IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220195317.html

The Conceptual Orientation Of The System Of Regulation Of Industrial Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yuriy Melnyk

    (Odesa National Academy of Food Technologies, Ukraine)

  • Vyacheslav Truba

    (Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The industrial sector is the most important segment of the macroeconomic environment of the country, the performance of which depends on its functioning and development in the global economic environment. The development of industry in the national macroeconomic environment is possible at the expense of an effective regulatory system, which should have modern instrumental support that corresponds to modern trends in the development of global economic systems. The article is based on the theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of a system for regulating the development of industry and defining its conceptual benchmarks in the conditions of transformation changes in the economy. Methodology. Legislative and normative documents, materials of periodicals, statistical data, and Internet resources were the information base of the study. The paper uses general scientific and special methods: monographic examination, generalization, systematization, economicstatistical analysis, and modelling. This allowed investigating the current state and possibilities of regulating the development of industry in different models of the regulatory system and the forms of its implementation, substantiating the conceptual foundations and directions of the transformation of the system of regulation of the development of the domestic industrial sector and criteria for evaluating its effectiveness. Results. It is proved that the process of regulating the development of industry in the national economy should be considered from the point of view of a systemic approach in the macroeconomic environment, where the basic elements of a defined system are the purpose, strategic guidelines and objectives, principles and limitations, regulatory functions, institutional actors that influence on industry and its structural units with the help of well-grounded tools. The expediency of assessing the system of regulation of industrial development based on the criteria of rationality, regulation, management, and efficiency is proved, and models of the corresponding analytical indicators are proposed. It is proved that the formation of the most perspective and effective mechanism of regulating the development of the industry is to find the optimal combination of vectors of rationality and efficiency in the implementation of all large-scale transformations in the system of regulation in the national macroeconomic environment. The alternative development options in the domestic industrial sector and the relevant conceptual guidelines for the regulation of the development of industry in the national macroeconomic environment are determined. Practical meaning. The introduction of these results in order to change the system of regulation of industrial development will contribute to ensuring the role of the industrial sector as the main driver of innovation and investment development of the country's economy. Value/оriginality. The author's definition of the process of regulating the development of industry from the standpoint of the system approach, proposed methodological approaches to the assessment of the effectiveness of the development regulation system according to criteria and indicators of rationality and manageability, is aimed at the further formation of system measures to create favourable conditions for the development of industry in the national macroeconomic environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuriy Melnyk & Vyacheslav Truba, 2019. "The Conceptual Orientation Of The System Of Regulation Of Industrial Development," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2019:5:3:17
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-125-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-125-134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    2. Harry M. Trebing, 1987. "Regulation of Industry: An Institutionalist Approach," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 1707-1737, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dassler, Thoralf, 2006. "Combining theories of regulation - Proposing a framework for analysing regulatory systems worldwide," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 31-43, March.
    2. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    3. Rodrigo M. S. Moita & Claudio Paiva, 2013. "Political Price Cycles in Regulated Industries: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 94-121, February.
    4. Jochen Diekmann & Hans-Joachim Ziesing & Uwe Leprich, 2006. "Anreizregulierung für Beschäftigung und Netzinvestitionen: Endbericht ; Forschungsvorhaben gefördert durch die Hans-Böckler-Stiftung," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 23, number pbk23.
    5. Francesco Trebbi & Miao Ben Zhang, 2022. "The Cost of Regulatory Compliance in the United States," NBER Working Papers 30691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Scott Gehlbach & Konstantin Sonin & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2010. "Businessman Candidates," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 718-736, July.
    7. Francesco Caselli & Nicola Gennaioli, 2008. "Economics and Politics of Alternative Institutional Reforms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(3), pages 1197-1250.
    8. Carlo Cambini & Yossi Spiegel, 2016. "Investment and Capital Structure of Partially Private Regulated Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 487-515, April.
    9. Bailey, James, 2016. "Can Health Spending Be Reined In through Supply Constraints? An Evaluation of Certificate-of-Need Laws," Working Papers 05192, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    10. Paula López-Villalba & Christian Ruzzier, 2026. "Ideology and Corruption," Working Papers 178, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Mar 2026.
    11. H. Frech, 1973. "The public choice theory of murray N. Rothbard, a modern anarchist," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 143-154, March.
    12. Michiel Bijlsma & Wouter Elsenburg & Michiel van Leuvensteijn, 2010. "Four Futures for Finance; A scenario study," CPB Document 211.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Ernesto Dal Bó & Pedro Dal Bó & Rafael Di Tella, 2007. "Reputation When Threats and Transfers Are Available," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 577-598, September.
    14. Kari Irwin Otteburn, 2023. "All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 311-329, September.
    15. McShane, Michael K. & Cox, Larry A. & Butler, Richard J., 2010. "Regulatory competition and forbearance: Evidence from the life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 522-532, March.
    16. Bommer, Rolf, 1995. "Environmental policy and industrial competitiveness: The pollution haven hypothesis reconsidered," Discussion Papers, Series II 262, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    17. Samuel K. Allen & Price V. Fishback & Rebecca Holmes, 2025. "The impact of progressive era labor regulations on annual earnings and employment in manufacturing in the USA, 1904–1919," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 19(1), pages 249-278, January.
    18. McLaughlin, Patrick & Potts, Jason, 2019. "RegData: Australia," Working Papers 10062, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    19. Hinh Khieu & Nam H. Nguyen & Hieu V. Phan & Jon A. Fulkerson, 2023. "Political Corruption and Corporate Risk-Taking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 93-113, April.
    20. Thomas Wyrick & Roger Arnold, 1989. "Earmarking as a deterrent to rent-seeking," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 283-291, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
    • L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2019:5:3:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.