IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/120242.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Nastasi, Federico
  • Spagano, Salvatore

Abstract

The Brazilian economist Celso Furtado escapes from the traditional distinctions among different schools of thought. Indeed, he made large use of tools from various proveniences according to a pragmatic approach. Nonetheless, this paper shows that his work also contains several characteristic elements of the institutionalist tradition. In the early 1960s, Furtado placed institutions at the centre of his analysis of the evolution of the economic history. Moreover, he rejected the kind of determinism that follows a concept of choice entirely dependent on the utility-maximizing rationality. Coherently, he opposed the New Institutional Economics as an example of neoclassical retread of institutional issues. Finally, and especially, even without theorizing it, he adopted the institutionalised individual as an economic agent. This choice, rather than that of the homo oeconomicus, implied assuming an agent able to shape institutions that, in turn, influence human behaviours according to a downward cumulative causation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nastasi, Federico & Spagano, Salvatore, 2023. "Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 120242, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120242/1/MPRA_paper_120242.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dequech, David, 2013. "Economic institutions: explanations for conformity and room for deviation," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 81-108, March.
    2. Emilia Ormaechea, 2020. "Latin American Development: What About the State, Conflict and Power?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 322-328, April.
    3. G. Hodgson, 2007. "What Are Institutions?," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 8.
    4. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    5. James H. Street, 1987. "Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986: An Appreciation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 649-659, June.
    6. Bielschowsky, Ricardo, 2006. "Vigencia de los aportes de Celso Furtado al estructuralismo," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2000. "What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 317-329, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    2. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "Will the institution of coexistence be re-defined by TTIP?," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211478, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
    3. Golovics, József, 2021. "Intézmények, tökéletlen racionalitás és tranzakciós költség. Egységes terminológia az új intézményi Nobel-díjasok körében? [Institutions, imperfect rationality and transaction cost. A unified termi," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 32-46.
    4. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    5. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Zoltán Bartha & Andrea S. Gubik, 2014. "Characteristics Of The Large Corporation-Based, Bureaucratic Model Among Oecd Countries – An Foi Model Analysis," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 1-20, March.
    7. Thierry Baudassé & Rémi Bazillier & Ismaël Issifou, 2018. "Migration And Institutions: Exit And Voice (From Abroad)?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 727-766, July.
    8. Magdalena Owczarczuk, 2020. "Institutional competitiveness of Central and Eastern European countries and the inflow of foreign direct investments," Catallaxy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(2), pages 87-96, December.
    9. Hans-Bernd Schaefer & Rok Spruk, 2024. "Islamic Law, Western European Law and the Roots of Middle East's Long Divergence: a Comparative Empirical Investigation (800-1600)," Papers 2401.14435, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    10. Ashok Chakravarti, 2012. "Institutions, Economic Performance and the Visible Hand," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14751.
    11. Poomjai Nacaskul & Kritchaya Janjaroen & Suparit Suwanik, 2012. "Economic Rationales for Central Banking: Historical Evolution, Policy Space, Institutional Integrity, and Paradigm Challenges," Working Papers 2012-04, Monetary Policy Group, Bank of Thailand.
    12. Shankaran Nambiar, 2013. "Capabilities, conversion factors and institutions," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 13(3), pages 221-230, July.
    13. Eduardo Fernández-Huerga & Ana Pardo & Ana Salvador, 2023. "Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 413-443, July.
    14. John Groenewegen, 2011. "Evolution and Design of Institutions Supporting Liberalization," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Salvatore Rizzello & Margherita Turvani, 2002. "Subjective Diversity and Social Learning: A Cognitive Perspective for Understanding Institutional Behavior," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 197-210, June.
    16. Ajai Gaur & Chinmay Pattnaik & Deeksha Singh & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2022. "Societal trust, formal institutions, and foreign subsidiary staffing," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1045-1061, August.
    17. Jacek Lewkowicz & Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska, 2016. "De jure and de facto institutions – disentangling the interrelationships," Working Papers 2016-29, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    18. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.
    19. Grillitsch, Markus, 2014. "Institutional Change and Economic Evolution in Regions," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Andrieş, Alin Marius & Plopeanu, Aurelian-Petruş & Sprincean, Nicu, 2023. "Institutional determinants of households’ financial investment behaviour across European countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 300-325.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Furtado; Structuralism; Institutionalism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.