IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v34y2025i2p543-559.html

The Impact Of Seaport Cargo On Economic Development: Panel Data Evidence From Turkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Tehci

    (Ordu University, Fatsa Faculty of Marine Sciences, Department of Maritime Business Administration, Ordu, Turkiye)

  • Fuad Selamzade

    (Muş Alparslan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Muş, Turkiye)

  • Sam Demirkol

    (University of Sussex, Strategy & Marketing Department, Sussex Business School, United Kingdom)

  • Aycan Kama

    (Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Turkiye)

  • Yusuf Ersoy

    (Muş Alparslan University, Malazgirt Vocational School, Muş, Turkiye)

Abstract

The strategic importance of ports increases the share of maritime transport in international trade. Most of the cargo handled in ports is related to foreign trade. The current study focuses on the impact of the outputs of 18 container and cargo ports involved in international trade in Türkiye on macroeconomic indicators. The effects of the cargo outputs of the ports for the years 2004-2022 on GDP were estimated using panel data regression models. The results show that the amount of cargo handled in ports influences the exports and industrial production of the provinces. It was also concluded that the amount of cargo exports has an essential impact on increasing GDP. It is imperative to enhance ports and fully utilize their potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Tehci & Fuad Selamzade & Sam Demirkol & Aycan Kama & Yusuf Ersoy, 2025. "The Impact Of Seaport Cargo On Economic Development: Panel Data Evidence From Turkiye," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 34(2), pages 543-559, november.
  • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:543-559
    DOI: 10.17818/EMIP/2025/18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php/clanak/490890
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17818/EMIP/2025/18?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Coto-Millan & Jose Banos-Pino & Ana Rodriguez-Alvarez, 2000. "Economic efficiency in Spanish ports: some empirical evidence," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 169-174, April.
    2. Deng, Ping & Lu, Shiqing & Xiao, Hanbin, 2013. "Evaluation of the relevance measure between ports and regional economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-133.
    3. Mohan, Ramesh & Mirmirani, Sam, 2007. "An Assessment of OECD Health Care System Using Panel Data Analysis," MPRA Paper 6122, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Ducruet, César & Juhász, Réka & Nagy, Dávid Krisztián & Steinwender, Claudia, 2024. "All aboard: The effects of port development," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Quintano & Paolo Mazzocchi & Antonella Rocca, 2020. "A competitive analysis of EU ports by fixing spatial and economic dimensions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    3. Ziyan Zheng & Fangdao Qiu & Xinlin Zhang, 2020. "Heterogeneity of correlation between the locational condition and industrial transformation of regenerative resource‐based cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 771-791, June.
    4. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Chapter 22 Port Performance: An Economics Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 499-516, January.
    5. Kammoun Rabeb, 2018. "The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 73-84, October.
    6. Sheykhfard, Abbas & Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Das, Subasish & Kutela, Boniphace, 2025. "Analyzing purchase intentions of used electric vehicles through consumer experiences: A structural equation modeling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 125-137.
    7. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Matheus Koengkan & José Alberto Fuinhas & Emad Kazemzadeh & Fariba Osmani & Nooshin Karimi Alavijeh, 2022. "Measuring the economic efficiency performance in Latin American and Caribbean countries: An empirical evidence from stochastic production frontier and data envelopment analysis," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 169, pages 43-54.
    9. Mounir Amdaoud & César Ducruet & Marc‐Antoine Faure, 2022. "The mutual specialization of port and urban functions: The case of France," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 439-460, April.
    10. Sergi Saurí & Francesc Robusté, 2012. "Promoting Incentives: Performance Improvement in Container Port Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 233-246, May.
    11. Deda Đelović, 2024. "Considerations on Prevention of Pollution from Ships in a Seaport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Optimum Port Throughput," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208010, Transportation Research Forum.
    13. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    14. Redding, Stephen, 2020. "Trade and Geography," CEPR Discussion Papers 15268, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Hidalgo, Soraya & Núñez-Sánchez, Ramón, 2012. "Estimating allocative efficiency in port authorities with demand uncertainty," MPRA Paper 38136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Yuen, Andrew Chi-lok & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2013. "Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 220-231.
    18. Do, Anh & Ganapati, Sharat & Wong, Woan Foong & Ziv, Oren, 2025. "Transshipment Hubs, Trade, and Supply Chains," CEPR Discussion Papers 20731, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Coto-Millán, Pablo & Fernández, Xose Luis & Hidalgo, Soraya & Pesquera, Miguel Ángel, 2016. "Public regulation and technical efficiency in the Spanish Port Authorities: 1986–2012," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 139-148.
    20. Morales Sarriera, Javier & Serebrisky, Tomás & Araya, Gonzalo & Briceño-Garmendia, Cecilia & Schwartz, Jordan, 2013. "Benchmarking Container Port Technical Efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4702, Inter-American Development Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:543-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.