IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/jetart/v2y2024i13p91-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining directions for transforming the organization's competence structure depending on its life cycle stage in the context of enabling effective operation in the market

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Gruzina

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

  • Tetyana Lepeyko

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

  • Kateryna Lohinova

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

  • Ivanna Pererva

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

  • Olga Myronova

    (Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics)

Abstract

The object of research is the process of functioning of organizations at different stages of the life cycle (LC). Papers addressing the management of organizations ignore the need for them to acquire competence to successfully solve the tasks of each stage. This directed the research to the definition of priority management tasks, determined by the nature of activity at different stages of LC, and the competencies necessary for their solution. The directions of the transformation of the structure of organizational competence due to the change in the frequency of reference by heads of organizations to its members in the process of solving tasks have been determined. The importance of functional and basic component competencies at the birth stage was noted (36.7 and 38.7 % of reference in the total number). The increase in the frequency of reference to the competencies of synergistic, key, and strategic components (3.4; 2.2; 1.66 times) at the stage of intensive growth is explained by the organization gaining authority in business circles, the possibility of its use for lobbying organizational interests. Among the competences at the stage of maturity, representatives of the synergistic and functional components prevail – the increase in the frequency of reference by 1.44 and 1.1 times, respectively. The share of reference to the competences of the basic component is also high (40 %). At the stage of decline, functional and basic competencies remained important (36.9 and 39.5 %), in particular, the competencies of managers in ensuring the most painless liquidation of the organization. A distinctive feature of the study is the addition of the procedure for determining the stage of LC with a list of priority tasks and the competencies necessary for their solution. This made it possible to understand the directions of the transformation of competence, to identify the need for the development of competences due to the organization's position on the life cycle curve or its change

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Gruzina & Tetyana Lepeyko & Kateryna Lohinova & Ivanna Pererva & Olga Myronova, 2024. "Determining directions for transforming the organization's competence structure depending on its life cycle stage in the context of enabling effective operation in the market," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(13 (128)), pages 91-102, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2024:i:13:p:91-102
    DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/download/300910/295015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Correction to: Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(3), pages 139-139, December.
    2. Kristina Henzler & Stephanie D. Maier & Michael Jäger & Rafael Horn, 2020. "SDG-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Innovations in the Field of Urban Surfaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Rizal Taufiq Fauzi & Patrick Lavoie & Luca Sorelli & Mohammad Davoud Heidari & Ben Amor, 2019. "Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Gray, 2024. "The life cycle of international cooperation: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 641-664, October.
    2. Uz Zaman, Qamar & Zhao, Yuhuan & Zaman, Shah & Batool, Kiran & Nasir, Rabiya, 2024. "Reviewing energy efficiency and environmental consciousness in the minerals industry Amidst digital transition: A comprehensive review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Muel Kaptein, 2023. "A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 297-316, April.
    4. Diego Campagnolo & Martina Gianecchini & Luigi Mosca, 2024. "Configurations of business model themes and strategies in small firms: a qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Hossein Basereh Taramsari & Steven Hoffenson & Roshanak Nilchiani, 2025. "Holistic Sustainable Design: Incorporating Change Propagation and Triple Bottom Line Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Roope Husgafvel, 2021. "Exploring Social Sustainability Handprint—Part 1: Handprint and Life Cycle Thinking and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    7. Cleovir José Milani & Víctor Yepes & Moacir Kripka, 2020. "Proposal of Sustainability Indicators for the Design of Small-Span Bridges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Sebastian Fredershausen & Henrik Lechte & Mathias Willnat & Tobias Witt & Christine Harnischmacher & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Matthias Klumpp & Lutz Kolbe, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Hydrogen Supply Chains: A Structured Literature Review Regarding Sustainability Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Isabel García Gutiérrez & Daniel Elduque & Carmelo Pina & Rafael Tobajas & Carlos Javierre, 2020. "Influence of the Composition on the Environmental Impact of a Casting Magnesium Alloy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Ester Foppa Pedretti & Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom & Elena Valentini & Alessio Ilari & Daniele Duca, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Spinach Produced in Central and Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Abdulfattah Omar & Waheed Altohami & Muhammad Afzaal, 2022. "Assessment of the Governance Quality of the Departments of English in Saudi Universities: Implications for Sustainable Development," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(8), pages 443-443, December.
    12. Natalia Muñoz López & Jose Luis Santolaya Sáenz & Anna Biedermann & Ana Serrano Tierz, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Product–Service Systems Using Flows between Systems Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Gabriela Kania & Klaudia Kwiecień & Mateusz Malinowski & Maciej Gliniak, 2021. "Analyses of the Life Cycles and Social Costs of CO 2 Emissions of Single-Family Residential Buildings: A Case Study in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    14. David Teh & Tehmina Khan & Brian Corbitt & Chin Eang Ong, 2020. "Sustainability strategy and blockchain-enabled life cycle assessment: a focus on materials industry," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 605-622, December.
    15. Kamilė Petrauskienė & Arvydas Galinis & Daina Kliaugaitė & Jolanta Dvarionienė, 2021. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle and Cost Assessment of Electric, Hybrid, and Conventional Vehicles in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    17. Malaquias Zildo António Tsambe & Cássio Florisbal de Almeida & Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya & Luiz Fernando de Abreu Cybis, 2021. "Application of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment to Used Lubricant Oil Management in South Brazilian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Jana Gerta Backes & Leonie Sophie Steinberg & Alexandra Weniger & Marzia Traverso, 2023. "Visualization and Interpretation of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment—Existing Tools and Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Elagouz, Noura & Onat, Nuri C. & Kucukvar, Murat & Kharbeche, Mohamed & Kutty, Adeeb A., 2025. "Sustainable technology transition in bus fleet management: Integrating life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-objective optimization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    20. Francisco J. Tapiador & Andrés Navarro & Josu Mezo & Sergio de la Llave & Jesús Muñoz, 2021. "Urban Vegetation Leveraging Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:jetart:v:2:y:2024:i:13:p:91-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.