:p:94-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.