IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v31y2022i2p603-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Veblen: Pioneer Of Open Economic Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma Esra Soylu

    (Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University,Department of Economics, Alanya, Turkey)

Abstract

In this study, it is argued that the main failure of mainstream economics is its inability to establish a social ontology and Thorstein Veblen, the founder of the Institutional Economics school, has an important role in establishing this social ontology. Considering the social and economic reality as a closed system, which mainstream economics presupposes in the analysis, is the main reason behind its failure to produce solutions to real world problems. The necessity of an open system ontology is a common issue for heterodox schools of economics that opposes the mainstream. It will be argued that Veblen’s analysis has the ideas that form the basis of this concept. First, the basic elements of the open system approach will be discussed. Then, it will be argued that the elements of the evolutionist approach, the relationship between structure-agent, the rejection of positivism and the cumulative causality in Veblen’s analysis are consistent with the open system approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma Esra Soylu, 2022. "Veblen: Pioneer Of Open Economic Reality," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 31(2), pages 603-621, december.
    • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:603-621
    DOI: 10.17818/EMIP/2022/2.12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php/clanak/416005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17818/EMIP/2022/2.12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheila C. Dow & Victoria Chick, 2012. "The Meaning of Open Systems," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foundations for New Economic Thinking, chapter 11, pages 178-196, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Victoria Chick, 2004. "On open systems," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 24(1), pages 3-17.
    3. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2000. "What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 317-329, June.
    4. Tony Lawson, 2004. "Reorienting Economics: On heterodox economics, themata and the use of mathematics in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 329-340.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2025. "Tony Lawson’s Critique of Modern Economics and his Contribution to Heterodox Economics," MPRA Paper 123406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Sheila C. Dow & Victoria Chick, 2012. "The Meaning of Open Systems," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foundations for New Economic Thinking, chapter 11, pages 178-196, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Lynne Chester, 2019. "Judging Heterodox Economics: A Response to Hodgson's Criticisms," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Damien Talbot, 2005. "Les proximités, entre contrainte et libération de l’action : le cas d’EADS," Post-Print hal-02375016, HAL.
    5. Nastasi, Federico & Spagano, Salvatore, 2023. "Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 120242, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "Will the institution of coexistence be re-defined by TTIP?," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211478, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
    7. Bruno Jossa, 2018. "Is Historical Materialism a Deterministic Approach? The Democratic Firm and the Transition to Socialism," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 82-98, March.
    8. Strunz, Sebastian & Klauer, Bernd & Ring, Irene & Schiller, Johannes, 2014. "Between Scylla and Charybdis: On the place of economic methods and concepts within ecological economics," UFZ Discussion Papers 26/2014, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    9. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    10. Sheila Dow, 2012. "Uncertainty-Denial," Department Discussion Papers 1204, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    11. Marcello Signorelli & Enrico Marelli, 2007. "Institutional change, regional features and aggregate performance in eight EU’s transition countries," Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica 37/2007, Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.
    12. Phil Faulkner & Stephen Pratten & Jochen Runde, 2017. "Cambridge Social Ontology: Clarification, Development and Deployment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(5), pages 1265-1277.
    13. Piero Ferri & Anna Maria Variato, 2007. "Macro Dynamics in a Model with Uncertainty," Working Papers (-2012) 0704, University of Bergamo, Department of Economics.
    14. Ellen J. Klupfel & Wayne C. Pfeiffer & Glen C. Filson, 2003. "Thought for Fuelling Change: A Review of Three Models for Understanding Environmentally Significant Transitions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 29-38, March.
    15. Muhammad Ali Nasir & Jamie Morgan, 2025. "The methodological problem of unit roots: stationarity and its consequences in the context of the Tinbergen debate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(1), pages 113-130, April.
    16. Dow, Sheila, 2016. "Uncertainty: A diagrammatic treatment," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-25.
    17. Tiago Cardão-Pito, 2021. "Academic discipline of economics as hedonist philosophy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 199-207, November.
    18. Pirgmaier, Elke, 2017. "The Neoclassical Trojan Horse of Steady-State Economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 52-61.
    19. Sheila C. Dow, 2013. "Framing finance: A methodological account," Working Papers PKWP1308, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    20. Essiane, Patrick-Nelson Daniel, 2020. "De l'Ancienne Economie Institutionnelle à la Nouvelle Economie Institutionnelle: une introduction à quelques débats [Old Institutional Economics and New Institutional Economics: an Introduction to ," MPRA Paper 102858, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:603-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.